

i would also like to know if the end of the rear stock on a No1 MK3 enfeild that goes in the "socket" near the trigger is the same as the MH rear stock where it fits into the action . any opinions or insight in the martini henry would be appreciated

No1Mk3 wrote:G'day bigrich, the extractor on a martini Henry works the same as any other falling block or break open gun of the period and a custom made extractor will remove the 7x57R with ease, just as the period Cape Guns and single and double barrel rifles did. I have borrowed a M-H in 30/30 that worked flawlessly. I was once going to build a rifle as you plan in 7x65R, even bought the cases but never got any further. The butt stock option won't work though, too differrent without major reshaping so stick to the Martini wood or get one of the custom hunting butt stocks, Cheers.
No1Mk3 wrote:Just a thought for something different, what about going up instead of down? There used to be a 303/35 once, and there is still a good choice of 35 caliber bullets available from Hornady spitzer through Rem Core Lokt to Barnes Triple Shock. Go big, bigrich!
Oldbloke wrote:I know it's ho, hum. But must be an option out there for 308cal.
308, cheap and plenty, plenty of options. Far for variety than 7mm. Yes, a tad less efficient than 7mm but the beasts will not complain.
308 Marlin express?
LawrenceA wrote:Something left of centre.
The 6.8SPC rimmed.
the SPC is based on the 30 remington which is basically a rimless 30/30.
Sooo you could have a rimmed 6.8Remington SPC Rimmed.
It'd be unique
dnedative wrote:Just keep in mind that if your shooting modern 303 ammunition in a martini your shooting proof loads.
Put enough through one and you will probably crack the rear of the receiver, the Turkish had the same issues with their peabody martini's when they decided to convert them to 7.65x53, they ended up brazing reinforcement plates to both sides of the receiver at the rear.
Anything over 303 chamber pressure and bolt thrust is a bad idea, it will beat the gun to death.
LawrenceA wrote:If you want 7mm but a little less than 7X57 then 7-30 Waters would do it but so would loading down.
bigrich wrote:Oldbloke wrote:I know it's ho, hum. But must be an option out there for 308cal.
308, cheap and plenty, plenty of options. Far for variety than 7mm. Yes, a tad less efficient than 7mm but the beasts will not complain.
308 Marlin express?
yeah , want to keep it simple with rimmed cases . also want to use a low preasure older cartridge as well . my rifle is 142 years old after all . i had considered 30-30win . cheap and easy . i could use ballistic tip projectiles as well . but 303 has more to offer . 7x57R more again
dnedative wrote:The parker hale and BSA sights for the full size martini's are rare as all f***, every couple of years one will pop up for sale if your lucky.
Better off drilling the receiver for the PH25B sight off a BSA international martini, they pop up for sale far more often, just got to get one that comes with the dovetail which the sight mounts on.
LawrenceA wrote:Too easy
Good luck with the sight.
Just watch your pressures.
Took out new to me Martini Enfield and SMLEmk3's last weekend.
Remington factory loads were pretty damn hot.
Hard to extract with the Mk111 and pressure signs in both.
bigrich wrote:i've decided to keep it simple . a mate has offered to sell me a heap of 303 reloading gear , so i've ordered a new no1 mk3 H barrel from tbone shipwright . now , anyone got a bsa martini tang sight they want to sell me
N.Field wrote:bigrich wrote:i've decided to keep it simple . a mate has offered to sell me a heap of 303 reloading gear , so i've ordered a new no1 mk3 H barrel from tbone shipwright . now , anyone got a bsa martini tang sight they want to sell me
If this is what you're after I can sell you one that's in very similar condition.
Looks like it will mount okay on a MH:
gunnnie wrote:I have an 1896 dated ME that's been rebarreled to 303 in very good nick with a 7-8/10 bore.
You can run yours as a cast pill thrower with 200-220gn pills over a mild charge of AR2207. I use CBE's 200gn bore riding style projectiles, powder coated & the load shoots very well out to 300m.
bigrich wrote:how many grains of 2207 ? i have 2207 and can get my hands on some lead projectiles , hawksbury river i think
in2anity wrote:bigrich wrote:how many grains of 2207 ? i have 2207 and can get my hands on some lead projectiles , hawksbury river i think
If you plan on running the 180gr GC pill, with a gas check added I'd probs go up to 1900fps. Otherwise without a gas check 1600fps is probably maximum speed, before you'll start seeing gas cutting (and poor accuracy). The 30-30 Single Action data on the ADI website for AR2207 will give you some strong clues into rough area... it's going to be somewhere close to those numbers. BR I can crunch in Quickload if you like to see if i can get close to those velocities?
LawrenceA wrote:If you gas check and powdercoat you can go up to 2400ish. Paper patch and just keep going to 3000 plus.
Solid lead pills do good on ferals.
bigrich wrote:LawrenceA wrote:If you gas check and powdercoat you can go up to 2400ish. Paper patch and just keep going to 3000 plus.
Solid lead pills do good on ferals.
Mmmm, too much work for me. The lead projectiles that interest me are the 180gn coated target hawks from Hawkesbury. I would be looking at 1500fps with no gas check to keep it simple. Any quicker and I’ll just use copper jackets 150’s or 174’s are where I’m looking. Especially the 174 hornady RN