
Duramax wrote:They say a picture is worth a thousand words. Top photo is from a US manufactured barrel about to be fitted tomorrow. Bottom photo is a TSE barrel I refused to fit. Just not worth the trouble and it seems the same philosophy from the Graham Bugden era of MAB has carried on to the current owner. Graham told me years ago that the "chatter" was an accuracy advancement that was used to good effect by some South African mob. Well that and the continued use of 416 that was way too soft for chambers with thin tenon walls was the end for me. Graham did some very good rimfire barrels for me back in the day but only after insistence they be lapped to remove the corrugated road effect.
Why people are not using Alan Swan's barrels is beyond me. Very well priced, good lead time and the young lad has really put the effort into getting good steel and the latest technology. Neville still makes a great barrel but his manner at times and lead times has put a lot of people off. Many may not know that Neville's barrels have been fitted to some top name rifles in the US which has meant for a long time we here are fed what we can get if we can get it. Shame really as I consider his barrels equal to any US manufacturer barring Krieger.. They are without doubt the best barrel statistically I have used. Never had an ordinary one which says a lot about cut barrels versus pull or push button rifling.



Duramax wrote:Neville Madden of MADDCO. Agree that a few years ago Swan barrels were somewhat a lucky dip. His son does the barrels now, new gear, steel and process. Different outcome.
Was it a chromemoly or stainless barrel in the 358?





CJRBOLTGUN1 wrote:after reading the entire thread I'm none the wiser ,i know of a few names, I was considering having some barrel work done but all this secret squirrel s**t doesn't help someone filter out the dodgy pricks and like most i cant afford to go through the headache of being done over,who are you guys refering too


Wapiti wrote:Yes but Rich the bloke is basically saying that the secret squirrel stuff of not naming names means how does he know who NOT to use, or to get more info on?

Smiley wrote:I've tried a few others, but have no experience with TSE. Can anyone here give a report?

Maxjon wrote:Smiley wrote:I've tried a few others, but have no experience with TSE. Can anyone here give a report?
Yes they are excellent! I had a 223 Omark TSE barrel it was the most accurate rifle ive ever owned! I will be buying again!


bigrich wrote:Wapiti wrote:A word of warning,
The son of a mate down the road on a cropping joint bought a Tikka M55 222 that was in good nick except for a worn out barrel, he had it rebarrelled down at a place between Bris and Warwick.
They offered him a second-hand super heavy stainless 22-250 barrel cheap, just pay for cutting off the old chamber, rethread/chamber and fit to 223, so he accepted.
He just got it back and outwardly it looked OK.
His dad asked me to come down because he wanted some advice on setting it up in a small lathe he'd bought, and when helping out I found that one, he didn't have all the gear he needed to set it up and two, when I brought some stuff down to show him how to clock the barrel straight on the bore at one end and the chamber at the other (has to be on the bore centreline, including the action centreline, not the external) , the action was running out by 15 thou at the end. That was cut that way by the supposed gunsmith.
The barrel also had a big flat milled in it at the chamber end, this was at the 4.30 o'clock position on the knox, hidden by the stock.
I can only assume it was put there to allow a big objective scope bell to clear this massive barrel, as it's virtually straight from the action. There's no way it was put there to tighten the barrel in, that would indicate a smith without the correct gear. He wanted to bed it and asked whether it might cause an issue in trapping the barrel into the compound.
Disclaimer - I'm not working on any other persons guns or modifying them whatsoever, that's not legal here unless one is licensed as an "armourer" in Qld and I'm not, nor would I want to. He's in NSW anyway. I was merely showing him basic lathe setting up principles and how not to bodgy stuff up. He did this to have a look for why things weren't going so well, and in doing so he found out that not all "gunsmiths" that charge for their work bother to do a straight job.
Maybe it was a Friday arvo job, or one "training the apprentice"?
yeah there's some dodgy smiths out there , no doubt about it . i stick with my old mate up in toowoomba . if the smith who did the job on the 223 is who i think your referring to , i'd get the chamber looked at and the headspace checked as this was a frequent problem with that smiths work . tikka m55's are a nice bit of gear too, only issue with them is getting replacement extractors if their worn out, or magazines
