headspace wrote:My point in that post was not to say 500m shots are not possible, but in hunting there are a lot of variables, which increase along with distance. I don't want my recreation threatened by someone from the newly militant RCPCA finding a wounded animal and accusing all hunters of being careless mongrels. The ethic is clear; clean cleanly and if you make a balls of it follow up the animal. When ranges get out past 200m it gets a lot harder to do any of those things. If people want to see how far the rifle will shoot , oil drums and paper don't bleed. Let's say you do have a clear shot a 500m but as you squeeze the trigger the animal moves or the wind shifts, that can mean the difference between a clean kill and a gut shot. Think about it, Hunting fur is a lot different to hitting a target. The targets don't move.
JD
I think my post came out the wrong way I was trying to point out that even though you can hit a target at that range the groups aren't tight enough to safely shoot a deer sized target.
But saying that in a situation of hitting a rabbit at that range with a .308 or simmilar size provided that they sit nice and still and you manage to hit one any where in the centre of mass will be a humane kill.