TassieTiger wrote:Are 300wm reloaders crimping their projectiles? Is it because of the shallow neck?
TassieTiger wrote:Yeah - I get that GB to a degree. But when your retail is 40% better than the next persons wholesale - something doesn’t add up. I mean it’s great for consumers but as a previous small business owner, I don’t know how it is survivable
marksman wrote:I heard they import themselves so there is your saving especially if you are buying bin bulk at the same time
marksman wrote:I heard they import themselves so there is your saving especially if you are buying bin bulk at the same time
TassieTiger wrote:Yeah - I get that GB to a degree. But when your retail is 40% better than the next persons wholesale - something doesn’t add up. I mean it’s great for consumers but as a previous small business owner, I don’t know how it is survivable
TassieTiger wrote:Wouldn’t ballistics be determined by the load rather than the caliber?
SCJ429 wrote:What bullet are you planning to shoot Tassie? I have had success with the 220 ELDX.
Mark wrote:TassieTiger wrote:Wouldn’t ballistics be determined by the load rather than the caliber?
All the 300's you've named are the same Caliber ! There ballistics are determined by powder weight.
But when comparing ballistics Of different calibers. Its there charge weight vs there projectile weight efficiency.
I have both the 300wm & 260rem, love them both, enjoy your new toy
Mark wrote:TassieTiger wrote:Wouldn’t ballistics be determined by the load rather than the caliber?
All the 300's you've named are the same Caliber ! There ballistics are determined by powder weight.
But when comparing ballistics Of different calibers. Its there charge weight vs there projectile weight efficiency.
I have both the 300wm & 260rem, love them both, enjoy your new toy