tony m wrote:300's are considered light these days
Not me-I'm a.270 win guy..We have a good population of Grizzlies here and this is probably the reasonElek wrote:tony m wrote:300's are considered light these days
You guys trying to kill game there or make it explode
GLS_1956 wrote:The market place will decide what stays and what goes. The 222Remington and the 222Remington Magnum have been pretty much replaced by the 223Remington. The 22/250 is the reigning 4000pfs champ. The 243 Win is popular but some still hold the 244/6mm Remington in high regard. Still a good number of 30 cal fans. But you don't see many boxes of 300H&H on the shelves.
<<Genesis93>> wrote:the raw materials are at their lowest in 5 to 7 yrs
Spooner wrote:<<Genesis93>> wrote:the raw materials are at their lowest in 5 to 7 yrs
You're referring to the lead smelters shutting down a while back?
dhv wrote:Hmm, how long before "sporadic supply of ammunition" is considered a good reason on a PTA for something new?
We live with Grizzlies , whe their not denned up in the winter.They kill alot of our chickens, pigs etc during this time.It is not unusual to see them around the farm house.I would say more bears have been killed with a 30/30 than anything else.These bears are hard to hit , they are lightening quick and the quicker the rifle to the shoulder the better.The .270 win is a ideal elk /moose rifle providing we use a premium bullet.I am a mountain hunter-the rifle got to be light and maneuverable. If a guy was to pick a defensive Grizzly gun a 12ga is a better choice imo.You gotta hit the thing.<<Genesis93>> wrote:Tony, 270 for Grizzlies??? Here in Sambar land the 270win has for a long time been a standard Sambar Round, 30-06,303, 308 the norm.... nowaday its really considered a minimum entry to our biggest deer specie, by law the 0.270 calibre is even the recognised minimum...Although its recognised that smaller chambering are more than adequate;
I can't believe you would face a Grizzlie with one.... me? I would want to have nothing less than a 4inch high explosive tipped missile, launched from California... or at least a 338mag/UM.... in Alaska I recall the (foresrtry service?) recommended being 375H&H, that a good balance of medicine
thread back from the dead.....
<<Genesis93>> wrote:Tony, 270 for Grizzlies???
tony m wrote:We live with Grizzlies , whe their not denned up in the winter.They kill alot of our chickens, pigs etc during this time.It is not unusual to see them around the farm house.I would say more bears have been killed with a 30/30 than anything else.These bears are hard to hit , they are lightening quick and the quicker the rifle to the shoulder the better.The .270 win is a ideal elk /moose rifle providing we use a premium bullet.I am a mountain hunter-the rifle got to be light and maneuverable. If a guy was to pick a defensive Grizzly gun a 12ga is a better choice imo.You gotta hit the thing.<<Genesis93>> wrote:Tony, 270 for Grizzlies??? Here in Sambar land the 270win has for a long time been a standard Sambar Round, 30-06,303, 308 the norm.... nowaday its really considered a minimum entry to our biggest deer specie, by law the 0.270 calibre is even the recognised minimum...Although its recognised that smaller chambering are more than adequate;
I can't believe you would face a Grizzlie with one.... me? I would want to have nothing less than a 4inch high explosive tipped missile, launched from California... or at least a 338mag/UM.... in Alaska I recall the (foresrtry service?) recommended being 375H&H, that a good balance of medicine
thread back from the dead.....
happyhunter wrote:One is that certain countries like france ban the use 5.56x45mm and 7.62x51
Homer wrote:I have seen this thread but this is the first time I've looked at it!