Oldbloke wrote:No, not tonight. The gimp mask is strictly Saturday nights only.
PS. Sounds like you young blokes need to start drinking stout.
Ar50a1 wrote:A magnum cartridge is generally an improved version of a existing cartridge not rocket science if you need more power without going up in caliber use a magnum! For those that think a magnum is just for a pissing competition go hunting in NSW national parks and see how long it is before you are wearing handcuffs as it is absolutely illegal to take a headshot and the animal welfare act is very clear about required energy for humanely dispatching feral animals 4500 ftlbs is the minimum required for aisian buff so anyone bragging about using a old 303 may want to discontinue this as is prosecutable
BTW hydrostatic shock is not achieved unless the projectile impacts at above 2600 fps!
Tripod wrote:Ar50a1 wrote:A magnum cartridge is generally an improved version of a existing cartridge not rocket science if you need more power without going up in caliber use a magnum! For those that think a magnum is just for a pissing competition go hunting in NSW national parks and see how long it is before you are wearing handcuffs as it is absolutely illegal to take a headshot and the animal welfare act is very clear about required energy for humanely dispatching feral animals 4500 ftlbs is the minimum required for aisian buff so anyone bragging about using a old 303 may want to discontinue this as is prosecutable
BTW hydrostatic shock is not achieved unless the projectile impacts at above 2600 fps!
bulls**t!
Ar50a1 wrote:A magnum cartridge is generally an improved version of a existing cartridge not rocket science if you need more power without going up in caliber use a magnum! For those that think a magnum is just for a pissing competition go hunting in NSW national parks and see how long it is before you are wearing handcuffs as it is absolutely illegal to take a headshot and the animal welfare act is very clear about required energy for humanely dispatching feral animals 4500 ftlbs is the minimum required for aisian buff so anyone bragging about using a old 303 may want to discontinue this as is prosecutable
BTW hydrostatic shock is not achieved unless the projectile impacts at above 2600 fps!
Tripod wrote:Ar50a1 wrote:A magnum cartridge is generally an improved version of a existing cartridge not rocket science if you need more power without going up in caliber use a magnum! For those that think a magnum is just for a pissing competition go hunting in NSW national parks and see how long it is before you are wearing handcuffs as it is absolutely illegal to take a headshot and the animal welfare act is very clear about required energy for humanely dispatching feral animals 4500 ftlbs is the minimum required for aisian buff so anyone bragging about using a old 303 may want to discontinue this as is prosecutable
BTW hydrostatic shock is not achieved unless the projectile impacts at above 2600 fps!
bulls**t!
Gwion wrote:Tripod wrote:Ar50a1 wrote:A magnum cartridge is generally an improved version of a existing cartridge not rocket science if you need more power without going up in caliber use a magnum! For those that think a magnum is just for a pissing competition go hunting in NSW national parks and see how long it is before you are wearing handcuffs as it is absolutely illegal to take a headshot and the animal welfare act is very clear about required energy for humanely dispatching feral animals 4500 ftlbs is the minimum required for aisian buff so anyone bragging about using a old 303 may want to discontinue this as is prosecutable
BTW hydrostatic shock is not achieved unless the projectile impacts at above 2600 fps!
bulls**t!
Which part are you calling BS on???
I personally find it hard to believe that a head shot is illegal!??!
brett1868 wrote:G, isn't the .357 Magnum and improved version of the 38 Special created by S&W in the 30's and is credited as "Starting" the magnum era of handgun ammo or have I missed something? This whole magnum non magnum argument means little to me as it has no input on my buying decisions.
brett1868 wrote:So long as it's not Cooper's Stout or you risk a case of Cooper's Droop
Shame on you. Didnt you read my earlier post. Hard, fast and big
duncan61 wrote:Thank you,I am new and really enjoy some of the information I am gaining from other shooters.The people I take shooting on my block think I am some sort of gun guru but I am in the fortunate position of knowing enough to know I know very little.The personal stuff was getting wearing and making it hard to follow the thread
brett1868 wrote:duncan61 wrote:Thank you,I am new and really enjoy some of the information I am gaining from other shooters.The people I take shooting on my block think I am some sort of gun guru but I am in the fortunate position of knowing enough to know I know very little.The personal stuff was getting wearing and making it hard to follow the thread
"You have a block" Big mistake saying that in public You'll be flooded with offers of beer and stout in return for an invite over. I'm telling you this cause I am your friend so let me know when I can come over, ignore the others
duncan61 wrote:If you have a rifle that can shoot a 50gr pill at around 3000fps in to a 80mm circle 5 times in a row you are welcome to come and do the ambush thing.Long way from the territory.On the fishing site I am on I have met a lot of shooters and made some good friends
Oldbloke wrote:I might need to be careful. I might get kicked out due to my dick size.
Gwion wrote:WAY too early for dick jokes!
bladeracer wrote:And yet head shots are required when shooting kangaroos.
https://www.environment.gov.au/biodiver ... angaroos#2
"The Code sets an achievable standard of humane conduct and is the minimum required of persons shooting kangaroos."
"Point of aim
Conditions
A shooter using a rifle must aim so as to hit the target kangaroo in the brain (see diagram in Schedule 2), except in the case of an injured or wounded animal where a brain shot may be impractical.
A shooter using a shotgun must aim so that, whether the target kangaroo is stationary or mobile, it will be hit in the head, neck or chest by the centre of the pattern."
Skadoo wrote:bladeracer wrote:And yet head shots are required when shooting kangaroos.
https://www.environment.gov.au/biodiver ... angaroos#2
"The Code sets an achievable standard of humane conduct and is the minimum required of persons shooting kangaroos."
"Point of aim
Conditions
A shooter using a rifle must aim so as to hit the target kangaroo in the brain (see diagram in Schedule 2), except in the case of an injured or wounded animal where a brain shot may be impractical.
A shooter using a shotgun must aim so that, whether the target kangaroo is stationary or mobile, it will be hit in the head, neck or chest by the centre of the pattern."
I'm not sure which point you're arguing here.
Are you saying that the law is impractical?
Or supporting the "just headshot everything" argument by quoting it?
Are we suggesting now but because a law is written that it makes sense?
That it somehow magically imbues every kangaroo shooter with Chuck Norris levels of accuracy?
Skadoo wrote:I'm not sure which point you're arguing here.
Are you saying that the law is impractical?
Or supporting the "just headshot everything" argument by quoting it?
Are we suggesting now but because a law is written that it makes sense?
That it somehow magically imbues every kangaroo shooter with Chuck Norris levels of accuracy?