At last, an answer to Roo numbers.

Game hunting and large prey. Deer stalking, hunting with hounds. Boar, pigs etc., large prey, culling, hunting large feral animals.

Re: At last, an answer to Roo numbers.

Post by tom604 » 10 Jun 2016, 6:49 pm

I'm no greenie and no conservationist and have no problem with bucks/does/joeys or whatever being targeted and dispatched, but p1ss poor markmanship is another matter. The fact that not one was head shot shows the shooter didn't have the confidence to do the job properly, hence the body shots.[/quote]

so if you are culling, you still have to shoot them in the head? i know if they are for the chillers you head shoot them (no meat damage) but culling is just about putting them down, is there a reg in place for that for culls? :thumbsup:
User avatar
tom604
Warrant Officer C2
Warrant Officer C2
 
Posts: 1053
South Australia

Re: At last, an answer to Roo numbers.

Post by Die Judicii » 13 Jun 2016, 8:40 pm

tom604 wrote:
so if you are culling, you still have to shoot them in the head? i know if they are for the chillers you head shoot them (no meat damage) but culling is just about putting them down, is there a reg in place for that for culls? :thumbsup:


Yes,,,,, "Head Shots"

On the cull permit I had in Sth Aus, it stated that they must be head shot.
I would envisage that all other states would be the same, but I don't have any first hand knowledge of the other states requirements.

Seems to be at odds with the aim (pardon the play on words) though.
I tend to think of culling in differing ways (my views only) because if culling sick or injured, your only taking one or two, with
head shots achievable.
If culling absolute numbers, your taking maybe 30 or 40 for example, and normally you wouldn't have a mob sitting still to allow that to happen.
In that situation, I don't imagine head shots would be achievable.
I have no idea what the law really would be.
I do not fear death itself... Only its inopportune timing!
I've come to realize that,,,,, the two most loving, loyal, and trustworthy females in my entire life were both canines.
User avatar
Die Judicii
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3727
Queensland

Re: At last, an answer to Roo numbers.

Post by Arth » 14 Jun 2016, 10:47 am

Seems pretty arbitrary?

Depends on what cartridge you're culling with but I'm sure plenty of guys are using their trusty .308 as their do it all.

Like a .30 cal through the chest doesn't put a roo down quick-smart?
User avatar
Arth
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 174
Victoria

Re: At last, an answer to Roo numbers.

Post by Gwion » 14 Jun 2016, 11:03 am

It's not about putting the animal down; it's about killing it in the shortest possible time, ie: instantly. The only way to instantly kill anything it to cause catastrophic damage to the central nervous system. The only reliable way to do that is to take out the brain with an accurate head shot.

With a 'vitals' shot, even though they may drop and not move and will bleed out very quickly; it is still not strictly an 'instant' kill.

This is the reasoning behind the government guidelines/rules requiring head shots. For meat harvest, it also is about minimising spoilage of product (damage meat) and chance of contamination for human consumption.
User avatar
Gwion
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3978
-

Re: At last, an answer to Roo numbers.

Post by Elek » 14 Jun 2016, 11:53 am

I suspect Arths comment about headshots being an arbitrary requirement is why is it fine (even recommended) to do chest shots when controlling vermin or "hunting" game, but not for "culling".

I don't have any experience in this but I'm sure we've all seen the aerial culling of pigs. No regular headshots happening there.

The government still make the guidelines/rules for hunting deer but there is no such requirement.
Remington 700 SPS Tactical in .308 Win
Remington 700 XCR Tactical Long Range in .223 Rem
Bushnell Elite Tactical ERS 4.5-30x 50mm
User avatar
Elek
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 141
Western Australia

Re: At last, an answer to Roo numbers.

Post by adam » 14 Jun 2016, 12:09 pm

So why the discrimination then from the government?

Why are Kangaroo's any different to Pigs, Foxes, Rabbits, rats, mice, etc that it must be headshots but the others can be baited, dying a slower death by poison, by traps, or by torso shots, etc?

I understand the quick and humane death thing (I prefer quick kills myself when hunting)... but it seems a little impractical for farmers, not to mention illogical and more emotional based.
adam
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 319
Victoria

Re: At last, an answer to Roo numbers.

Post by tom604 » 14 Jun 2016, 1:15 pm

Elek wrote:I suspect Arths comment about headshots being an arbitrary requirement is why is it fine (even recommended) to do chest shots when controlling vermin or "hunting" game, but not for "culling".

I don't have any experience in this but I'm sure we've all seen the aerial culling of pigs. No regular headshots happening there.

The government still make the guidelines/rules for hunting deer but there is no such requirement.



this is why i asked ^^ and if im on a goat cull its not a head shot only cull ,,maybe its because its a roo :unknown: you would think that center of mass would be better than a head shot in a cull situation ,,get more on the ground faster/easier . i know they do chopper culls for deer in the south east and i would bet my last dollar that head shots are not the norm. talking culls not chiller :thumbsup:
User avatar
tom604
Warrant Officer C2
Warrant Officer C2
 
Posts: 1053
South Australia

Re: At last, an answer to Roo numbers.

Post by Gwion » 14 Jun 2016, 1:36 pm

Dunno... may come down to the fact that 'roos are on the national coat of arms... In Tas they recommend either head or chest shots when culling wallaby but they are much smaller and less robust than eastern greys or reds.
User avatar
Gwion
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3978
-

Re: At last, an answer to Roo numbers.

Post by on_one_wheel » 07 Jul 2016, 9:15 pm

I've recently been given a permit to destroy roos in SA.
A estimation of roo numbers was given to DEWNR by the agronomist. He estimated 500 - 600 Western Grey Kangaroos (a very conservative estimation)
The permit was granted for 75 roos from the 150 applied for.
The permit was emailed along with a 20 page code of conduct fir shooting kangaroos and wallabies for non comercial purposes.
.
Point of aim
(i) A shooter using a rifle must aim so as to hit the target kangaroo or wallaby in the brain (see Schedule 2).
(ii) A shooter using a shotgun must aim so that, whether the target kangaroo or wallaby is stationary or mobile, it will be hit in the head or chest by the centre of the shot pattern.
(iii) A shooter must not aim so as to hit the target kangaroo or wallaby in any other part of the body than those specified in (i) and (ii) above.
Follow-up
(i) The shooter must be certain that each kangaroo or wallaby is dead before another is targeted.
(ii) If a kangaroo or wallaby is still alive after being shot, every reasonable effort must be made immediately to locate and kill it before any attempt is made to shoot another animal. The injured kangaroo or wallaby must be euthanased in accordance with the methods outlined in Section 4.

Copy of the code below
https://www.google.com.au/url?sa=t&sour ... xuWXR4bHdA

The point they make elsewhere in the code of conduct is " to cause instantaneous death"
Gun control requires concentration and a steady hand
User avatar
on_one_wheel
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3596
South Australia

Re: At last, an answer to Roo numbers.

Post by scaredyet » 08 Jul 2016, 7:51 am

Do you pay for a permit
scaredyet
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 136
New South Wales

Re: At last, an answer to Roo numbers.

Post by on_one_wheel » 08 Jul 2016, 10:52 am

I'll ask the wife when I see her next, she organized it. Im pretty sure there was no payment made to DEWNR.
Gun control requires concentration and a steady hand
User avatar
on_one_wheel
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3596
South Australia

Re: At last, an answer to Roo numbers.

Post by tom604 » 08 Jul 2016, 12:17 pm

thanks for the follow up :thumbsup: may have to do my roo accreditation, just in case :thumbsup:
User avatar
tom604
Warrant Officer C2
Warrant Officer C2
 
Posts: 1053
South Australia

Re: At last, an answer to Roo numbers.

Post by Baronvonrort » 08 Jul 2016, 12:44 pm

scaredyet wrote:Do you pay for a permit


Does the government give anything away for free, have porcine animals become aerodynamic?
Baronvonrort
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
 
Posts: 906
New South Wales

Re: At last, an answer to Roo numbers.

Post by on_one_wheel » 08 Jul 2016, 4:26 pm

tom604 wrote:thanks for the follow up :thumbsup: may have to do my roo accreditation, just in case :thumbsup:


The oy accreditation you need in SA is your current FA license.
Gun control requires concentration and a steady hand
User avatar
on_one_wheel
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3596
South Australia

Re: At last, an answer to Roo numbers.

Post by GCCA » 24 Jul 2016, 12:04 pm

The reason some (not all some) chillers only want bucks is because they sell the hides and the pouch on the does messes with the available leather. 99% of commercially manufactured goods using roo leather is from a buck.

In Vic if you are shooting roos for the chillers they have to be head shot, if you injure a roo and it is not killed i.e jaw shot then you are allowed to follow up with a chest shot, but if you continually turn up to the chillers with chest shot roos you will lose your accreditation.
GCCA
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 12
Victoria

Re: At last, an answer to Roo numbers.

Post by on_one_wheel » 24 Jul 2016, 1:05 pm

scaredyet wrote:Do you pay for a permit


No fee for the permit for destruction in sa, they must generate revenue from the professionals, the processing license isn't cheep.
Gun control requires concentration and a steady hand
User avatar
on_one_wheel
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3596
South Australia

Previous

Back to top
 
Return to Hunting - Game hunting and large prey