Lorgar wrote:I'd give the bonded bullets a miss for this though. They're good but twice the price of anything else in the list and complete overkill for fallow.
David Brown wrote:One other point, for fallow deer we have been head shooting them at 100-150 or so metres using that 223 ammo. No meat damage issues.
But you need to be accurate.
David Brown wrote:One other point, for fallow deer we have been head shooting them at 100-150 or so metres using that 223 ammo. No meat damage issues.
But you need to be accurate.
insanity wrote:Thanks guys will be mostly head shooting for meat anyway but just wanted to be shore I would be right if that big stag steps out!
David Brown wrote:I have just started loading my 6.5 and 308 and 30-06 with Nosler accubonds. they are not cheap, so I hope they work well.
Lorgar wrote:David Brown wrote:I have just started loading my 6.5 and 308 and 30-06 with Nosler accubonds. they are not cheap, so I hope they work well.
Accubond are a great bullet, I've pulled a handful out of tree stumps and the like, and the expansion and weight retention is as good as you could ask for.
They're expensive yeah, but you can rest easy knowing they'll do the trick.
GLS_1956 wrote:Okay you've spent $600 on the rifle, $300 on the scope, $200 pair of binoculars, $300 on boots and clothing, what ever the licenses and permits cost. And now you're griping on spending a few dollars of the item that kills the deer?
WayneO wrote:I have never understood why people complain about the cost of bullets.
MattyP wrote:The problem I find with any lead free projectile is the excessive length of the projectile you loose either case capacity and you need a fast twist rifling to get them to stabilize.
insanity wrote:Hi new to the sight and have a question just bought a tikka 270 for deer hunting and was wondering whats the best projectile would be best for the job? Any advice would be apreciated
Cheers Daniel
Lyam wrote:Haven't heard a bad word about the Accubonds other than that there a little expensive.