by in2anity » 22 Sep 2018, 7:34 pm
There's a lot more to this subject than meets the eye. I spent a lot of time chasing accuracy (with lead bullets) out of my remlin 336; ultimately I achieved around consistent 2-3moa, which I see as pretty decent for a lever gun. But it only grouped like that over a reduced load of 2207; around 17grs of 2207 from memory. But to be fair I also accurized the rifle by sanding the forend so the rear barrel-band was a tad loose (and made sure the front band was never tight). That said, I still never believed the microgroove stabilized all the lead pills perfectly; there was ALWAYS some evidence of some (slightly) non-concentric holes. Basically I think the shallow grooves don't grip the softer lead consistently, leading to inconsistent stabilization. Other factors include the hardness of the pill; for example my gun seemed to shoot a softer pill (of say around 9bhn) slightly better than a harder pill of say 18bhn (but not significantly better I might add). Other factors often glossed over (with respect to this subject) is twist - the microgroove marlins are a 1:10 twist, whereas the ballard versions are 1:12 - this might contribute to the problem, keyword being might. 1:10 twist is pretty tight for a soft lead pill. My best lead slingers are ballard cut rifling - you can just tell by looking at the targets that they stabilize the lead pills perfectly, not to mention more accurate. I have a Marlin CB (slower twist, ballard rifling, heavier barrel) and with the right recipe it's a 1.5moa shooter!
At what point does lack of maintenance become patina?