southeast varmiter wrote:Just got my new 338 win mag for Sambar - should be enough
And then some
southeast varmiter wrote:Just got my new 338 win mag for Sambar - should be enough
Outdoorsguy wrote:Curiously the gunstore also suggested I might actually try heavier 180 grain ammo. Ballistically, they travel more slowly and may also a happy be a better choice on fallow?!
Outdoorsguy wrote:I'm a very new rifleman. I own a 308 purchased for 'deer shooting'. I recently shot my first 2 fallow with this rifle using 150grn sellier & bellot spce soft points. The exiting projectile has been devastating on my venison. I wish I owned a sharp shooting .243, I imagine an 80-90 grain well placed projectile would've been plenty of pill.
Not wanting to buy another rifle for an already rifle... i called my gunstore today asking for a solution, I was advised a solid Barnes like projectile might be just as lethal but less destructive on my meat, when my marksmanship improves further I'll try to take nec shots. Curiously the gunstore also suggested I might actually try heavier 180 grain ammo. Ballistically, they travel more slowly and may also a happy be a better choice on fallow?!
When I eventually come across some Sambar I know a well placed 308 projectile will do the job.
Hope this helps you try learn as I am that there can be different ways of finding hunting solutions.
Oldbloke wrote:Then work up loads that are slow for fallow, say about 2300fps and faster for everything else, say about 2600fps. That should cover all your needs provided the groups are reasonable. Only catch is the change of zero.
bigfellascott wrote:The 204's good enough for my needs.
Sleepy_Hunter wrote:I just recently purchased a Sauer 101 in 9.3x62 so hopefully i can get out soon and test it on sambar, I have heard many good things about the calibre.
bladeracer wrote:bigfellascott wrote:The 204's good enough for my needs.
Which states allow deer shooting with .204?
Possibly with a monolithic bullet it'd be fairly reliable but why wouldn't you buy a more effective caliber to do the job?
WayneO wrote:A 150g bullet from a .308 will probably be doing somewhere around 2600 to 2700 fps so yes its going to damage a lot of meat. A 180g bullet will be traveling at around 2250 to 2300 fps so the meat damage will be significantly less.
Think of it like this.
Open a heavy strongroom door, then clench your fist and slowly make contact with the door while pushing it closed.
Then
Open the door, clench your fist wind back and strike the door as hard and as fast as you can.
going slowly leaves your hand in perfect condition, going fast..................
Its the same as bullet performance on tissue and bone.
One of my favorite bush-veld rifle is a .458 Win Mag with synthetic stock, 20" barrel and a 4-12 x 40 Lynx scope. The reason I like this caliber is because it launches a 500g bullet at a nice slow 1950fps, and on small animals like Bushbuck and Impala, (Fallow and Chital deer) you can take a shoulder shot and end up throwing away next to no meat. You can also take big animals like Eland and Sambar and the bullet will give you more than 1.5m penetration on a frontal chest shot. However its a short range rifle with max distance of around 150m.
To sum it up, light for caliber bullets are great for long range hunting but make mince at close range, heavy for caliber bullets are great for close range work, but drop off considerably at longer ranges.