308w vs 3006s

Calibres, cartridges, ballistics tables and ammunition information.

Re: 308w vs 3006s

Post by Lorgar » 01 Jan 2015, 1:10 pm

North East wrote:My favourite rifle...kicks a bit but manageable.


The recoil pads are pretty decent on the Tikkas.

Bit off topic but... I have (and have had others) a Ruger Hawkeye in .308. The Hawkeye recoil pads are s**t, there is no other word for it. Too thin and too hard.

Shooting a mates T3 lite in .300 WM is easier on the should than shooting the Hawkeye .308 which has less actual recoil and is a heavier rifle.
User avatar
Lorgar
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2156
Victoria

Re: 308w vs 3006s

Post by AusC » 01 Jan 2015, 1:13 pm

Goshawk wrote:I'm mainly going to use it for fallow...


Mate, .308 is plenty for fallow. Plenty.

Absolutely no need for a 30-06 for them. Same yourself the money and the shoulder stress IMO.

Dunno if we're talking about a different purpose now when you mentioned .338, but that's definitely getting silly for hunting fallow deer.
300 Win Mag Tikka T3 Lite.
4-12x42 Zeiss Terra.
User avatar
AusC
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 526
Victoria

Re: 308w vs 3006s

Post by North East » 01 Jan 2015, 1:21 pm

Like others have said, a .30-06 is to much gun for chasing fallow. Only really needed if you intend to have a go at Sambar further down the track.

If fallow are the only thing on the menu a .243 would suffice.
Browning BL-22 lever action...open sights
T3 Varmint .204 Ruger...Meopta Meostar 4-16X44
T3 Lite .30-06 Sprg...Aimpoint Hunter 1X red dot

....that will do me
North East
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 685
Victoria

Re: 308w vs 3006s

Post by Oldbloke » 01 Jan 2015, 5:52 pm

AusC wrote:
Goshawk wrote:I'm mainly going to use it for fallow...


Mate, .308 is plenty for fallow. Plenty.

Absolutely no need for a 30-06 for them. Same yourself the money and the shoulder stress IMO.

Dunno if we're talking about a different purpose now when you mentioned .338, but that's definitely getting silly for hunting fallow deer.


+1 but if he has ideas for other game in the future a 308 (or something else) may be the go. You can always use mild loads.
A 338 in a light weight rifle is looking to get a good kick in the shoulder. I'm not sure why 338 and bigger rounds are so popular, 7 mm, 303s, 308s. 270s, and 3006s (and you could name a few other popular rounds) all get the job done with good placement, and legal for almost any animal in all states. (I think? Might get corrected here.)
The greatest invention in the history of man is beer.
https://youtu.be/2v3QrUvYj-Y
Member. SFFP, Shooters Union.
SSAA, the powerful gun lobby. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Hunt safe.
User avatar
Oldbloke
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 11293
Victoria

Re: 308w vs 3006s

Post by Goshawk » 01 Jan 2015, 7:54 pm

AusC wrote:
Goshawk wrote:I'm mainly going to use it for fallow...


Mate, .308 is plenty for fallow. Plenty.

Dunno if we're talking about a different purpose now when you mentioned .338, but that's definitely getting silly for hunting fallow deer.


I mainly shoot fallow but I have seen some sambar and big reds too, I have never tried them due to using my trusty 243w which feels quite small when you see how thick these deer can get.

I was thinking the short 338 federal (338cal in 308 brass) would throw enough weight for these guys but decided against it as it would be a pain sourcing ammunition and decent brass.

Sounds like the 308 will be enough for my tasks.

Thanks everyone for the advice!
Goshawk
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 117
Australian Capital Territory

Re: 308w vs 3006s

Post by North East » 01 Jan 2015, 8:12 pm

If you have your heart set on a .308 use 130gn pills for the fallow and 150gn pills for Sambar and Reds...I prefer 180gn but the 150gn pills will do the job.
Browning BL-22 lever action...open sights
T3 Varmint .204 Ruger...Meopta Meostar 4-16X44
T3 Lite .30-06 Sprg...Aimpoint Hunter 1X red dot

....that will do me
North East
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 685
Victoria

Re: 308w vs 3006s

Post by Oldbloke » 01 Jan 2015, 8:30 pm

North East wrote:If you have your heart set on a .308 use 130gn pills for the fallow and 150gn pills for Sambar and Reds...I prefer 180gn but the 150gn pills will do the job.


+1
The greatest invention in the history of man is beer.
https://youtu.be/2v3QrUvYj-Y
Member. SFFP, Shooters Union.
SSAA, the powerful gun lobby. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Hunt safe.
User avatar
Oldbloke
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 11293
Victoria

Re: 308w vs 3006s

Post by AusC » 02 Jan 2015, 11:49 am

Goshawk wrote:I mainly shoot fallow but I have seen some sambar and big reds too, I have never tried them due to using my trusty 243w which feels quite small when you see how thick these deer can get.

I was thinking the short 338 federal (338cal in 308 brass) would throw enough weight for these guys but decided against it as it would be a pain sourcing ammunition and decent brass.

Sounds like the 308 will be enough for my tasks.


I agree, .308W will be the best all-rounder for you.

It's more than needed for Fallow without going well overboard, and if you cross paths with a Sambar half decent shot placement with the .308 and it will drop no problem.

Give the .338 a miss ;)
300 Win Mag Tikka T3 Lite.
4-12x42 Zeiss Terra.
User avatar
AusC
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 526
Victoria

Re: 308w vs 3006s

Post by wrenchman » 02 Jan 2015, 12:06 pm

what a lot of guys do here is if you live were you can hunt multi specis they hunt with a round that will work well on all like the 180 and hunt it all you might be over guned in some case but meat in the pot is what counts
wrenchman
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1347
United States of America

Re: 308w vs 3006s

Post by North East » 02 Jan 2015, 12:17 pm

wrenchman wrote:what a lot of guys do here is if you live were you can hunt multi specis they hunt with a round that will work well on all like the 180 and hunt it all you might be over guned in some case but meat in the pot is what counts


That's the advantage of the .30-06...the variety of projectile weights you can run through it or like you say just stick to a 180gn.
Browning BL-22 lever action...open sights
T3 Varmint .204 Ruger...Meopta Meostar 4-16X44
T3 Lite .30-06 Sprg...Aimpoint Hunter 1X red dot

....that will do me
North East
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 685
Victoria

Re: 308w vs 3006s

Post by Goshawk » 02 Jan 2015, 6:03 pm

I'm hoping to run just one weight round. I have found the 80gr barnes tsx (I think, bloody acronyms) punches and nice hole through fallow. Hopefully a 130gr 308 version will do the same to reds and sambar.
Goshawk
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 117
Australian Capital Territory

Re: 308w vs 3006s

Post by VICHunter » 03 Jan 2015, 11:52 am

I'd say that'll do the trick.
User avatar
VICHunter
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 623
Victoria

Re: 308w vs 3006s

Post by MalleeFarmer » 28 Jan 2015, 2:42 pm

The .308 will do everything the 06 will do in a short action only real difference is when you get to 180-200g then you'll need the 06. The 08 was designed to replicate the 06 in a short action Cartridge.
"Agriculture is our wisest pursuit, because it will in the end contribute most to real wealth, good morals and happiness." Thomas Jefferson
User avatar
MalleeFarmer
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 627
Victoria

Re: 308w vs 3006s

Post by North East » 28 Jan 2015, 3:02 pm

MalleeFarmer wrote:The .308 will do everything the 06 will do in a short action only real difference is when you get to 180-200g then you'll need the 06. The 08 was designed to replicate the 06 in a short action Cartridge.


That's the advantage....with 150-180g and above.

See if you can get hold of a copy of Errol Masons latest magazine "Secrets of the Sambar"....a very interesting article on the .30-06.
Browning BL-22 lever action...open sights
T3 Varmint .204 Ruger...Meopta Meostar 4-16X44
T3 Lite .30-06 Sprg...Aimpoint Hunter 1X red dot

....that will do me
North East
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 685
Victoria

Re: 308w vs 3006s

Post by KWhorenet » 28 Jan 2015, 6:16 pm

Goshawk wrote:I'm hoping to run just one weight round. I have found the 80gr barnes tsx (I think, bloody acronyms) punches and nice hole through fallow. Hopefully a 130gr 308 version will do the same to reds and sambar.



What's the minimum projectile weight for Fallow in the ACT?
User avatar
KWhorenet
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 679
-

Re: 308w vs 3006s

Post by VICHunter » 28 Jan 2015, 6:26 pm

I'm assuming he meant 180gr TSX in the comment above since we're talking .30 cal.

Not 80gr? Typo?
User avatar
VICHunter
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 623
Victoria

Re: 308w vs 3006s

Post by KWhorenet » 28 Jan 2015, 6:35 pm

VICHunter wrote:I'm assuming he meant 180gr TSX in the comment above since we're talking .30 cal.

Not 80gr? Typo?


Out of a .243 the 80gr would sound right. Don't know why I asked now when I think of it. If I go to ACT this year I'll have 30cal anyway.
User avatar
KWhorenet
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 679
-

Re: 308w vs 3006s

Post by Supporter » 29 Jan 2015, 2:43 pm

Not good news going by SSAA website...

Australian Capital Territory

Hunting is limited to feral animals on private property with landowners’ permission to hunt on the property. The ACT doesn’t have any species currently classified as game that can be taken by recreational hunters.

Only a current firearms licence is required to hunt on private property. There is no hunting permit or fee applicable. Juniors between the age of 12 and 18 years can apply for a minors firearm permit.

The following animals are some of the species classified as feral and can be taken.

Rabbit
Hare
Fox
Pig
Goat
Feral cat
Feral dog


:unknown: :(
Winchester 1894 30-30
Howa Varminter .204 Ruger
Savage Model 10/110 Trophy Hunter XP 30-06 Springfield
User avatar
Supporter
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 249
Western Australia

Re: 308w vs 3006s

Post by North East » 29 Jan 2015, 2:47 pm

You better move to Vic fellas....it's open season down here.
Browning BL-22 lever action...open sights
T3 Varmint .204 Ruger...Meopta Meostar 4-16X44
T3 Lite .30-06 Sprg...Aimpoint Hunter 1X red dot

....that will do me
North East
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 685
Victoria

Re: 308w vs 3006s

Post by Warrigul » 29 Jan 2015, 3:47 pm

North East wrote:You better move to Vic fellas....it's open season down here.


We get two short seasons here in TAS, bloody things are pests and it should be all out war.
Warrigul
Warrant Officer C2
Warrant Officer C2
 
Posts: 1103
-

Re: 308w vs 3006s

Post by Jack V » 29 Jan 2015, 5:48 pm

If you are going very short with the barrel then a 308 is a better choice than 30-06 . The shorter case ( powder column ) will burn faster powders better .
If you fire a 30-06 using slow powders in a short barrel most of the energy is lost in the air and it could be not much better than a 308 . Also a lot of powder burning as a large muzzle flash is very noisy and could also affect accuracy .
Most factory ammo is designed for 22 to 26 inch barrels not 16 inch . 180 grain bullet is a bit too heavy for 308 case and if you are going to go short barrel and faster powders then heavy bullets show pressure signs quicker . I would go with the lighter range of bullets 130 to 150 with the faster powder for the cartridge. Plenty of bullet for Fallow and have a few 165 grain bonded bullets for Sambar .
Jack V
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 693
New South Wales

Re: 308w vs 3006s

Post by North East » 29 Jan 2015, 5:55 pm

Jack V wrote:If you are going very short with the barrel then a 308 is a better choice than 30-06 . The shorter case ( powder column ) will burn faster powders better .
If you fire a 30-06 using slow powders in a short barrel most of the energy is lost in the air and it could be not much better than a 308 . Also a lot of powder burning as a large muzzle flash is very noisy and could also affect accuracy .
Most factory ammo is designed for 22 to 26 inch barrels not 16 inch . 180 grain bullet is a bit too heavy for 308 case and if you are going to go short barrel and faster powders then heavy bullets show pressure signs quicker . I would go with the lighter range of bullets 130 to 150 with the faster powder for the cartridge. Plenty of bullet for Fallow and have a few 165 grain bonded bullets for Sambar .


By the time you work all that crap out might as well go for the .30-06. :drinks:
Browning BL-22 lever action...open sights
T3 Varmint .204 Ruger...Meopta Meostar 4-16X44
T3 Lite .30-06 Sprg...Aimpoint Hunter 1X red dot

....that will do me
North East
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 685
Victoria

Re: 308w vs 3006s

Post by Jack V » 29 Jan 2015, 6:07 pm

No , for his situation 308 is the better short barrel choice .
Jack V
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 693
New South Wales

Re: 308w vs 3006s

Post by VICHunter » 30 Jan 2015, 9:20 am

North East wrote:You better move to Vic fellas....it's open season down here.


Sound advice :D
User avatar
VICHunter
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 623
Victoria

Re: 308w vs 3006s

Post by Gwion » 30 Jan 2015, 2:16 pm

If you are mega keen on a short barrel but like the over all feel and features of another rifle, it doesn't cost much to have the barrel lopped and re-crowned by a competent smith. Get it threaded at the same time for a muzzle brake to ease recoil a bit. Shortening a long barrel will give you a stouter barrel than a factory shorty in a lot of instances, from the spec comparisons i've been doing lately.

Oh yeah, expect the shorty to be LOUD.
User avatar
Gwion
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3978
-

Re: 308w vs 3006s

Post by jordy » 31 Jan 2015, 4:08 pm

Gwion wrote:Oh yeah, expect the shorty to be LOUD.


That they are.

A 16.5 is a real blast to the face.
jordy
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 41
South Australia

Re: 308w vs 3006s

Post by Goshawk » 14 Mar 2015, 7:22 pm

North East wrote:Who needs magnification. This will get you out to 300 yards with no parallax error. The tape over the muzzle is a Victorian thing...just shoot it off.

Hey north east, what size dot has your scope got? Looks like the exact setup is want but thinking of 308 or 270 now, used my mates 3006 tikka and found it had a fair bit of kick,... Maybe I should take my floral dress off and man up.
Goshawk
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 117
Australian Capital Territory

Re: 308w vs 3006s

Post by North East » 14 Mar 2015, 9:10 pm

2 MOA red dot.
Browning BL-22 lever action...open sights
T3 Varmint .204 Ruger...Meopta Meostar 4-16X44
T3 Lite .30-06 Sprg...Aimpoint Hunter 1X red dot

....that will do me
North East
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 685
Victoria

Re: 308w vs 3006s

Post by Grrzrr » 18 Mar 2015, 1:17 pm

jordy wrote:A 16.5 is a real blast to the face.


And the guy next to you :lol:
User avatar
Grrzrr
Private
Private
 
Posts: 97
New South Wales

Re: 308w vs 3006s

Post by chrispy88 » 20 Mar 2015, 7:34 am

Don't mean to take off topic but can someone please explain the tape? Just to keep crud out of the bore while matching through the scrub?
Tikka T3 Lite SS .308 / VXII 3-9x40
Howa HB SS .223 / Viper PST 4-16x50
Savage Mk II BTVS .22LR / VXI 3-9x40
Lithgow Model 1 .22LR
Miroku MK10 Sporter 12g
W. W. Greener Martini action 12g
chrispy88
Private
Private
 
Posts: 79
New South Wales

Next

Back to top
 
Return to Calibres, cartridges and ballistics