Title_II wrote:They really need to stop naming places after the "F" word. Remember when the tsunami hit Fuk-it, Thailand?
Fuk-U-Shima. What where they thinking?
Title_II wrote:They really need to stop naming places after the "F" word. Remember when the tsunami hit Fuk-it, Thailand?
Fuk-U-Shima. What where they thinking?
on_one_wheel wrote:Apparently there's no shortage of radioactive migratory fish in the sea also. I've read that radiation levels in tuna tripled after Fukushima.
on_one_wheel wrote:Apparently there's no shortage of radioactive migratory fish in the sea also. I've read that radiation levels in tuna tripled after Fukushima.
Title_II wrote:They really need to stop naming places after the "F" word. Remember when the tsunami hit Fuk-it, Thailand?
Fuk-U-Shima. What where they thinking?
Die Judicii wrote:Title_II wrote:They really need to stop naming places after the "F" word. Remember when the tsunami hit Fuk-it, Thailand?
Fuk-U-Shima. What where they thinking?
Yeah I get the joke,,,,
Pity it is actually spelt Phuket tho,,,,,,,,,,
wimpb wrote:Radiation levels are usually overblown in the media. 3 times the level of radiation compared to background radiation is almost nothing since background radiation levels is not much to begin with. It's like saying I tripled the amount of peanuts I'm eating when I was only eating one to start with.