Fionn wrote:
As I said before, I am here for entertainment, I love watching people making a fool of themselves and then doubling down on it.
Fionn wrote:
As I said before, I am here for entertainment, I love watching people making a fool of themselves and then doubling down on it.
Oldbloke wrote:Fionn wrote:
As I said before, I am here for entertainment, I love watching people making a fool of themselves and then doubling down on it.
Fionn wrote:Wasn't there some research that said most shots where under 100 yards on Sambar?
I have never shot one over this distance.
Seems a lot of people overcompensate for either lack of shooting skill or hunting skill by using overpowered calibers "just in case" they can't shoot well or are a long way away.
I have shot sambar with my 45/70, but I do so because I enjoy using it not because I think you need to use something like this as a well placed shot at a suitable range with a 7.62x39 will be more then enough.
The important thing, is a well placed shot and a suitable range .
Fionn wrote:animalpest wrote:And here is Fionn, the great master of hunting, who ignores genuine questions asked. Because you love to try to criticise people but have no answers yourself.
I ignore the question as it's not a genuine question! Anyone who is commenting on what type of firearm is suitable for Sambar stalking should know the answer otherwise it just shows they are talking out their arse.
Equally if those said people really wanted to know the answer it's not hard to find.animalpest wrote:Having never hunted Sambar but plenty of other deer species (reds, fallow and Rusa) as well as thousands of animals of the same size as Samba then I can tell you with experience that very few have that unless you have perfect head shots then a .357 magnum does not cut the mustard.
Again I will state that Fionn talks with forked tongue purely as an antagonistic wannabe with little to no personal experience.
Fairy typical response from someone with no argument, first the veiled threats and now attacking the person due to lack of an argument.
Completely expected.animalpest wrote:The only way these sorts of people work is to not answer questions that may expose their lack of actual experiences but try (unsuccessfully) to make personal attacks on people.
That my friends, is the classic traits of a delusional wannabe which I have doubts has ever hunted.
The answer is pretty easy for anyone that's stalked Sambar, the only people seem to have issues knowing the answer are people who have never stalked Sambar and aren't smart enough to find out the answer themselves with being spoon fed the answer.
It's amusing to watch the little hissy fits they are throwing because they don't know.
wrenchman wrote:not to throw sand any but my this post has gone off track
Oldbloke wrote:Fionn wrote:Wasn't there some research that said most shots where under 100 yards on Sambar?
I have never shot one over this distance.
Seems a lot of people overcompensate for either lack of shooting skill or hunting skill by using overpowered calibers "just in case" they can't shoot well or are a long way away.
I have shot sambar with my 45/70, but I do so because I enjoy using it not because I think you need to use something like this as a well placed shot at a suitable range with a 7.62x39 will be more then enough.
The important thing, is a well placed shot and a suitable range .
AP. Never argue with an xspert. Owns a 4570, but plans to use a 357.
bigrich wrote:Fionn wrote:animalpest wrote:And here is Fionn, the great master of hunting, who ignores genuine questions asked. Because you love to try to criticise people but have no answers yourself.
I ignore the question as it's not a genuine question! Anyone who is commenting on what type of firearm is suitable for Sambar stalking should know the answer otherwise it just shows they are talking out their arse.
Equally if those said people really wanted to know the answer it's not hard to find.animalpest wrote:Having never hunted Sambar but plenty of other deer species (reds, fallow and Rusa) as well as thousands of animals of the same size as Samba then I can tell you with experience that very few have that unless you have perfect head shots then a .357 magnum does not cut the mustard.
Again I will state that Fionn talks with forked tongue purely as an antagonistic wannabe with little to no personal experience.
Fairy typical response from someone with no argument, first the veiled threats and now attacking the person due to lack of an argument.
Completely expected.animalpest wrote:The only way these sorts of people work is to not answer questions that may expose their lack of actual experiences but try (unsuccessfully) to make personal attacks on people.
That my friends, is the classic traits of a delusional wannabe which I have doubts has ever hunted.
The answer is pretty easy for anyone that's stalked Sambar, the only people seem to have issues knowing the answer are people who have never stalked Sambar and aren't smart enough to find out the answer themselves with being spoon fed the answer.
It's amusing to watch the little hissy fits they are throwing because they don't know.
ahh fionn. your back . still taking the "high minded" disdain for us lesser folks who aren't the great font of knowledge and experience, like yourself
you still haven't answered my question . you avoided it , then disappeared for a while . now your back , and fresh with new vigour , to stir and belittle people on this forum who obviously have more knowledge and experience than you . you must wear a tri-corner hat with bells , cause your obviously a fool
have a great day
bigrich wrote:your too much fionn refusing to answer cause it's beneath you to do so when all i wanted was to learn from fionn , the great sage , and font of all knowledge . the great fionn , who uncle nick comes to for advice
i'm heart broken that you couldn't respond to impart your wisdom to me . i know how busy you are attending medieval fairs , wearing your jester/village idiot costume teasing folks for your own cheap laughs
bigrich wrote:your too much fionn refusing to answer cause it's beneath you to do so when all i wanted was to learn from fionn , the great sage , and font of all knowledge . the great fionn , who uncle nick comes to for advice
i'm heart broken that you couldn't respond to impart your wisdom to me . i know how busy you are attending medieval fairs , wearing your jester/village idiot costume teasing folks for your own cheap laughs
Fionn wrote:bigrich wrote:your too much fionn refusing to answer cause it's beneath you to do so when all i wanted was to learn from fionn , the great sage , and font of all knowledge . the great fionn , who uncle nick comes to for advice
i'm heart broken that you couldn't respond to impart your wisdom to me . i know how busy you are attending medieval fairs , wearing your jester/village idiot costume teasing folks for your own cheap laughs
Just chalk it up to one of the many disappointments you experience in life which you don't understand.
Fionn wrote:bigrich wrote:Fionn wrote:animalpest wrote:And here is Fionn, the great master of hunting, who ignores genuine questions asked. Because you love to try to criticise people but have no answers yourself.
I ignore the question as it's not a genuine question! Anyone who is commenting on what type of firearm is suitable for Sambar stalking should know the answer otherwise it just shows they are talking out their arse.
Equally if those said people really wanted to know the answer it's not hard to find.animalpest wrote:Having never hunted Sambar but plenty of other deer species (reds, fallow and Rusa) as well as thousands of animals of the same size as Samba then I can tell you with experience that very few have that unless you have perfect head shots then a .357 magnum does not cut the mustard.
Again I will state that Fionn talks with forked tongue purely as an antagonistic wannabe with little to no personal experience.
Fairy typical response from someone with no argument, first the veiled threats and now attacking the person due to lack of an argument.
Completely expected.animalpest wrote:The only way these sorts of people work is to not answer questions that may expose their lack of actual experiences but try (unsuccessfully) to make personal attacks on people.
That my friends, is the classic traits of a delusional wannabe which I have doubts has ever hunted.
The answer is pretty easy for anyone that's stalked Sambar, the only people seem to have issues knowing the answer are people who have never stalked Sambar and aren't smart enough to find out the answer themselves with being spoon fed the answer.
It's amusing to watch the little hissy fits they are throwing because they don't know.
ahh fionn. your back . still taking the "high minded" disdain for us lesser folks who aren't the great font of knowledge and experience, like yourself
you still haven't answered my question . you avoided it , then disappeared for a while . now your back , and fresh with new vigour , to stir and belittle people on this forum who obviously have more knowledge and experience than you . you must wear a tri-corner hat with bells , cause your obviously a fool
have a great day
I am generally busy over Easter with work, but I did tell you why I didn't answer your question.
But the disdain is real.
Oldbloke wrote:
Ummm I don't think you understand.
YOU ARE THE JOKE.
animalpest wrote:
I was busy with work over Easter too. But that doesn't stop me from from answering questions from members.
My distain is only matched by my incredulous involvement in assisting to find a submachine gun dropped and hidden by a nice person running away. My work can be so entertaining
Would that be better than a 7.62x39 for Sambar?
Blr243 wrote:This reminds me of a snowball fight i had with a bunch of good friends at perisher ski resort 30 years ago . It was me agaist everyone else. I can remember it as clear as day . I never had so much fun in all my life even though i was probably getting smashed
animalpest wrote:Not really. Just that some people's work can be more involved and complex than people can imagine. Just like people's experiences.
9mm, 30 plus round magazine capacity.
Fionn wrote:Oldbloke wrote:
Ummm I don't think you understand.
YOU ARE THE JOKE.
animalpest wrote:Fionn you missed my point. You attack and criticise people with sarcasm and try to take a higher intellectual stand. And you assume too much of people's knowledge and experiences.
Yes, it was "exciting" for ALL involved. And it could have very nearly ended with tragic consequences for me and others given the baddies were looking for the gun hidden in the grass when we were there.
And that is the point of posting about it. Don't assume people know nothing or have limited experiences. And please cut the sarcasm, it's not needed or warranted.
animalpest wrote:Fionn you missed my point. You attack and criticise people with sarcasm and try to take a higher intellectual stand. And you assume too much of people's knowledge and experiences.
Yes, it was "exciting" for ALL involved. And it could have very nearly ended with tragic consequences for me and others given the baddies were looking for the gun hidden in the grass when we were there.
And that is the point of posting about it. Don't assume people know nothing or have limited experiences. And please cut the sarcasm, it's not needed or warranted.
bigrich wrote:animalpest wrote:Fionn you missed my point. You attack and criticise people with sarcasm and try to take a higher intellectual stand. And you assume too much of people's knowledge and experiences.
Yes, it was "exciting" for ALL involved. And it could have very nearly ended with tragic consequences for me and others given the baddies were looking for the gun hidden in the grass when we were there.
And that is the point of posting about it. Don't assume people know nothing or have limited experiences. And please cut the sarcasm, it's not needed or warranted.
i agree with your assessment AP . but fionn seems to get off on all the drama and attention he (or she? ) gets . by the same token of fionn's posts, i could say i'm a neuclear scientist who's also published several papers on the subject , but i won't bother explaining to the lesser mortals on this forum .
i think fionn is a narcissist who over rates his knowledge and intellectual abilities on a online forum , and gets derogatory when called out over his (or her) lack of real experience or knowledge . why , because he (or she) can . there's no accountability on a online forum .
E=MC/2 , einstein's relativity theory . fionn i'd explain the rest , but a simpleton like you just wouldn't understand
Fionn wrote:animalpest wrote:Fionn you missed my point. You attack and criticise people with sarcasm and try to take a higher intellectual stand. And you assume too much of people's knowledge and experiences.
Yes, it was "exciting" for ALL involved. And it could have very nearly ended with tragic consequences for me and others given the baddies were looking for the gun hidden in the grass when we were there.
And that is the point of posting about it. Don't assume people know nothing or have limited experiences. And please cut the sarcasm, it's not needed or warranted.
You seriously think I missed you point? I know your point, it's just that its rather badly thought out and pointless.
Just because something is incredulous and out of the ordinary for you doesn't mean it's not mundane and simple for others.
Instead of veiled threats and personal attacks like you engage in, I think I will stick with intellect and sarcasm.
Oldbloke wrote:Fionn wrote:
As I said before, I am here for entertainment, I love watching people making a fool of themselves and then doubling down on it.
Oldbloke wrote:Oldbloke wrote:Fionn wrote:
As I said before, I am here for entertainment, I love watching people making a fool of themselves and then doubling down on it.
Don't interact with this pidgeon. The more he posts the more pidgeon sh1t he drops in the forum. By his own admission is only here for his entertainment.
Certainly not to provide any useful information or intelligent conversation.