duncan61 wrote:I feel compelled to weigh in.I am not sure why other shooters worry about W,A, firearm laws.I feel that we have no issues.I just went through my documents and I have over 3 million acres to shoot on in this vast state.I was reading a post on this forum where a hunter had staked out a game trail and blokes on M/C bikes went past.WTF people with H/P rifles wandering around where the public have access.What could possibly go wrong?The feeling of being on land where you are the only person with access is kinda good.I have been shooting with a buddy on a hill block near a dam just out of Waroona and someone must of called the police because they turned up.My mate panicked but I had the property letter and the Reg 6 lic to take Kangaroos and it was all good.I know it is popular on this forum to moan about the system and how we should be able to just do what we want just remember that applies to everyone on the street.I like that its not easy to just buy any firearm but it can be done if done correctly.Lets get over the reds under the bed mentality and enjoy our sport
duncan61 wrote:I was reading a post on this forum where a hunter had staked out a game trail and blokes on M/C bikes went past.WTF people with H/P rifles wandering around where the public have access.What could possibly go wrong?
duncan61 wrote:The comments I made regarding having my .222 loaded and in my possession was the topic was about having your firearms out the safe and I used the point that if you have total control you are not breaking any rules.
duncan61 wrote:Regards the loaded rifle,Sounds like I may of slipped through the net.
bladeracer wrote:duncan61 wrote:I feel compelled to weigh in.I am not sure why other shooters worry about W,A, firearm laws.I feel that we have no issues.I just went through my documents and I have over 3 million acres to shoot on in this vast state.I was reading a post on this forum where a hunter had staked out a game trail and blokes on M/C bikes went past.WTF people with H/P rifles wandering around where the public have access.What could possibly go wrong?The feeling of being on land where you are the only person with access is kinda good.I have been shooting with a buddy on a hill block near a dam just out of Waroona and someone must of called the police because they turned up.My mate panicked but I had the property letter and the Reg 6 lic to take Kangaroos and it was all good.I know it is popular on this forum to moan about the system and how we should be able to just do what we want just remember that applies to everyone on the street.I like that its not easy to just buy any firearm but it can be done if done correctly.Lets get over the reds under the bed mentality and enjoy our sport
Yep, the feeling of being on property that only you are allowed to shoot on is wonderful, if you are that shooter. Not much fun for the million other shooters that can't access such property.
I think most firearm owners are sick of fudd's that are happy as long as their personal space is not invaded by regulations, and come out with statements like this that completely ignore fellow shooters that are battling ever-increasing regulations.
The laws you keep referring to only make it harder to buy firearms LEGALLY, without having any effect at all on bad people buying whatever guns they want illegally.
You find it dangerous that we share public land with non-shooters? And yet you told a story on here about having a fully-loaded rifle when camping on a f***ing beach and the cops didn't care?????
duncan61 wrote:I prefer your definition to female urinary device or fear uncertainty doubt.I did a lot of construction and at union meeting always voted for what was best for the group not my individual needs however I am concerned about the general public having easy access to firearms.handguns in particular.We have all seen the docos on school shootings in USA however 2 things are going to happen 1.We are not the USA 2.Next time someone posts on how terrible the gun laws are in W.A. I will realise they have never been here and build a bridge and get over it
bentaz wrote:Fudds are our biggest problem next to the fact that scum bags already have pistols, which we unendingly get punished for to no good end!
duncan61 wrote:While we are on a roll.I have just read the Where can I hunt guide in Victoria and it seems very fair and reasonable.I am genuinely interested in what you had before that you dont have now that seems to be causing all the consternation.I know about the Port Arthur buy back I handed in a perfectly good semi auto .22 stirling and a Winchester 3 shot 12 gauge.I am not trying to stir the pot just some actual real concerns that need to be bought to the attention of SFFP.I have read about the doctor who wishes to disarm the public completely and he is not taken serious and i joined a local anti gun group for fun recently and their arguments were nonsensical.Their main point was that we were too powerful as a group.My current views are not popular so educate me on the looming horror
duncan61 wrote:While we are on a roll.I have just read the Where can I hunt guide in Victoria and it seems very fair and reasonable.I am genuinely interested in what you had before that you dont have now that seems to be causing all the consternation.
duncan61 wrote:I read the guide and am very interested in flying to Victoria to hunt deer.From what I gather I contact the DEPI in the area I wish to play and with the correct licenses and permits I am good to go.I have freedom and choice.The anti gun lobby argue all sorts of weird stuff its all on the net and they are their own worst enemy one claim is we should only have one firearm otherwise we will become mass murderers,We all know you need 13 fishing rods 13 golf clubs and 13 firearms.Need and want is the grey area.We need rifles to hunt and cull but the amount of firepower we can lay down has to be consistent with the task at hand.I put about 5000 rds down a Bren gun in the army and as much fun as it would be to go rabbiting its not really practical.I would like to think I have a better understanding of the situation after this discussion
duncan61 wrote:my man mike ordered and licensed a 10/22 Ruger after the buy back just to prove he could.He had to get a
letter from the property manager that he needed fast follow up shots so it can be done
duncan61 wrote:We are crossing post but I like your logic.Yeah why cant I have a Bren gun.I am going to make application
bladeracer wrote:
Choice and freedom to enjoy our recreation as we see fit without being dictated to by anti-gun rhetoric is what we've lost.
Do you believe you were a danger to the public with your semi-auto rifle and shotgun?