Westy wrote:^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Sorry I just don't get the what all the fuss is over shooting 100yr old rifles that sucked the day they left the factory???? Like most British inventions they were a piece of over rated s**t right up there with the Leyland P-76,I know I'm going to hear how great they were from some of you but sorry their just a inaccurate heavy trite piece of last century s**t IMHO
the only reason we had to use this thing is our worthless Generals(mostly british hacks) had their heads right up right royal Lord Someone's Ass
We should have gone with the yanks and got rid of it and used the 30-06
Bring it!!!!!!
It was quite interesting late last year on the mound at 600, 500 and 300yards (a club day for around fifteen of us), of all the sporting rifles, tactical jobbies(including a DTA that we had all been hearing about for two years and had to put up with at 100m on a regular basis) and deer rifles you know what won the day over all three distances?
You know what came first?
My No4 Mk1(T) copy(I wasn't using it as I was too busy marking and running back and forth all day)
You know what came third?
My s**ty old 1901 LE1(shortened range pattern .303) with a central apeture sight.
If I had wanted to I could have taken a target rifle and shot 58-59's all day and blitzed everyone but that is hardly the point is it? You know you can have a DTA SRS in .308 worth thousands but if you only ever shoot at 100m and rely on trajectory tables without backing them up with practice you aren't going to score real well.
It used to be a cheap way to get into shooting but those days are long gone.
You either get the milsurp thing or you don't, and it's no skin off my nose if someone doesn't get it, there is no point in trying to convert them.
But you know what, of the seven people that had a go at 100 with my stock standard 1941 SMLE six now own ex military .303's of some form or another, it is all in the name of fun.