MG5150 wrote:Hello Everyone
Victoria has just proposed an immediate ban on lead ammo for game birds and intends to extend this ban to deer by 2028.
I've only recently taken up hunting again after a long absence and wanted to ask some of the more informed people here about alternative ammunition.
My understanding is that alternatives to lead are not readily available in higher calibres. I hunt with a 30-06. What current alternatives do I have to lead ammunition (here in Victoria the minimum calibre is 270 with 130g bullets for Sambar).
Many would speculate that the government is trying to ban the ammo so you can't hunt with higher calibres and then use that precedent to say hunting is no longer a means for valid firearms ownership in Victoria. I'd like to raise awareness of the issue with hunters and gun owners and compel them to fight the ban on lead ammunition but it has to be done with the truth rather than fear-mongering.
Any advice on non-lead ammunition for higher calibre guns is much appreciated.
PS, you can have your say on the issue here:
https://engage.vic.gov.au/proposed-wild ... OaSwZJw2Sg
17Dave wrote:Just about all manufacturers produce a non lead option. In rifles it's typically copper or an alloy of. Are they as effective as lead, I'm not convinced but they are a viable alternative and are listed as non toxic.
If Vic is heading down the path then other states will follow the leader at some point. We should all make a submission on this, although I'm not sure there is a valid argument against the ban.
17Dave wrote:Just about all manufacturers produce a non lead option. In rifles it's typically copper or an alloy of. Are they as effective as lead, I'm not convinced but they are a viable alternative and are listed as non toxic.
If Vic is heading down the path then other states will follow the leader at some point. We should all make a submission on this, although I'm not sure there is a valid argument against the ban.
Oldbloke wrote:There is actually a very sensible alternative.
Require all hunters to dispose of lead contaminated meat responsibility.
e.g bury it or off to the local rubbish tip.
P.S. I wonder much 1080 is contamination our soil?
And killing natives?
Jorlcrin wrote:Oldbloke wrote:There is actually a very sensible alternative.
Require all hunters to dispose of lead contaminated meat responsibility.
e.g bury it or off to the local rubbish tip.
P.S. I wonder much 1080 is contamination our soil?
And killing natives?
You...Do know that 1080 (Sodium Fluroacetate) was first discovered in Australia, in a large number of native plants?
It's a poison that occurs here in the wild, and I suspect you'll find it breaks down just fine.
One reason it's been so heavily used on dogs/cats/pigs etc, is that many of the native animals have a high tolerance to it, so a much lower dose will nobble the introduced animals.
I'm not saying using 1080 doesnt present some problems(quolls penguins), but to suggest it stays in the soil,is a bit over the top.
Jorlcrin wrote:Oldbloke wrote:There is actually a very sensible alternative.
Require all hunters to dispose of lead contaminated meat responsibility.
e.g bury it or off to the local rubbish tip.
P.S. I wonder much 1080 is contamination our soil?
And killing natives?
You...Do know that 1080 (Sodium Fluroacetate) was first discovered in Australia, in a large number of native plants?
It's a poison that occurs here in the wild, and I suspect you'll find it breaks down just fine.
One reason it's been so heavily used on dogs/cats/pigs etc, is that many of the native animals have a high tolerance to it, so a much lower dose will nobble the introduced animals.
I'm not saying using 1080 doesnt present some problems(quolls penguins), but to suggest it stays in the soil,is a bit over the top.
bladeracer wrote:\
That would be ridiculous, if they want to ban hunting it would be far easier to simply ban it, there'd be no point in trying to sneak it through this way.
MG5150 wrote:Thanks for such a detailed response! I am going to check out the ammo now.bladeracer wrote:\
That would be ridiculous, if they want to ban hunting it would be far easier to simply ban it, there'd be no point in trying to sneak it through this way.
They recently tried to ban duck hunting in Vic but faced too much of a pushback from hunters and backed off.
If you look at all the new proposals at the website I linked you'll find one of them is funding to turn more duck hunting habitat into 'shared recreation areas in line with Vic's Great Outdoors plan' by adding campsites which I interpreted as "we can't outright ban duckhunting so we're going to rezone a few areas so you can't hunt there.
Similarly, they are trying to push through the new Great Forest National Park and are going to include a dozen existing state forests where you are free to hunt all year round into the new giant park where there will be no hunting.
Bowhunting has also just been banned in SA and new gun laws have just been passed over in Perth.
call me crazy but hunting and gun ownership appears to be under attack.
bladeracer wrote:
Yes, hunting, in all forms, and firearm ownership particularly, has been under attack for at least forty years I think.
Jorlcrin wrote:Oldbloke wrote:There is actually a very sensible alternative.
Require all hunters to dispose of lead contaminated meat responsibility.
e.g bury it or off to the local rubbish tip.
P.S. I wonder much 1080 is contamination our soil?
And killing natives?
You...Do know that 1080 (Sodium Fluroacetate) was first discovered in Australia, in a large number of native plants?
It's a poison that occurs here in the wild, and I suspect you'll find it breaks down just fine.
One reason it's been so heavily used on dogs/cats/pigs etc, is that many of the native animals have a high tolerance to it, so a much lower dose will nobble the introduced animals.
I'm not saying using 1080 doesnt present some problems(quolls penguins), but to suggest it stays in the soil,is a bit over the top.
bladeracer wrote:Duck hunting is back for now, they'll keep trying and eventually they'll get it through.
I'm hopeful that the message is getting out to the general public that will stop this national park rubbish, but even if we stop it it's only a matter of time until it gets pushed through. They usually change state forests into national parks very quietly, before anybody can put up a protest.
Bowhunting is now technically banned in SA but when I looked at the proposal I couldn't see that it actually stopped about 99% of bowhunters from continuing hunting. I haven't looked at what they finally pushed through though.
Yes, hunting, in all forms, and firearm ownership particularly, has been under attack for at least forty years I think.MG5150 wrote:Thanks for such a detailed response! I am going to check out the ammo now.bladeracer wrote:\
That would be ridiculous, if they want to ban hunting it would be far easier to simply ban it, there'd be no point in trying to sneak it through this way.
They recently tried to ban duck hunting in Vic but faced too much of a pushback from hunters and backed off.
If you look at all the new proposals at the website I linked you'll find one of them is funding to turn more duck hunting habitat into 'shared recreation areas in line with Vic's Great Outdoors plan' by adding campsites which I interpreted as "we can't outright ban duckhunting so we're going to rezone a few areas so you can't hunt there.
Similarly, they are trying to push through the new Great Forest National Park and are going to include a dozen existing state forests where you are free to hunt all year round into the new giant park where there will be no hunting.
Bowhunting has also just been banned in SA and new gun laws have just been passed over in Perth.
call me crazy but hunting and gun ownership appears to be under attack.
bigpete wrote:I for one am going to start shooting depleted uranium projectiles
animalpest wrote:Jorlcrin wrote:Oldbloke wrote:There is actually a very sensible alternative.
Require all hunters to dispose of lead contaminated meat responsibility.
e.g bury it or off to the local rubbish tip.
P.S. I wonder much 1080 is contamination our soil?
And killing natives?
You...Do know that 1080 (Sodium Fluroacetate) was first discovered in Australia, in a large number of native plants?
It's a poison that occurs here in the wild, and I suspect you'll find it breaks down just fine.
One reason it's been so heavily used on dogs/cats/pigs etc, is that many of the native animals have a high tolerance to it, so a much lower dose will nobble the introduced animals.
I'm not saying using 1080 doesnt present some problems(quolls penguins), but to suggest it stays in the soil,is a bit over the top.
1080 was not first discovered in Australia. It was first synthesised in a Belgium laboratory in 1896.
Jorlcrin wrote:animalpest wrote:Jorlcrin wrote:Oldbloke wrote:There is actually a very sensible alternative.
Require all hunters to dispose of lead contaminated meat responsibility.
e.g bury it or off to the local rubbish tip.
P.S. I wonder much 1080 is contamination our soil?
And killing natives?
You...Do know that 1080 (Sodium Fluroacetate) was first discovered in Australia, in a large number of native plants?
It's a poison that occurs here in the wild, and I suspect you'll find it breaks down just fine.
One reason it's been so heavily used on dogs/cats/pigs etc, is that many of the native animals have a high tolerance to it, so a much lower dose will nobble the introduced animals.
I'm not saying using 1080 doesnt present some problems(quolls penguins), but to suggest it stays in the soil,is a bit over the top.
1080 was not first discovered in Australia. It was first synthesised in a Belgium laboratory in 1896.
There was research underway in the mid-late 1860's, due to unexplained large-scale travelling livestock deaths, after they ingested Heartleaf/Poison Bush.
Australia's chief botanist at the time (Baron Ferdinand Von Meuller[Died Apr 1888], and amongst his duties, was tasked with unravelling the livestock deaths surrounding the Heartleaf bush. In effect, I suspect Baron Von Meuller might have been the gent whom identified the 1080 poison we still use today.)
I'm not suggesting it was first synthesized in Australia, but I do know that they were on the hunt for indentifying it here in Australia, over 20 years before the date you mention.
Baron Ferdinand Von Meuller was also involved in trying to establish the fate of Ludwig Leichardt; an explorer who went walkabout in Outback QLD and never came back.
MG5150 wrote:Thanks for such a detailed response! I am going to check out the ammo now.bladeracer wrote:\
That would be ridiculous, if they want to ban hunting it would be far easier to simply ban it, there'd be no point in trying to sneak it through this way.
They recently tried to ban duck hunting in Vic but faced too much of a pushback from hunters and backed off.
.
bladeracer wrote:bigpete wrote:I for one am going to start shooting depleted uranium projectiles
I bought some 5mm and 6mm tungsten rod to paper-patch for .224" and .264" bullets, very heavy and very expensive. Never could bring myself to cut it up though I don't recall the numbers now but it would give me a bullet well over 100gn that would still stabilise in an 8"-twist .223. It's 70% denser than lead, about the same as gold and DU.