Westy wrote:^^^^^^^ Hey Apollo
You are welcome to come hunting\shooting with me anytime Apollo nice to see I'm not the only one who hates the idea of safety's on rifles, my old man drummed it into us we were the safety catch and not to trust something someone else we didn't know had made. I mean just ask the boys at Remington at present their in a world a pain over someone else's stupidity!!!!
I also agree. The safety as it's called is no excuse for carrying a rifle with a chambered round and the bolt closed. I'm sure there are probably situations where it's safe but I see no benefit in it.
As for modifying the sako safety. I've never seen it but IMHO it MAY and I stress may cause grief is the firearm is ever scrutinised in the end editable situation of an accidental discharge where people or property is injured or damaged. If you are found to have removed or disabled a firearms "safety" feature it could open you up to unwanted attention.
Not to mention another situation where you register for a government shooting program for example and they require a gunsmiths certificate that the firearm is safe. I'd guess that the smith might knock it back if the safety is modified but I'm not a gunsmith.
You may also reduce the value if the gun but that's of no concern if you plan on keeping it as most sako owners do
Anyway more to the point, where's the pics of the rifle and what colour are you going to coat it?
Chronos
Edit: I forgot to mention if a rifle has an internal mag a 3 position safety is essential so you can empty the magazine safely by cycling the bolt. A problem overcome by having a floorplate that drops the rounds out of the mag.