Minimum caliber ?

Game hunting and large prey. Deer stalking, hunting with hounds. Boar, pigs etc., large prey, culling, hunting large feral animals.

Re: Minimum caliber ?

Post by bladeracer » 23 Jun 2018, 1:58 pm

bigpete wrote:Stop being obtuse. We all know exactky what they mean


How am I being obtuse? Anybody that knows even the basics about cartridges understands what a capital R refers to.
Will that stand up in court though when some wanker charges you over it?
Practice Strict Gun Control - Precision Counts!
User avatar
bladeracer
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 12678
Victoria

Re: Minimum caliber ?

Post by bigpete » 23 Jun 2018, 2:28 pm

Anyone who knows that the R stands for rimmed will also understand that its a guideline for minimum calibres and that 222 rimmed and 222 are virtually identical in power.
Anyway,last f***ing time I try to help people out here.
bigpete
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3622
South Australia

Re: Minimum caliber ?

Post by bladeracer » 23 Jun 2018, 2:41 pm

bigpete wrote:Anyone who knows that the R stands for rimmed will also understand that its a guideline for minimum calibres and that 222 rimmed and 222 are virtually identical in power.
Anyway,last f***ing time I try to help people out here.


I know the cartridges are identical in performance, but that's not relevant.
Why does my pointing out an error in a document that you have nothing to do with affect your willingness to continue helping people?
Practice Strict Gun Control - Precision Counts!
User avatar
bladeracer
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 12678
Victoria

Re: Minimum caliber ?

Post by Stix » 23 Jun 2018, 5:49 pm

I suspect those abbreviations (R, H etc.) maybe a flow on from times when it was called the "222 Remington"...
And the 17 R is prob 17 Rem as well.
The ".22H" probably indicates 'hornet' as min...

As is suggested by the document (& Pete's mentioned) its min cal/cartridge...& i cant see that someone legally culling roos or wallabies will get "confused" from 'not understanding the requirements' & therefor charged, especially given the knowledge required for paperwork submitted for approval to cull.

There are holes through all kinds of firearms related regs...arent we used to that...?

If i were culling deer for dewnr (sa govt) i cant shoot a donkey with my 7-08 as min is 30 cal...but do you rekon if i was with a park ranger on a goat cull & a feral donkey stood 100 yds in front of us he'd grab his digital calipers out & tell me not to shoot it cos im missing half a millimetre...?
More likely he/she'd have me booked for NOT toppling it over...!!

And if someone is stupid enough to go culling Roos with a 17 hornet after submitting paperwork they deserve to get caught booked...!
The man who knows everything, doesnt really know everything...he's just stopped learning...
Stix
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3675
South Australia

Re: Minimum caliber ?

Post by bladeracer » 23 Jun 2018, 6:06 pm

Stix wrote:If i were culling deer for dewnr (sa govt) i cant shoot a donkey with my 7-08 as min is 30 cal...but do you rekon if i was with a park ranger on a goat cull & a feral donkey stood 100 yds in front of us he'd grab his digital calipers out & tell me not to shoot it cos im missing half a millimetre...?
More likely he/she'd have me booked for NOT toppling it over...!!


I'm quite sure the shooter knows what he's using, the problem comes when some little Hitler ranger tries to enforce such a rule by the book.
Practice Strict Gun Control - Precision Counts!
User avatar
bladeracer
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 12678
Victoria

Re: Minimum caliber ?

Post by bigfellascott » 23 Jun 2018, 7:51 pm

bladeracer wrote:
bigfellascott wrote:
bladeracer wrote:Sure, but in a legal document, you want to be exact or people end up in court fighting ridiculous charges.
.222R refers to .222 Rimmed, always has done.


I always thought the R referred to the fact it was a Remington Cartridge design, like the 204R is for Ruger :unknown:


Nope, a capital R indicates a rimmed cartridge, just like 7.62x54R, .222R, etc. I don't think ".204R" is an official designation, just somebody's abbreviation.


Cheers mate, we live and learn. :thumbsup:
User avatar
bigfellascott
Lieutenant General
Lieutenant General
 
Posts: 5289
-

Re: Minimum caliber ?

Post by SCJ429 » 24 Jun 2018, 8:54 pm

I always thought that .224 was 5.56mm, they say 5.69?
You obviously cannot shoot them with a 22 Hornet unless you use a .224 projectile.
Why not say "e.g. 222 etc..." Does it also means that the only 204 you can use is a 204 Ruger, wildcats are not allowed?
SCJ429
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 3212
New South Wales

Re: Minimum caliber ?

Post by bladeracer » 25 Jun 2018, 8:22 am

SCJ429 wrote:I always thought that .224 was 5.56mm, they say 5.69?
You obviously cannot shoot them with a 22 Hornet unless you use a .224 projectile.
Why not say "e.g. 222 etc..." Does it also means that the only 204 you can use is a 204 Ruger, wildcats are not allowed?


Nice to see somebody else understands the importance of getting this stuff right when writing laws :-)
Practice Strict Gun Control - Precision Counts!
User avatar
bladeracer
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 12678
Victoria

Re: Minimum caliber ?

Post by bladeracer » 25 Jun 2018, 8:23 am

bigfellascott wrote:Cheers mate, we live and learn. :thumbsup:


No point in livin' if you ain't a'learnin' :-)
Practice Strict Gun Control - Precision Counts!
User avatar
bladeracer
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 12678
Victoria

Re: Minimum caliber ?

Post by Midwestman » 25 Jul 2018, 8:17 pm

if in NSW you NEED TAGS too shoot roo's even on your OWN LAND,thou it has been lifted in drought affected areas for humane reasons,there are way too many,but if you get caught with one in back off the ute for dog food you could still be in trouble.
carl gustov 03 mauser 6.5x55
savage 223
Midwestman
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 29
New South Wales

Re: Minimum caliber ?

Post by Die Judicii » 25 Jul 2018, 9:17 pm

:lol:
Speaking of "holes" in legal documents,,,,,,,,,,,,

Check this pic out.

A classic F@CK UP by the SA Police.

Three months (yes, 3 months) AFTER a family tragedy occurred, the local copper from where I used to live, was instructed from his hierarchy to come and take my firearms.

When I asked why,,,,,,,,,,, he apologized, and said to me that after what had happened there were fears that I might "top" myself.

I just laughed and said Your pretty slow off the mark, and besides, if I was gonna do that,,,, I would have done it 3 months ago.

But he still had his orders to take the firearms, which he did.

After this monumental stuff up was sorted out a week later, and when I went to collect them, these are the stickers that were attached to each f/arm.

"FIREARM (IMITATION)" :wtf: :wtf: :shock: :shock: :crazy: :crazy: Not to forget the "BOLD ACTION" :lol: :lol:

To add insult to injury, some of my firearms were also damaged.
100_4808.JPG
100_4808.JPG (525.51 KiB) Viewed 6031 times
I do not fear death itself... Only its inopportune timing!
I've come to realize that,,,,, the two most loving, loyal, and trustworthy females in my entire life were both canines.
User avatar
Die Judicii
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3719
Queensland

Re: Minimum caliber ?

Post by straightshooter » 26 Jul 2018, 7:25 am

Midwestman wrote:if in NSW you NEED TAGS too shoot roo's even on your OWN LAND,thou it has been lifted in drought affected areas for humane reasons,there are way too many,but if you get caught with one in back off the ute for dog food you could still be in trouble.


I have been thinking about forming a group to pressure the state government into paying agistment fees for harbouring THEIR kangaroos.
They happily splash money around to just about everyone else.
"Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about."
"There is no expedient to which a man will not resort to avoid the real labor of thinking." Sir Joshua Reynolds
straightshooter
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1270
New South Wales

Re: Minimum caliber ?

Post by straightshooter » 26 Jul 2018, 7:56 am

Die Judicii wrote::lol:
Speaking of "holes" in legal documents,,,,,,,,,,,,

Check this pic out.

A classic F@CK UP by the SA Police.

Three months (yes, 3 months) AFTER a family tragedy occurred, the local copper from where I used to live, was instructed from his hierarchy to come and take my firearms.

When I asked why,,,,,,,,,,, he apologized, and said to me that after what had happened there were fears that I might "top" myself.

I just laughed and said Your pretty slow off the mark, and besides, if I was gonna do that,,,, I would have done it 3 months ago.

But he still had his orders to take the firearms, which he did.

After this monumental stuff up was sorted out a week later, and when I went to collect them, these are the stickers that were attached to each f/arm.

"FIREARM (IMITATION)" :wtf: :wtf: :shock: :shock: :crazy: :crazy: Not to forget the "BOLD ACTION" :lol: :lol:

To add insult to injury, some of my firearms were also damaged.


Cast your mind back. Did you or anyone close to you visit a doctor and complain of depression or even hint at suicidal ideation?
Your doctor is then compelled to report the matter and the wheels of bureaucracy start turning.
You can't blame the doctor, he probably would like to keep practicing and enjoying an income and at the most human level he would not want to be responsible for not preventing a potential tragedy.
You must be very careful what you say to any health professional regarding feelings of depression or related symptoms such as a need for long term pain management.
It is very beneficial to have a long term, very friendly relationship with your doctor.
In the course of my employment I have been present at a group medical practice where a doctor in the middle of a consultation has come out and quietly asked the receptionist to "ring the police, xxxxxxx is suffering from ED, they need to take away his guns".
"Anything is possible if you don't know what you are talking about."
"There is no expedient to which a man will not resort to avoid the real labor of thinking." Sir Joshua Reynolds
straightshooter
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1270
New South Wales

Re: Minimum caliber ?

Post by Sergeant Hartman » 26 Jul 2018, 8:20 am

have been thinking about forming a group to pressure the state government into paying agistment fees for harbouring THEIR kangaroos.
They happily splash money around to just about everyone else.


If there are enough votes in it and I'd you are in a marginal seat

ED


why would the doctor need to take away your guns if you have erectile dysfunction.... sorry bad joke
Sergeant Hartman
Sergeant Major
Sergeant Major
 
Posts: 1722
Victoria

Re: Minimum caliber ?

Post by bigfellascott » 26 Jul 2018, 9:21 am

albat wrote:never heard of a '0' grain projectile in .224 must be the new go to projectile!


It's the diet lite version :lol:
User avatar
bigfellascott
Lieutenant General
Lieutenant General
 
Posts: 5289
-

Re: Minimum caliber ?

Post by Die Judicii » 26 Jul 2018, 9:59 am

straightshooter wrote:
Cast your mind back. Did you or anyone close to you visit a doctor and complain of depression or even hint at suicidal ideation?


NO Mate,,,,
As a matter of fact my Doctor at the time was also an ex work colleague and we had known each other for more than 20 years.
Added to the fact that she was away on leave when all the sh!t happened,, and it was her intervention (when she found out what had happened) that got all my firearms returned to me.

She was absolutely furious over what had taken place,,, believe me,, I was present when she made the phone calls to have them returned. :thumbsup:
I do not fear death itself... Only its inopportune timing!
I've come to realize that,,,,, the two most loving, loyal, and trustworthy females in my entire life were both canines.
User avatar
Die Judicii
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3719
Queensland

Re: Minimum caliber ?

Post by bigfellascott » 26 Jul 2018, 3:24 pm

What the hell is a "BOLD" Action rifle FFS? Talk about no FID of what he hell they are on about half the bloody time. Why the hell didn't they remove the car keys, rope, knives, medication, ban you from going near cliffs or train lines or roads, dams with bessar blocks etc etc etc, another example of how f***ed up this idiotic country has become.

Poor young fella last week killed himself using the XPT - have they no idea if ones intending to kill themselves that's exactly what will happen regardless of their stupid idiotic, ideology-driven thinking is?
User avatar
bigfellascott
Lieutenant General
Lieutenant General
 
Posts: 5289
-

Re: Minimum caliber ?

Post by Die Judicii » 27 Jul 2018, 10:07 am

bigfellascott wrote:What the hell is a "BOLD" Action rifle FFS?

Poor young fella last week killed himself using the XPT - have they no idea if ones intending to kill themselves that's exactly what will happen regardless of their stupid idiotic, ideology-driven thinking is?


When you can tell us all what a "BOLD" Action rifle is,,,,, we will ALL be enlightened Mate.

Furthermore, the day I went in to pick up my rifles, the police woman on duty brought them in from their armoury stacked in a Woolworths shopping trolley.
When I saw the stickers, I asked her "If they really were IMITATION firearms like the sticker says, why did they have to be locked away ?"

She just gave me a blank stare,,,, I don't think she understood what I was getting at. :roll:
I do not fear death itself... Only its inopportune timing!
I've come to realize that,,,,, the two most loving, loyal, and trustworthy females in my entire life were both canines.
User avatar
Die Judicii
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3719
Queensland

Re: Minimum caliber ?

Post by bigfellascott » 27 Jul 2018, 7:21 pm

Die Judicii wrote:
bigfellascott wrote:What the hell is a "BOLD" Action rifle FFS?

Poor young fella last week killed himself using the XPT - have they no idea if ones intending to kill themselves that's exactly what will happen regardless of their stupid idiotic, ideology-driven thinking is?


When you can tell us all what a "BOLD" Action rifle is,,,,, we will ALL be enlightened Mate.

Furthermore, the day I went in to pick up my rifles, the police woman on duty brought them in from their armoury stacked in a Woolworths shopping trolley.
When I saw the stickers, I asked her "If they really were IMITATION firearms like the sticker says, why did they have to be locked away ?"

She just gave me a blank stare,,,, I don't think she understood what I was getting at. :roll:


They are clueless no doubt about it, I remember seeing some sort of police hierarchy woffling on about about a bolt action rifle that he described as a semi auto from memory, completely clueless about the subject yet spoke like was the authority on it. :thumbsdown:
User avatar
bigfellascott
Lieutenant General
Lieutenant General
 
Posts: 5289
-

Next

Back to top
 
Return to Hunting - Game hunting and large prey