.270 vs .308?

Calibres, cartridges, ballistics tables and ammunition information.

Re: .270 vs .308?

Post by Am88 » 22 Jan 2020, 11:03 am

7mm rem mag. :lol: I'll buy one one day.
Am88
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 295
Queensland

Re: .270 vs .308?

Post by flutch » 22 Jan 2020, 11:20 am

the collector wrote:.308
used by military world wide



Only because "Murica" though, all the other NATO constituents were not in favor of it.
Guns:
Rossi S/S 410
Lanber U/O 12 gauge
Adler B220PG 12 gauge
Ruger 22lr
Remington 270 win
Howa 223
Weatherby 300 Winmag

Bows:
G5 Quest Drive
G5 Prime Defy
flutch
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 447
Western Australia

Re: .270 vs .308?

Post by flutch » 22 Jan 2020, 11:27 am

RoginaJack wrote:SCJ429.. then could you explain why we and other NATO countries are using a 5.56mm round and "dare to be different", that is the problem.


both the 308 and 5.56 are out of favour with almost all of the worlds military, the 5.56 is ineffective nowadays and so is the 308, especially at any sort of range, with most opting for 300win, 338lap, 50bmg and 375 variants as they all perform will in excess of anything the sluggish loopty loo dribbling 308 haha... I imagine both the 308 and 556 will be replaced by a 6.5mm or 6.8mm cartridge, given there are way more advantages to having these in light of modern body armor and firearm tech.

look I think that the 308 is okish, but the same old arguments for it vs anything else are definitely a dead horse flogged. most people I know who had a 308 will not buy another one. but then if it suits your circumstances then get one and go bang.
Guns:
Rossi S/S 410
Lanber U/O 12 gauge
Adler B220PG 12 gauge
Ruger 22lr
Remington 270 win
Howa 223
Weatherby 300 Winmag

Bows:
G5 Quest Drive
G5 Prime Defy
flutch
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 447
Western Australia

Re: .270 vs .308?

Post by Lebner » 03 May 2020, 3:27 pm

I recently replaced a burnt model 70 in 270 with an x bolt hells canyon in 270. I killed a lot of deer with the old gun. The x bolt shoots a hell of a lot better that the mod 70 ever did. Brother replaced his burnt 6.5 Swede with a howa 1500 in 308. The Swede rolled a lot of deer, but I think the 308 will do just as good
Lebner
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 15
Victoria

Re: .270 vs .308?

Post by solarpak » 03 May 2020, 5:02 pm

The 270 and 308 have been around for a long time and will continue to do so. But the shooting industry has to keep the punters interested and constantly comes up with new calibres - its good business sense. Also new disciplines like PRC (and calibres suited to that discipline) keep things interesting.

But as a hunter, i run both the 270 and 308 - with no complaints whatsoever. Out to 300 metres - plus or minus a 100m - they work very well. I have no need to shoot at extended ranges especially when it comes to hunting deer and goats.

C.
solarpak
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 355
South Australia

Re: .270 vs .308?

Post by firstguns » 12 May 2020, 2:07 pm

So to rekindle an older thread, I'm looking at my first 'big' rifle. It needs to be Sambar-legal, not because I'm expecting to get on them in the next 12 months, but because I'd like the option, and to build a long-term package. I've heard all the stuff about the .308, but I kind of want to 'be different', and for how much I expect to be shooting the rifle, I don't mind paying slightly more for ammo.
I have a .223, so can do medium goats and probably small pigs with that, but want something that'll stretch from goats and pigs, thru to sambar, and not a .308.
Does it sound like the .270 is the go? If it weren't for the sambar requirement a 6.5 would be pretty cool, so am I way better off just parking the sambar hunting for a couple of years until I can afford a second rifle (like a .300WSM or something?). Or do I just embrace the single rifle for now and get a 270?
firstguns
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 31
New South Wales

Re: .270 vs .308?

Post by SCJ429 » 12 May 2020, 5:39 pm

What sort of budget do you have for your 270? Would this one fit the bill?

https://www.usedguns.com.au/Product.aspx?p=169130
SCJ429
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 3212
New South Wales

Re: .270 vs .308?

Post by Ziege » 12 May 2020, 7:48 pm

270 is rock solid, anyone that says otherwise is either completely misinformed, or has spent too much time reading target shooting magazine ads.

But in saying that is you wanna be different why not get a 270 Weatherby magnum? Or a 280?
Ziege
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
 
Posts: 964
Western Australia

Re: .270 vs .308?

Post by firstguns » 12 May 2020, 7:57 pm

Nice, but I'm probably 6 months away from buying, and the idea of a new rifle is calling me. I've bought used so far in my .22 and .223, and done pretty well out of both. But something about unboxing a T3x lite for the first time is pretty tempting.
firstguns
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 31
New South Wales

Re: .270 vs .308?

Post by firstguns » 12 May 2020, 8:13 pm

But in saying that is you wanna be different why not get a 270 Weatherby magnum? Or a 280?


What's the upside of a .280? Obviously a slightly larger bullet in a more 'normal' bullet diameter, and a bit more powder? So faster, and a bit harder hitting? Is ammo another step more expensive that .270? How about availability of rifles? Having a quick poke around tikkas site I couldn't see whether they produce a T3x in it, or whether I could nab a Howa barreled action in it and build something custom. Unless it's got another name too?
firstguns
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 31
New South Wales

Re: .270 vs .308?

Post by TassieTiger » 12 May 2020, 9:18 pm

If your not reloading - me personally, I’d go 270. Then, after a while when your used to that - you can jump to the 300wm or 338 or similar and you’ll have decent spacing between all your centrefires.
The 270 is a heavy hitter - it is def underestimated in many dick swinging contests.
Tikka .260 (Z5 5x25/52)
Steyr Pro Varmint .223 - VX 3
CZ455 .22 & Norinco .22 (vtex 4-12, bush 3-9)
ATA 686 U/O 12g & Baikal S/S 12g.
Adler a110 reddot
Sauer 30-06 - VX 3
Howa 300 win mag. SHV 5-20/56
Marlin SBL 45/70
TassieTiger
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3704
Tasmania

Re: .270 vs .308?

Post by Ziege » 12 May 2020, 10:38 pm

No real world advantage to the 280, just a different cartridge and altogether very similar if I were going again or to swap calibers, I'd be tempted to go 7mm rem mag, 338(something) or a 375(something)

But yeah, 270 won't do you wrong

Fun titbit, I know someone personally who has a CMC Mountaineer (howa) in 270, it's 37 years old, all parts are original, the thing has been used extensively, thousands of shots, and STL it can hit a chain link at 200m..... So don't discount a howa sporter barreled action.
Ziege
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
 
Posts: 964
Western Australia

Re: .270 vs .308?

Post by firstguns » 13 May 2020, 9:43 am

Ziege wrote:So don't discount a howa sporter barreled action.


I definitely won't - my .223 is a howa sporter (one of the old ones with a single-stage trigger and the slower barrel twist) and I like it just fine. Obviously the availability of aftermarket bits and pieces is a big draw too. I was thinking about building up a cool customised 1500 on a sporter profile and it could end up being a more fit-to-me hunting rifle with higher quality parts for about the same price as the T3x provided I was putting in the time.
firstguns
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 31
New South Wales

Re: .270 vs .308?

Post by marksman » 13 May 2020, 10:48 am

the old argument used to be that there were not as many 270 bullets as other cals, l scratch my head on that because you only need one good one
l run a 270wsm shooting 150gr sst's at 3200fps, it shoots flatter than my 6.5x284 and drops sambar like the hammer of thor
“If you do not read the newspapers you are uninformed. If you do read the newspapers you are misinformed”. Mark Twain
User avatar
marksman
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3660
Victoria

Re: .270 vs .308?

Post by firstguns » 13 May 2020, 11:41 am

marksman wrote:the old argument used to be that there were not as many 270 bullets as other cals, l scratch my head on that because you only need one good one


Thanks - I'm unlikely to reload yet (that feels like a rabbit hole that I just don't have the time to invest in), so a couple of options from factory would be great. But like you, a couple of good options is all I need. Having a hundred options (like in my .223 or .22) isn't particularly important - something for deer, and something for pigs, and I'm probably going to be happy
firstguns
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 31
New South Wales

Re: .270 vs .308?

Post by JimTom » 13 May 2020, 12:11 pm

Can get good factory ammo for either mate, in saying that, prob a bit more variety for the .308.
User avatar
JimTom
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2130
Queensland

Re: .270 vs .308?

Post by duncan61 » 13 May 2020, 12:18 pm

I have a 7mm Remington Sendero in 7mm Rem Mag I wish to sell if you are interested.With 175gn Remington core lokt or Winchester failsafes it will drop a horse size animal if the shot is right.It is stainless steel with a carbon fibre stock and 26 inch barrel.Regards Duncan
.22 winchester .22hornet .222 .243 7mm rem mag cbc 12g
User avatar
duncan61
Officer Cadet
Officer Cadet
 
Posts: 1905
Western Australia

PreviousNext

Back to top
 
Return to Calibres, cartridges and ballistics