BRNOmod2 wrote:Being that the Omark was designed solely for Fullbore shooting and im a long time fullbore shooter I would choose an Omark over all others you listed
Jack V wrote:BRNOmod2 wrote:Being that the Omark was designed solely for Fullbore shooting and im a long time fullbore shooter I would choose an Omark over all others you listed
An old Omark over a Tikka ?
Jack V wrote:BRNOmod2 wrote:Being that the Omark was designed solely for Fullbore shooting and im a long time fullbore shooter I would choose an Omark over all others you listed
An old Omark over a Tikka ?
Chronos wrote:a $300 Omark with a new 28-30" match grade barrel and adapter would outshoot a new tikka with a factory barrel every day of the week and would cost the same or less
I'm a fan of my tikkas but let's be realistic. Now if you compare it to lets say a new savage 12 in f class guise then it would be a close call but the savage would cost double
Jack V wrote:And if something breaks on an Omark it's much harder to find parts than a Tikka and now it's about the same price before it was half the price .
Since when is full bore shooting exactly the same as long range shooting . It could be long range game shooting ?
How many cartridges are Omarks chambered in or could even be chambered in ? The adapter or barrel tenon gets thin when chambering bigger than 308W .
We hear about these fantastic shooting Omarks but I am yet to see one that is any more accurate than a Sako or Tikka on average .
If they were so fantastic you would not be able to buy one for 300 bucks.
Morro wrote:Jack V
I've noticed you have become somewhat a self proclaimed gunsmith expert on this forum. You have made a lot of very valid points and answered many questions but there comes a time when if you are not an expert on the subject be carefull what you say.
From when I couldnt even hold a fullbore rifle up, having to sit it on a box in the late seventies with my awesome dad to when I left fullbore prone target shooting at ANZAC rifle range in the late 1990's, I used and still own Omark model A's and B's. I competed in the annual Queens shoot and intra state comps ,doing quite well as an A grade shooter. The Omark as stated by Chronos is a very accurate firearm. I think you might find either last year or year before an Aussie took out the prestigious Bisley shoot in England with his dads s**ty old Omark. Omark didnt have the market on barrels, all mine have Black Mountain hammer forged barrels except 2 Model A's that have the chrome lined. Shillen, Madco, black Mountain made barrels for them with no adapter, I think tobler required it. Yes the adapter added strength to the simple design but didnt add centre bulls when it counted.
My rifles are basically 30 years old and have never required any spare parts after getting the bolt safety mods to the model A's to update them to the improved model B's.
I hope you get to shoot one of these one day, yes they are plain and basic but also having a fitter/machinist background, I really appreciate economy and strength of design to achieve the desired task. I came from a rather poor family and drooled over the Angel and Musgrave's the rich guys had with their new high tech stainless fluted barrels but the Omark always punched above its weight
Chronos wrote:A mate bought an Omark a while back, even with its original barrel it's a genuine 1/2moa rifle. Cost him $300 with rings, no sights.
Chronos wrote:i guess the op will need to specify what kind of long range shooting he is talking about, until then i stand by my comments that for "long range" shooting an omark is a fantastic starting point, capable of shooting very accurately and even factoring in a new barrel less than 1/2 the price of an equivalent new rifle.
gherx wrote:Chronos wrote:i guess the op will need to specify what kind of long range shooting he is talking about, until then i stand by my comments that for "long range" shooting an omark is a fantastic starting point, capable of shooting very accurately and even factoring in a new barrel less than 1/2 the price of an equivalent new rifle.
This is just the research stage, but I guess lets say we're talking about F-class and the distances in that discipline so we have some sort of base for comparison.
(comparison now that the question has been answered already anyway )
bluerob wrote:I'm looking at putting an Omark into a GRS stock. I'll have to purchase the blank version and have someone do the in letting and fitting. I'm looking to use this in F-Class.
I had the privilege of watching Morro use Omark's and hit centre bulls at 1000m with peep sights many many times.
1st time I hit a centre bull, I was doing cartwheels up and down the old club house at Malabar.
Morro wrote:Jack V
I've noticed you have become somewhat a self proclaimed gunsmith expert on this forum. You have made a lot of very valid points and answered many questions but there comes a time when if you are not an expert on the subject be carefull what you say.
From when I couldnt even hold a fullbore rifle up, having to sit it on a box in the late seventies with my awesome dad to when I left fullbore prone target shooting at ANZAC rifle range in the late 1990's, I used and still own Omark model A's and B's. I competed in the annual Queens shoot and intra state comps ,doing quite well as an A grade shooter. The Omark as stated by Chronos is a very accurate firearm. I think you might find either last year or year before an Aussie took out the prestigious Bisley shoot in England with his dads s**ty old Omark. Omark didnt have the market on barrels, all mine have Black Mountain hammer forged barrels except 2 Model A's that have the chrome lined. Shillen, Madco, black Mountain made barrels for them with no adapter, I think tobler required it. Yes the adapter added strength to the simple design but didnt add centre bulls when it counted.
My rifles are basically 30 years old and have never required any spare parts after getting the bolt safety mods to the model A's to update them to the improved model B's.
I hope you get to shoot one of these one day, yes they are plain and basic but also having a fitter/machinist background, I really appreciate economy and strength of design to achieve the desired task. I came from a rather poor family and drooled over the Angel and Musgrave's the rich guys had with their new high tech stainless fluted barrels but the Omark always punched above its weight
Jack V wrote:Morro wrote:Jack V
I did not say they were not accurate I said that I don't think they are the best thing for a new project and don't threaten me sport .
NO ONE SAID THEY WERE NOT ACCUARTE YOU ARE IMAGINING THINGS.
Jack V wrote:You and your mate started this chronos . You are the antagonist in this , trying to shut other peoples opinions out because they don't fit your ideas. Look back at my first post I never said anything bad about your Precious Omark .
Chronos wrote:Hey mate. I can highly recommend Matt Peroz in castle hill (OLRP)
He has completed a few jobs for me now and his work is first class and he always give an accurate completion date. He is quickly becoming the goto gunsmith in Sydney for F class and BR rifle gunsmithing
Pm me for his contact details if you want
Chronos