sungazer wrote:The 243 is known as a barrel burner. That .243 wssm sounds like a wild fire. life must be short.
AZZA'S HJ47 wrote:Considering purchasing a rifle in a obsolete calibre projectiles are available in every gun shop and very affordable. Brass however is still produced but expensive and from what ive heard can be scarce at times.
Anybody on here shoot "forgotten" cartridges care to add there 2 cents.
For the record the rifle is a 222 Rem Mag im considering. The other consideration is to always rebarrel to a 204 ruger.
My grandfather had a 222 rem mag and loved it obviously we have progressed sine then however i do like "diffrent" things that turn the odd head
Thanks in advance gents
deanp100 wrote:I searched far and wide to eventually find an original Brno 222 mag. Don't you dare rechamber to 223. Cases are always available, buy a couple of hundred and go your hardest. 100 cases should last a long time.
AZZA'S HJ47 wrote:I wouldn't mate if anything 222 re mag Ackley improved now theres none something you dont see every day![]()
Id imagine it would have simler ballistics compared to a 22 nosler
RoginaJack wrote:222 rem Mag; it's a fantastic and still a very potent performer on small game.
I thought the 204 was just a fancy name for the 222 Rem. mag.
A fellow fox shooter had a Mannlicher Rifle in 222mag; shoot flies of pigs at 300yds!
COLLECTOR 1 wrote:A Brno in 222mag... you have my attention... never seen or heard of one.... any chance of a photo of the rare beast.....
Coll
AZZA'S HJ47 wrote:Still in the consideration pile i love my 222 and could only imaging that the 222 rem mag would just be a more beefed up 222 with a longer neck for better concentricity than a 223. I have a large work bonus comming my way it may be the next one for my collection.