300WSM or 30-06

Calibres, cartridges, ballistics tables and ammunition information.

300WSM or 30-06

Post by Mick280 » 23 Mar 2015, 8:01 pm

Had my sights set on a Model 70 Supergrade in 30-06 while now.
A bloke I met up at the range the other day turfed a bloody spanner in the works by informing me that Win do a F/Weight in 300WSM, Didnt know this(Probably due to my own ignorance).
The thing is , Im looking at a cal that will handle 180 g Accubonds with a bit of punch to use on camels & scrub bulls and Im a bit of a skirt when it comes to recoil.
Any thoughts?
Not enough Lever Gunsll
Mick280
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 233
New South Wales

Re: 300WSM or 30-06

Post by North East » 23 Mar 2015, 8:12 pm

The .300WMS kicks more than a .30-06. The .30-06 will still kill anything in this country.
Browning BL-22 lever action...open sights
T3 Varmint .204 Ruger...Meopta Meostar 4-16X44
T3 Lite .30-06 Sprg...Aimpoint Hunter 1X red dot

....that will do me
North East
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 685
Victoria

Re: 300WSM or 30-06

Post by Oneshot270 » 23 Mar 2015, 8:26 pm

If you hate recoil don't buy a .300 MAG I had a light weight Kimber Custom in .300 WIN MAG great gun but it would boot ya and I sure ain't a small fella.
"One shot one kill"
Remington 700 ADL .270 WIN Burris 3-9x40
1917 BSA No1 Mk3 .303 Brit
Marlin 336CS 30-30 WIN Redfield 2-7x33
Remington 700 SPS .223 Bushnell 4-16x40
CZ452 .22LR Nikko Stirling 6x40
Mossberg 395 12ga
Boito O/U Nickel 12ga
Oneshot270
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 9
Western Australia

Re: 300WSM or 30-06

Post by Mick280 » 23 Mar 2015, 8:43 pm

Dont hate recoil , Just a bit past it !
Used to have a Sako 85 in 338 Win , Kicked like a mule !
Have shot a mates S/Grade in 300 Win Mag plenty of times , borderline !
Just like to be comfortable with what Im shooting and would prefer a short action.
Not enough Lever Gunsll
Mick280
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 233
New South Wales

Re: 300WSM or 30-06

Post by Combat_Wombat » 23 Mar 2015, 8:56 pm

Always see plenty of the WSM for sale on the gun classifieds and most I pretty cheap. If you are going for the featherweight model a muzzle brake will probably be on the cards.
Remington 700 CDL .270
Rossi M92 44mag
CZ 452 deluxe .22LR
Howa 1500 .204
Savage FVSR 22
User avatar
Combat_Wombat
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 379
Queensland

Re: 300WSM or 30-06

Post by North East » 23 Mar 2015, 9:06 pm

Mick280 wrote:Dont hate recoil , Just a bit past it !
Used to have a Sako 85 in 338 Win , Kicked like a mule !
Have shot a mates S/Grade in 300 Win Mag plenty of times , borderline !
Just like to be comfortable with what Im shooting and would prefer a short action.


.30-06 is a long action...but it comfortable to shoot...a great calibre...no horrific recoil with it.
Browning BL-22 lever action...open sights
T3 Varmint .204 Ruger...Meopta Meostar 4-16X44
T3 Lite .30-06 Sprg...Aimpoint Hunter 1X red dot

....that will do me
North East
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 685
Victoria

Re: 300WSM or 30-06

Post by Oldbloke » 23 Mar 2015, 9:15 pm

Lots a powder + heavy projectile + light rifle = lots of recoil.
Heavier rifle = less recoil
less powder or lead = less recoil.

All things being equal, the above is true, to state the obvious. You cant beat it, its just about physics.

3006 should do the trick, subject to shots are well placed and suitable projectle for the task.
The greatest invention in the history of man is beer.
https://youtu.be/2v3QrUvYj-Y
Member. SFFP, Shooters Union.
SSAA, the powerful gun lobby. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Hunt safe.
User avatar
Oldbloke
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 11317
Victoria

Re: 300WSM or 30-06

Post by Mick280 » 24 Mar 2015, 10:38 am

Just leaning towards the F/Weight because coupled with a Zeiss 3.5-10x40 and Talley 1 piece rings , Its about the ideal weight for a walk around for me.
Have shot a 30-06 in a T3 Light plenty of times , Handled it ok and the Mod 70 is a bit heavier than the T3.
Not enough Lever Gunsll
Mick280
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 233
New South Wales

Re: 300WSM or 30-06

Post by 1290 » 24 Mar 2015, 12:54 pm

Mick, theres no free lunch.... if you want to launch a projectile with lots of grunt... its going to recoil. If you want a lighter rifle - you're going to to increase the felt recoil.

When you say youve shot the 300 and the 338 mags; if you shoot it a lot - you'll get used to it!

I'm sure the 30-06 will be enough for the scrub bulls and humpy things...but I would personally be a lot more confident hitting them with at least the 338Winmag and a decent hunting proj..... and for the 100fps over the 308, is it worth another 30cal (you list a 308 there)

The 45-70 would be ideal, if you're not too far out,
User avatar
1290
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1336
Victoria

Re: 300WSM or 30-06

Post by Mick280 » 24 Mar 2015, 8:08 pm

Still waiting on the 45-70 , Im told it will be here the beginning of next month.
Will be using it for range work mainly I think , Single Action - Pat Garrett Match and a SSAA RANGE near us has a 1000 yard buffalo shoot I want to have a crack at.
33 inch barrel , Might be a bit heavy to cart around the bush and being single shot the follow ups if needed might be a bit steady !
Not enough Lever Gunsll
Mick280
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 233
New South Wales

Re: 300WSM or 30-06

Post by BBJ » 25 Mar 2015, 8:41 am

Mick280 wrote:The thing is , Im looking at a cal that will handle 180 g Accubonds with a bit of punch to use on camels & scrub bulls and Im a bit of a skirt when it comes to recoil.


.30-06 will shoot 180gr well obviously.

Appropriate bullets like the Accubonds on camels no prob.

I wouldn't say it's too small for a bull hunt - stressing suitable projectile and careful shot placement - but I definitely wouldn't turn my nose up at something bigger for that task.

You've got decent line up already there, is this to be a dedicated bull rifle? Or a general rifle to sometimes be used on bull?

Which way is it?

If you're adding this to the safe just for bull hunting, personally I'd look at something a little bigger.
Weatherby Vanguard .223 Remington
Tikka T3 Varmint Stainless .243 Winchester
R.I.P. M1 Garand .30-06 Springfield

Leupold VX-R 4-12x40
User avatar
BBJ
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 347
Northern Territory

Re: 300WSM or 30-06

Post by Tiiger » 25 Mar 2015, 8:44 am

Mick280 wrote:Just leaning towards the F/Weight because coupled with a Zeiss 3.5-10x40 and Talley 1 piece rings , Its about the ideal weight for a walk around for me.


As said 1,000 times lighter right = more recoil. blah blah.

No one enjoys recoil, if you'll be shooting it enough the recoil is more than you can put up with sticking a brake on is the obvious solution.

Will make the 300WSM like .243 level recoil.
User avatar
Tiiger
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 347
Queensland

Re: 300WSM or 30-06

Post by Mick280 » 26 Mar 2015, 11:02 am

Thank fo your comments everyone , Very helpful !
Have an overseas hunt or two in the planning stages so I think the WSM might do the trick.
Not enough Lever Gunsll
Mick280
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 233
New South Wales

Re: 300WSM or 30-06

Post by handofcod » 26 Mar 2015, 1:06 pm

My tikka hunter in 300WSM recoils just fine with a good limbsaver pad. It's really not that bad. I wouldn't think it would be too much more than a 30-06 anyway, given equal rifle and projectile weight.
CZ452 22lr | Remington 5R Milspec in .223 | Tikka Hunter in 300wsm | Ruger Scout in .308
User avatar
handofcod
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 185
Victoria

Re: 300WSM or 30-06

Post by Korkt » 26 Mar 2015, 2:08 pm

handofcod wrote:I wouldn't think it would be too much more than a 30-06 anyway, given equal rifle and projectile weight.


In energy terms is about 15% - 20% more recoil.

Felt recoil's a different thing though. A good pad does wonders there as we know.
User avatar
Korkt
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 265
New South Wales

Re: 300WSM or 30-06

Post by Timb0 » 27 Mar 2015, 12:03 pm

Oneshot270 wrote:If you hate recoil don't buy a .300 MAG I had a light weight Kimber Custom in .300 WIN MAG great gun but it would boot ya and I sure ain't a small fella.

I was Looking at a model 70 but bought a kimber instead. Big mistake. Worsed gun I have owned!
Marlin XT22 .22lr, Ruger M77/22 .22wmr, Rem 7615 .223, Ruger M77 .223, Weatherby MarkV .243, Rem 700 VLS .243, Kimber Montana .270, Weatherby MarkV .270Wby mag, Rem 700 .308, Khan ATac 12ga.
Timb0
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 152
Queensland

Re: 300WSM or 30-06

Post by Timb0 » 27 Mar 2015, 12:12 pm

Oh, and a model 70 extreme weather in 300wsm is top of the list for my next rifle.
Two mates of mine shoot .300 mags. One a rem 700 in a WSM and the other a .300 win mag in a ruger, similar wieght rifle and I can't tell the difference in recoil. Both fine in the field without a break. Not excellent on the bench.
Marlin XT22 .22lr, Ruger M77/22 .22wmr, Rem 7615 .223, Ruger M77 .223, Weatherby MarkV .243, Rem 700 VLS .243, Kimber Montana .270, Weatherby MarkV .270Wby mag, Rem 700 .308, Khan ATac 12ga.
Timb0
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 152
Queensland

Re: 300WSM or 30-06

Post by Combat_Wombat » 27 Mar 2015, 12:12 pm

Timb0 wrote:
Oneshot270 wrote:If you hate recoil don't buy a .300 MAG I had a light weight Kimber Custom in .300 WIN MAG great gun but it would boot ya and I sure ain't a small fella.

I was Looking at a model 70 but bought a kimber instead. Big mistake. Worsed gun I have owned!


Why is that exactly? I only know a couple of blokes who own them but they absolutely love them.
Remington 700 CDL .270
Rossi M92 44mag
CZ 452 deluxe .22LR
Howa 1500 .204
Savage FVSR 22
User avatar
Combat_Wombat
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 379
Queensland

Re: 300WSM or 30-06

Post by Timb0 » 27 Mar 2015, 12:37 pm

In the light weight models the firing pin seems too light and doesn't seem to set off certain brands of primers, no bottom plate so you can't dump your mag, the bolt knob comes up very close to the eye piece on the scope ( yes could be the scope I have tried two though), there is a screw for firing pin depth at the back of the bolt that comes loose if you don't loctite it from factory or if you adjust it causing misfires, the montana stock is rough on your face and if your an unshaven bum like me occasionally pulls your whiskers, the stock i have only been told is a foam with Kevlar outer layer, so if you go to bed the action you can't really cut into the stock to take the compound. It might be just me making a bad choice but the rifle barrel weight is too light for me.
Marlin XT22 .22lr, Ruger M77/22 .22wmr, Rem 7615 .223, Ruger M77 .223, Weatherby MarkV .243, Rem 700 VLS .243, Kimber Montana .270, Weatherby MarkV .270Wby mag, Rem 700 .308, Khan ATac 12ga.
Timb0
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 152
Queensland

Re: 300WSM or 30-06

Post by North East » 27 Mar 2015, 3:32 pm

I'm over recoil too. I can tolerate it in a 6.4 Ibs T3 Lite .30-06 but any more is just not a pleasure to shoot.

The .30-06 Sprg will do over anything in this country...where I live anyway.
Browning BL-22 lever action...open sights
T3 Varmint .204 Ruger...Meopta Meostar 4-16X44
T3 Lite .30-06 Sprg...Aimpoint Hunter 1X red dot

....that will do me
North East
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 685
Victoria

Re: 300WSM or 30-06

Post by aekpani » 28 Mar 2015, 7:03 pm

Hi,

.300WSM will be better to hunt with. I use limbsaver pad and a muzzle break, it performs well.

Throw a eliminator scope and you will be fine ONE shot ONE kill :)

Regards,
AA
Weapons are beautiful

Marlin XT-22 VR in .22LR, Leupold 3-9x40mm
Rossi Rio Grande (stainless) in .30-30 Win
Tikka Lite in .300 WSM, Nikon prostaff 3-9x40
Mosin Nagant 91/30 in 7.62 x 54r
Hammerli 208 target pistol in .22LR
Steyr LP10 Air .177
User avatar
aekpani
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 41
Queensland

Re: 300WSM or 30-06

Post by Mich » 29 Mar 2015, 6:09 pm

aekpani wrote:.300WSM will be better to hunt with. I use limbsaver pad and a muzzle break, it performs well.


Not knocking your .300 WSM, but "better"? Wouldn't say it's that cut and dry.

I don't see any .30-06 rounds bouncing off deer here. Know what I mean.
User avatar
Mich
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 182
United States of America

Re: 300WSM or 30-06

Post by Oldbloke » 29 Mar 2015, 7:03 pm

Mich wrote:
aekpani wrote:.300WSM will be better to hunt with. I use limbsaver pad and a muzzle break, it performs well.


Not knocking your .300 WSM, but "better"? Wouldn't say it's that cut and dry.

I don't see any .30-06 rounds bouncing off deer here. Know what I mean.


North east will love you.
The greatest invention in the history of man is beer.
https://youtu.be/2v3QrUvYj-Y
Member. SFFP, Shooters Union.
SSAA, the powerful gun lobby. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Hunt safe.
User avatar
Oldbloke
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 11317
Victoria

Re: 300WSM or 30-06

Post by bunnybuster » 29 Mar 2015, 8:11 pm

The 30-06 has been/will be around forever,brass readily available,from Milsurp to top dollar commercial,available widely,I suspect the WSM fails here.Cost of dies ?

Recoil,if the same weight projectile is fired at the same velocity in either cartridge from identical rifles,the recoil will be the same.

Now here's a spanner for the works,an 8 x 57 in a surplus '98 :thumbsup: will do all a 30-06 can.

Be Safe BB

P.S sorry for y'all with broken muzzles,I would use a brake if neccesary. :sarcasm:
bunnybuster
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 151
Western Australia

Re: 300WSM or 30-06

Post by Mich » 30 Mar 2015, 8:45 am

Oldbloke wrote:North east will love you.


I've a lovable kind of guy :lol:
User avatar
Mich
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 182
United States of America

Re: 300WSM or 30-06

Post by 1290 » 30 Mar 2015, 3:09 pm

Mich wrote:
aekpani wrote:.300WSM will be better to hunt with. I use limbsaver pad and a muzzle break, it performs well.


Not knocking your .300 WSM, but "better"? Wouldn't say it's that cut and dry.

I don't see any .30-06 rounds bouncing off deer here. Know what I mean.


Yeah, but you havent seen VICTORIAN deer.... :D
User avatar
1290
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1336
Victoria

Re: 300WSM or 30-06

Post by Mich » 31 Mar 2015, 9:04 am

Only photos.

I wouldn't say no to a shot at one of your Sambar ;)
User avatar
Mich
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 182
United States of America

Re: 300WSM or 30-06

Post by tony m » 02 Nov 2015, 10:43 pm

I would pick the 30/06 .The short fats usually don't chamber quite as well, tougher to find ammo or components for too.Use a Barnes, Swift or Nosler partition and it will penetrate.Just my opinion
tony m
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 29
Canada

Re: 300WSM or 30-06

Post by <<Genesis93>> » 03 Nov 2015, 2:09 pm

tony, we'll have to start calling you lazarus, brining these old threads back to life.....

As far as the OP goes, different kettle of the proverbial...

300wsm design to replicate the winmag in a wanky short round...(a solution to a problem other seek to convince us we possess)

between the 300wsm and the aught six...

I choose the 300WinMag!

The WSMs will come and go... the WSSM will follow... the RCMs, what are they? the RUMs will stay - cause theyre just a heap more of a good thing...
<<Genesis93>>
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2191
-

Re: 300WSM or 30-06

Post by Mick280 » 03 Nov 2015, 8:50 pm

Wow Narky!!
What's so wrong about bringing old threads back to life???
You can never have too many points of view!!!
I'm a 65 model and love learning something new every day!!!
Not enough Lever Gunsll
Mick280
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 233
New South Wales

Next

Back to top
 
Return to Calibres, cartridges and ballistics