Some experimenting with tips and boat tails

[Swarm]

Pfft, whatever. Lose the attitude.

You said it's better if tests are not overly scientific. That's plainly false. The more thorough and accurate the test the better and more useful the result. Period.

People not having the resources to perform such tests is a completely different thing and doesn't support your silly assertion that less scientific is better as a philosophy for testing procedures.

[Jack V]

Pfft, whatever. Lose the attitude.

You said it's better if tests are not overly scientific. That's plainly false. The more thorough and accurate the test the better and more useful the result. Period.

People not having the resources to perform such tests is a completely different thing and doesn't support your silly assertion that less scientific is better as a philosophy for testing procedures.

Out.

You lose your attitude sport . A test can be accurate without being ÖVERLY SCIENTIFIC " and complicated to a point that no ordinary shooter can understand it . What the OP did was very good and jerks like you are ruining the thread and his work effort .

[Swarm]

What the OP did was very good and jerks like you are ruining the thread and his work effort.

Read it again. I never uttered a syllable against SendIt, what he did, or his results. Just your comment. I guess you "cant understand".

As for attitude, you're the one that opened with 'what's your problem' and the condescension. God forbid someone question your wisdom, right?

Anyway, not wasting any more time on this so I'm out. You need to have the last word anyway so I'll leave you with it.

Keep up the good work SendIt