"Clean" vs "Dirty" Ammunition

Calibres, cartridges, ballistics tables and ammunition information.

"Clean" vs "Dirty" Ammunition

Post by zobster » 04 Jan 2016, 2:34 pm

Hi guys,

Could someone educate me the difference between clean and dirty ammunition please.

In another section of the forum in one of my post a reply commented that fiocchi was a "dirtier" ammunition therefore causes my chamber to be fouled.

I was just wondering, how to you tell apart clean and dirty ammunition? By brands? By trial and error?
What does the "dirty" in dirty ammunition imply anyways? The powder not burning cleanly? Humidity affecting my ammunition? It cannot be external dirt because I always wipe my cartridges with a slightly oiled rag before loading. My ammunition is always stored together with Damp Rid.
zobster
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 221
Tasmania

Re: "Clean" vs "Dirty" Ammunition

Post by AusTac » 04 Jan 2016, 4:42 pm

Pretty much the bi product of burning whatever powder chemicals happen to be loaded in the case, and as every brand uses different powders some will burn cleaner and more wholy than others just like an engine, i personally only shoot factory at the moment but just through trial and error you get the know the dirty ammo which is usually cheaper but not always the case

Those that re load will probably be able to chime in with alot more technical data
Certified part time hillbilly
User avatar
AusTac
Warrant Officer C2
Warrant Officer C2
 
Posts: 1171
-

Re: "Clean" vs "Dirty" Ammunition

Post by Wm.Traynor » 04 Jan 2016, 7:05 pm

zobster wrote: I always wipe my cartridges with a slightly oiled rag before loading. .


Please don't do that mate. Your cartridges will not be able to grip the walls of the chamber and the backthrust against the locking lugs will be increased. I don't know what the long term consequences of that would be but it is completely unnecessary and potentially harmful to your rifle.
Wm.Traynor
Sergeant Major
Sergeant Major
 
Posts: 1651
Queensland

Re: "Clean" vs "Dirty" Ammunition

Post by Oldbloke » 04 Jan 2016, 10:06 pm

Trail and error and what AusTac said.
The greatest invention in the history of man is beer.
https://youtu.be/2v3QrUvYj-Y
Member. SFFP, Shooters Union.
SSAA, the powerful gun lobby. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Hunt safe.
User avatar
Oldbloke
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 11315
Victoria

Re: "Clean" vs "Dirty" Ammunition

Post by pomemax » 05 Jan 2016, 12:05 am

I think you may be referring to a comment i made, on a post about cases getting stuck or something like that . easy way to check the burning of any case is look inside the empty case after firing if it has burnt clean case is clean if its a dirty burn the case is dirty when its dirty the gasses go around into the chamber and deposit particles on the walls and bolt and your rifle / pistol gets dirty quicker .
I was shooting 9mm a a range one day forget the name of the rounds but the smoke coming from the Beretta the range office came in and asked what powder I had in them they thought I may have loaded them with blackpowder by mistake but they were factory I was cleaning the pistol for about 1 hour just to get it clean a lot of crud from the rounds
Yes its just try it and see i have seen 2 pistols shot with the same ammo one was clean after 100 rounds the other the guy cleaned to dirty after 50 same ammo same brand of pistol and they we're burning different in the chamber you could see inside the spent cases on dark grey the other shinny brass looking
pomemax
Warrant Officer C2
Warrant Officer C2
 
Posts: 1165
New South Wales

Re: "Clean" vs "Dirty" Ammunition

Post by zobster » 05 Jan 2016, 8:58 am

I think I understand what you are saying.

One brand of ammunition sometime might burn differently between different rifles which results in good/bad burn which is essentially a clean/dirty burn.

Might have to start handloading as I've yet to find a brand of ammo that my 223 likes. Perhaps the powder might burn cleaner compared to the powder in factory ammunition.
zobster
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 221
Tasmania

Re: "Clean" vs "Dirty" Ammunition

Post by Oldbloke » 05 Jan 2016, 1:48 pm

"Might have to start handloading as I've yet to find a brand of ammo that my 223 likes. Perhaps the powder might burn cleaner compared to the powder in factory ammunition."

I purchased 100 rounds of S&B ( cheap at the time) for my 223 when I picked it up. Shot very dirty indeed. Grouped like a 12g as well.
Now reloading with AR2208 and much cleaner and very happy with the 0.6 moa.
The greatest invention in the history of man is beer.
https://youtu.be/2v3QrUvYj-Y
Member. SFFP, Shooters Union.
SSAA, the powerful gun lobby. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Hunt safe.
User avatar
Oldbloke
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 11315
Victoria

Re: "Clean" vs "Dirty" Ammunition

Post by Norton » 06 Jan 2016, 9:31 am

Wm.Traynor wrote:Please don't do that mate. Your cartridges will not be able to grip the walls of the chamber and the backthrust against the locking lugs will be increased. I don't know what the long term consequences of that would be but it is completely unnecessary and potentially harmful to your rifle.


If I recall correctly that .338 blowup which hospitalised a guy at Little River in Victoria a while was was (in part) attributed to lubed hot loads.

Consequence was the lugs let go and he copped the bolt in the face.
CZ 550 American Safari Magnum in .416 Rigby

Other puny calibre rifles... What man would want you now?
User avatar
Norton
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
 
Posts: 838
Queensland

Re: "Clean" vs "Dirty" Ammunition

Post by Norton » 06 Jan 2016, 9:32 am

zobster wrote:One brand of ammunition sometime might burn differently between different rifles which results in good/bad burn which is essentially a clean/dirty burn.


Yep.

Just like burning two different fuels, one may have a little more residue/waste left over.

Comes into plan on a rifle because instead of it puffing out into the atmo it's building up in your barrel.
CZ 550 American Safari Magnum in .416 Rigby

Other puny calibre rifles... What man would want you now?
User avatar
Norton
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
 
Posts: 838
Queensland

Re: "Clean" vs "Dirty" Ammunition

Post by BBJ » 13 Jan 2016, 9:32 am

You can see / smell it easily enough on some ammo.

PPU is decent ammo as far as putting a bullet in a target but dirty as, distinct smell when shooting and noticeably more gaseous debris.
Weatherby Vanguard .223 Remington
Tikka T3 Varmint Stainless .243 Winchester
R.I.P. M1 Garand .30-06 Springfield

Leupold VX-R 4-12x40
User avatar
BBJ
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 347
Northern Territory

Re: "Clean" vs "Dirty" Ammunition

Post by Manimal » 21 Jan 2016, 1:43 pm

zobster wrote:I was just wondering, how to you tell apart clean and dirty ammunition? By brands? By trial and error?


More fouling in the barrel after less shots.

And usually it's as obvious as a bit more, bit darker smoke when fired than cleaner burning ammo.
User avatar
Manimal
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 145
New South Wales

Re: "Clean" vs "Dirty" Ammunition

Post by happyhunter » 21 Jan 2016, 4:18 pm

.
Last edited by happyhunter on 16 Feb 2017, 9:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
happyhunter
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1303
Other

Re: "Clean" vs "Dirty" Ammunition

Post by southeast varmiter » 21 Jan 2016, 6:36 pm

From my experience the difference is that dirty ammo is where the propellant byproduct is corrosive. Cheap Chinese ammo is notorious for this.
So when you use dirty ammo you need to clean your firearm as soon as possible after firing.
southeast varmiter
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 272
Victoria

Re: "Clean" vs "Dirty" Ammunition

Post by zobster » 22 Jan 2016, 8:02 am

happyhunter wrote:So far have never found a factory load that burns as clean as my hand loads using ADI powders.


Been running OSA 223 for the last 2 trips, I think they are loaded using ADI powder as well. There's significantly less "black" stuff when I scrub out the bore using the bronze brush but the bolt seems "dirtier" when compared to when I was running PPU. But nonetheless, the gun doesn't run ppu now so it's just OSA now. :thumbsup:
zobster
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 221
Tasmania

Re: "Clean" vs "Dirty" Ammunition

Post by ebr love » 10 Feb 2016, 11:05 am

I'm not 100% on this but on a few observations of ammo with primer and projectile sealant that seems to add a little smoke as well.
TIKKA T3 TAC .300 WIN MAG
HOW SPORTER 270 WIN
HOWA YOUTH .204 RUGER
MARLIN 1889 .38-40
User avatar
ebr love
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 306
New South Wales

Re: "Clean" vs "Dirty" Ammunition

Post by Wm.Traynor » 10 Feb 2016, 11:23 am

Australian military ammo that used the 7.62mm 144gn bullet was "sealed" (to make it waterproof?) and the Fullbore blokes needed a fancy mixture to make their barrels competitive against the Canadians. I do not know if this applies to all military ammo.
Wm.Traynor
Sergeant Major
Sergeant Major
 
Posts: 1651
Queensland

Re: "Clean" vs "Dirty" Ammunition

Post by Wobble » 16 Feb 2016, 11:26 am

Sealants were generally used to protect against moisture, yes.
Weatherby Vanguards in .300 Weatherby Magnum and .243 Winchester
User avatar
Wobble
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 268
Western Australia


Back to top
 
Return to Calibres, cartridges and ballistics