Daypack VS bumbag

Equipment and accessories for shooting. Safes, firearm storage, bipods, carry cases, slings etc.

Daypack VS bumbag

Post by wild goose » 12 Jan 2015, 10:58 pm

You have camp set up, going out for a full days hunt. You want to pack all the essentials for a full day including a bit of gear should things not go to plan.

Do you pack you DAYPACK or BUMBAG (or similar type thingy)?

Which one and why/preferences?
Gamo Shadow 22Air
Marlin XT22
AyA 12g s/s
Howa 1500 308w
wild goose
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 28
Victoria

Re: Daypack VS bumbag

Post by North East » 12 Jan 2015, 11:04 pm

You will not fit jack s**t into a bumbag.
Browning BL-22 lever action...open sights
T3 Varmint .204 Ruger...Meopta Meostar 4-16X44
T3 Lite .30-06 Sprg...Aimpoint Hunter 1X red dot

....that will do me
North East
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 685
Victoria

Re: Daypack VS bumbag

Post by wrenchman » 13 Jan 2015, 8:24 am

stick with the day pack better to have it and not need it then need it and not have it
wrenchman
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1347
United States of America

Re: Daypack VS bumbag

Post by cruze82 » 13 Jan 2015, 8:32 am

I use my old issue webbing when just going for a short walk around , you still get the advantage of the backpack style straps but all the weight is down on your hips and it feels well balanced
User avatar
cruze82
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 177
Western Australia

Re: Daypack VS bumbag

Post by 1290 » 13 Jan 2015, 9:26 am

Is a bumbag a 'fanny pack' kind of thing?
theyre for the metrosexual type aren't they? ;)

What are you carrying? a bottle, snacks, gps, ammo....they'll fit in a sturdy (or 2) ex-mil pouch hung off a webbing belt.
User avatar
1290
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1336
Victoria

Re: Daypack VS bumbag

Post by AusC » 14 Jan 2015, 10:00 am

Bum-bag just gets in the way and doesn't hold much.

Slim profile back pack's a better option.
300 Win Mag Tikka T3 Lite.
4-12x42 Zeiss Terra.
User avatar
AusC
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 526
Victoria

Re: Daypack VS bumbag

Post by ebr love » 14 Jan 2015, 10:02 am

North East wrote:You will not fit jack s**t into a bumbag.


:thumbsup:

Day pack.
TIKKA T3 TAC .300 WIN MAG
HOW SPORTER 270 WIN
HOWA YOUTH .204 RUGER
MARLIN 1889 .38-40
User avatar
ebr love
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 306
New South Wales

Re: Daypack VS bumbag

Post by Tiiger » 14 Jan 2015, 10:02 am

For what you can fit in a BB you might as well put it in your pockets.
User avatar
Tiiger
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 347
Queensland

Re: Daypack VS bumbag

Post by sally-bee » 14 Jan 2015, 10:03 am

1290 wrote:Is a bumbag a 'fanny pack' kind of thing?
theyre for the metrosexual type aren't they? ;)


Not if they're in camo? :lol:
User avatar
sally-bee
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 127
South Australia

Re: Daypack VS bumbag

Post by Bourt » 14 Jan 2015, 10:04 am

Get a 2 or 3 litre camel pack.

Only ads a couple of inches to your back so won't get in the way, more distributed weight than having a heavy water bottle in one pocket and there are options with a few pockets built in that would hold the same as a bumbag.
User avatar
Bourt
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 559
Queensland

Re: Daypack VS bumbag

Post by Jack V » 14 Jan 2015, 11:46 am

The main issue with a true Military style bum bag is they trip you over if you need to run at full pace . Some bum bags are actually just belt pouches at the rear and worn much higher up . They are ok as far as balance goes. However a small day pack is way better as you can carry more with less strain on your waist and it's quick and easy to drop the pack when you need to rest . Weight around the waist will fatigue you faster than the same weight distributed over the shoulders .
Jack V
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 693
New South Wales

Re: Daypack VS bumbag

Post by VICHunter » 14 Jan 2015, 2:00 pm

Just me here, but anything that sits out like a bum bag does I'm always catching on trees or whatever as you slide past.

Shooting in the forest anyway.

Open field hunting not a problem. I'm voting for the backpack too though.
User avatar
VICHunter
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 623
Victoria

Re: Daypack VS bumbag

Post by Oldbloke » 14 Jan 2015, 4:36 pm

I'm different. Shoulder bag. Lol. Never liked back packs and the bum bag I have is too small. Also shoulder bag you can grab what u want any time without taking it off.
The greatest invention in the history of man is beer.
https://youtu.be/2v3QrUvYj-Y
Member. SFFP, Shooters Union.
SSAA, the powerful gun lobby. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Hunt safe.
User avatar
Oldbloke
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 11307
Victoria

Re: Daypack VS bumbag

Post by Oldbloke » 14 Jan 2015, 4:44 pm

I'm different. Shoulder bag. Lol. Never liked back packs and the bum bag I have is too small. Also shoulder bag you can grab what u want any time without taking it off.
The greatest invention in the history of man is beer.
https://youtu.be/2v3QrUvYj-Y
Member. SFFP, Shooters Union.
SSAA, the powerful gun lobby. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Hunt safe.
User avatar
Oldbloke
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 11307
Victoria

Re: Daypack VS bumbag

Post by tom604 » 14 Jan 2015, 4:52 pm

three times old bloke :lol: full day hunt, both the bum bag and the backpack, but i do carry a lot of water, two 600mil bottles wont cut it for a full day so i carry extra in the backpack ;)
User avatar
tom604
Warrant Officer C2
Warrant Officer C2
 
Posts: 1053
South Australia

Re: Daypack VS bumbag

Post by Oldbloke » 14 Jan 2015, 8:55 pm

3 times. Lol. Just driving my point home. :D ;) I love samsung.
The greatest invention in the history of man is beer.
https://youtu.be/2v3QrUvYj-Y
Member. SFFP, Shooters Union.
SSAA, the powerful gun lobby. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Hunt safe.
User avatar
Oldbloke
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 11307
Victoria

Re: Daypack VS bumbag

Post by Oldbloke » 14 Jan 2015, 8:58 pm

The irish samsung tab is at it again. To be sure, to be sure.
The greatest invention in the history of man is beer.
https://youtu.be/2v3QrUvYj-Y
Member. SFFP, Shooters Union.
SSAA, the powerful gun lobby. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Hunt safe.
User avatar
Oldbloke
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 11307
Victoria

Re: Daypack VS bumbag

Post by brett1868 » 14 Jan 2015, 11:00 pm

I have both and it depends what rifle I'm grunting around as to which pack I use. Small rille on sling I prefer a day pack, big rifle I prefer bumbag as I use a biathlon sling which rules out using a daypack. I carry 2 700ml canteens no matter which pack I'm using cause you can survive without food but without water you're soon f***ed.
How's my posting?
Complaints, Concerns - 13 11 14
User avatar
brett1868
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 3017
New South Wales

Re: Daypack VS bumbag

Post by wild goose » 14 Jan 2015, 11:09 pm

brett1868 wrote:I have both and it depends what rifle I'm grunting around as to which pack I use. Small rille on sling I prefer a day pack, big rifle I prefer bumbag as I use a biathlon sling which rules out using a daypack. I carry 2 700ml canteens no matter which pack I'm using cause you can survive without food but without water you're soon f***ed.


Thanks brett1868

I have recently started to carry my water in a stainless steel (unpainted) canteen with titanium mug around the base as these also allow me to boil water/cook should the need occur. Have always used a bladder or the plastic Nalgene bottles but have recently made the switch to metal.
Gamo Shadow 22Air
Marlin XT22
AyA 12g s/s
Howa 1500 308w
wild goose
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 28
Victoria

Re: Daypack VS bumbag

Post by Jack V » 15 Jan 2015, 9:17 am

It depends a lot on what type of hunting. If you chase pig dogs then you don't want anything flapping about or long straps hanging down that will hang you up on the scrub as you run through it . I have seen a couple of injuries that way even got hurt myself once. The neat fitting back pack is best for that. If you stalk deer then it's no as frantic as chasing dogs so other options could work ok . You have to look real hard at what you actually do and tailor your gear to suit that .
20 years down the track you have suffered enough failures to know exactly what you need . There is so much technology now a days that it is very easy to be over equipped .
Jack V
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 693
New South Wales

Re: Daypack VS bumbag

Post by Monty » 15 Jan 2015, 1:12 pm

Working hard to rack up the post count there Oldbloke :lol:
Obligatory moderator signature: If you can't play by the rules, don't let the door hit you on the way out.
User avatar
Monty
Moderator
 
New South Wales

Re: Daypack VS bumbag

Post by Skadoo » 15 Jan 2015, 1:14 pm

Jack V wrote:It depends a lot on what type of hunting. If you chase pig dogs then you don't want anything flapping about or long straps hanging down that will hang you up on the scrub as you run through it . I have seen a couple of injuries that way even got hurt myself once.


Done that once.

Moving at a good pace then ziiiiiip. Suddenly wearing a belt 5 notches too small.
User avatar
Skadoo
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 103
South Australia

Re: Daypack VS bumbag

Post by Jack V » 15 Jan 2015, 7:17 pm

Skadoo wrote:
Jack V wrote:It depends a lot on what type of hunting. If you chase pig dogs then you don't want anything flapping about or long straps hanging down that will hang you up on the scrub as you run through it. I have seen a couple of injuries that way even got hurt myself once.


Done that once.

Moving at a good pace then ziiiiiip. Suddenly wearing a belt 5 notches too small.


Yeah it pulls you up pretty quick.

In the jungle they have this barbed vine they call Gotyou vine and boy don't that grab you like a octopus on heat and a million tiny hooks dig into your skin.

You lay there in agony until they can cut you out with secateurs and knives .
Jack V
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 693
New South Wales

Re: Daypack VS bumbag

Post by Combat_Wombat » 15 Jan 2015, 8:13 pm

I have both but have been using the bum bag with a camel back a lot more. Carry a knife small first aid kit and a few rounds of ammo in both but the backpack is only there if I'm taking lunch out.

I know the "R" word is a bit scary to you old farts but bumbag wins every time where running is involved.
Remington 700 CDL .270
Rossi M92 44mag
CZ 452 deluxe .22LR
Howa 1500 .204
Savage FVSR 22
User avatar
Combat_Wombat
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 379
Queensland

Re: Daypack VS bumbag

Post by Warrigul » 15 Jan 2015, 8:16 pm

I know it is daggy but I now use a vest similar to a fly fishermans. Spreads substantial loads far better and doesn't impede me at all.
Warrigul
Warrant Officer C2
Warrant Officer C2
 
Posts: 1103
-

Re: Daypack VS bumbag

Post by Jack V » 15 Jan 2015, 8:24 pm

Combat_Wombat wrote:I have both but have been using the bum bag with a camel back a lot more. Carry a knife small first aid kit and a few rounds of ammo in both but the backpack is only there if I'm taking lunch out.

I know the "R" word is a bit scary to you old farts but bumbag wins every time where running is involved.


Well it can't be a true military bum bag then.
Jack V
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 693
New South Wales

Re: Daypack VS bumbag

Post by Combat_Wombat » 15 Jan 2015, 8:47 pm

Jack V wrote:Well it can't be a true military bum bag then.


Can't say for sure because I've only used a civvy one but I'm not carrying anywhere as much weight as the army lads would.

My observation is that I don't really feel the weight shifting while you run when it's hanging off your hips but a full bag bounces around too much and is a pain in the arse.
Remington 700 CDL .270
Rossi M92 44mag
CZ 452 deluxe .22LR
Howa 1500 .204
Savage FVSR 22
User avatar
Combat_Wombat
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 379
Queensland

Re: Daypack VS bumbag

Post by effex » 16 Jan 2015, 10:00 am

Warrigul wrote:I know it is daggy but I now use a vest similar to a fly fishermans. Spreads substantial loads far better and doesn't impede me at all.


Well, you're not there to impress the Roos with your fashion sense are you :thumbsup:
effex
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 38
Northern Territory

Re: Daypack VS bumbag

Post by anthillinside » 17 Jan 2015, 11:26 am

effex wrote:
Warrigul wrote:I know it is daggy but I now use a vest similar to a fly fishermans. Spreads substantial loads far better and doesn't impede me at all.


Well, you're not there to impress the Roos with your fashion sense are you :thumbsup:

Roo-ROFL.jpg
Roo-ROFL.jpg (1.69 MiB) Viewed 6467 times

:lol: :lol: :lol:
There's always room for at least one more gun in my safe.
There's always room for one more safe in my house.
User avatar
anthillinside
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 375
Victoria

Re: Daypack VS bumbag

Post by Oldbloke » 17 Jan 2015, 10:01 pm

Jack V wrote:You lay there in agony until they can cut you out with secateurs and knives


I often cary a small pair of those in my kit for the blackberries, bloody great. :thumbsup:
The greatest invention in the history of man is beer.
https://youtu.be/2v3QrUvYj-Y
Member. SFFP, Shooters Union.
SSAA, the powerful gun lobby. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Hunt safe.
User avatar
Oldbloke
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 11307
Victoria

Next

Back to top
 
Return to Shooting accessories and equipment