What would it take for a safety to fail

Bolt action rifles, lever action, pump action, self loading rifles and other miscellaneous longarms.

Re: What would it take for a safety to fail

Post by Dirtdart89 » 10 Feb 2014, 12:10 pm

Yeah pretty much looking for mines with our feet and such. Also the magic black sticks (mine detectors) made us pretty fancy (high value) sniper targets.
Outnumbered? More like target rich environment.
7.62mm
Dirtdart89
Private
Private
 
Posts: 57
Queensland

Re: What would it take for a safety to fail

Post by Farmjer » 10 Feb 2014, 3:01 pm

I thought they had mine clearing vehicles these days?

Like a tank with an armoured front and revolving metal flail at the front that detonates the mines ahead of the vehicle?

f*** walking through a minefield with a detector in hand :lol:
User avatar
Farmjer
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 110
South Australia

Re: What would it take for a safety to fail

Post by harlow » 10 Feb 2014, 3:14 pm

Farmjer wrote:Like a tank with an armoured front and revolving metal flail at the front that detonates the mines ahead of the vehicle?


LOL. Forget needing infantry, just roll out one of those things into the enemy trench :D
Savage 25 Lightweight Varminter .223 Rem
Savage Model 25 LVT .17HMR
User avatar
harlow
Private
Private
 
Posts: 59
New South Wales

Re: What would it take for a safety to fail

Post by Dirtdart89 » 10 Feb 2014, 5:50 pm

Yeah flails have been around since about ww2 and we do have newer vehicles with ground penetrating radar and such but the Australian army is a bunch of tight arses and we don't use them as much due to things breaking off when they explode.
Outnumbered? More like target rich environment.
7.62mm
Dirtdart89
Private
Private
 
Posts: 57
Queensland

Re: What would it take for a safety to fail

Post by beepar » 10 Feb 2014, 8:00 pm

Dirtdart89 wrote:the Australian army is a bunch of tight arses and we don't use them as much due to things breaking off when they explode.


I've got the answer...

BIGGER FLAILS! :lol:
User avatar
beepar
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 33
New South Wales

Re: What would it take for a safety to fail

Post by Dirtdart89 » 10 Feb 2014, 8:27 pm

Yeah unfortunately the Taliban are a lot smarter than we give em credit for they build the pressure plate or trigger up in front of the main explosive so when the flail or whatever hits it, the main charge will be pretty much right under the vehicle. I'm not sure if they have tried extending the flails or rollers but they would probably figure it out after a few days.
Outnumbered? More like target rich environment.
7.62mm
Dirtdart89
Private
Private
 
Posts: 57
Queensland

Re: What would it take for a safety to fail

Post by Monty » 10 Feb 2014, 8:50 pm

There's another clearer which is basically a plough if I remember right. The name escapes me, but it's a UK built one I'm pretty sure.

Probably doesn't put on the same show as the flail contraption... A bit simpler, basically a thick enough armoured front-end that it can sweep up everything in it's path detonations and all.

Any former-army Brits here?
Obligatory moderator signature: If you can't play by the rules, don't let the door hit you on the way out.
User avatar
Monty
Moderator
 
New South Wales

Re: What would it take for a safety to fail

Post by Dirtdart89 » 10 Feb 2014, 10:38 pm

I know the type, they stuck a plough on a tank either an abrahms or a leopard. I don't recall can only use those in minefields, not so much roads.
Outnumbered? More like target rich environment.
7.62mm
Dirtdart89
Private
Private
 
Posts: 57
Queensland

Re: What would it take for a safety to fail

Post by pucker » 11 Feb 2014, 2:11 pm

I think we're talking about this...

Image

Called the "Trojan Engineer Armoured Tank Vehicle".
User avatar
pucker
Private
Private
 
Posts: 62
New South Wales

Re: What would it take for a safety to fail

Post by Dirtdart89 » 11 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm

Yup that's the one.
Outnumbered? More like target rich environment.
7.62mm
Dirtdart89
Private
Private
 
Posts: 57
Queensland

Re: What would it take for a safety to fail

Post by VICHunter » 11 Feb 2014, 4:58 pm

That thing looks bad ass.

Got the excavator arm on it and everything.
User avatar
VICHunter
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 623
Victoria

Re: What would it take for a safety to fail

Post by Westy » 19 Feb 2014, 6:20 pm

Dirtdart89 wrote:Yeah unfortunately the Taliban are a lot smarter than we give em credit for they build the pressure plate or trigger up in front of the main explosive so when the flail or whatever hits it, the main charge will be pretty much right under the vehicle. I'm not sure if they have tried extending the flails or rollers but they would probably figure it out after a few days.


It took them 10 years to find a little old Grey Haired man riding a donkey there smart alright!!!! As for the safety if you have one in the tube and hope that it won't fail then I'm staying in the ute your on your own !!LOL :mrgreen: :ugeek: :mrgreen:
I've learned that pleasing everyone is impossible, but pissing everyone off is a piece of cake.
User avatar
Westy
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1276
Queensland

Re: What would it take for a safety to fail

Post by Westy » 19 Feb 2014, 6:20 pm

Dirtdart89 wrote:Yeah unfortunately the Taliban are a lot smarter than we give em credit for they build the pressure plate or trigger up in front of the main explosive so when the flail or whatever hits it, the main charge will be pretty much right under the vehicle. I'm not sure if they have tried extending the flails or rollers but they would probably figure it out after a few days.


It took them 10 years to find a little old Grey Haired man riding a donkey there smart alright!!!! As for the safety if you have one in the tube and hope that it won't fail then I'm staying in the ute your on your own !!LOL :mrgreen: :ugeek: :mrgreen:
I've learned that pleasing everyone is impossible, but pissing everyone off is a piece of cake.
User avatar
Westy
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1276
Queensland

Re: What would it take for a safety to fail

Post by Weepy » 20 Feb 2014, 8:29 am

You have to appease your guns every time you use them by playing 'safety dance' in the car for the trip to the range :lol:

Then you're all good.
Weatherby Mark V Accumark 7mm Rem. Mag.
Leupold VX-3 4.5-14x40mm

Browning BL-22 .22LR
User avatar
Weepy
Private
Private
 
Posts: 77
Victoria

Re: What would it take for a safety to fail

Post by loaded » 23 Feb 2014, 10:40 pm

It’s not a matter of the safety failing, it really dose. It’s a matter of the sear releasing the hammer onto the firing pin, this is the issue.

First the safety on most long-arms blocks the trigger, so if you drop a cocked gun with the safety on it will most likely fire. No fault of the safety, but the hammer/sear. The gun would have fired if the safety was off as well.

The sear holds the hammer, the hammer is under pressure from a spring, the hammer hits the firing pin or has the firing pin on it, hitting the primer. The trigger causes the sear to release the hammer. The safety on most longarms stops the trigger so you can see the issue.

As already said, its the hammer sear arrangement that gunsmiths play with to work the trigger. If they get it wrong and make the contact negative the slippage is greater, thus prone to accidental discharge. These same parts wear slowly during use giving the same result.

So with this all in mind do you use the safety?
Think of it this way would you change a tyre with the hand brake off?
No. Is the hand break on a guarantee the car won’t roll?
No. But it dose make it much safer.
loaded
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 12
Victoria

Next

Back to top
 
Return to Centerfire rifles