dustin wrote:Monty wrote:I wouldn't call it 'hoo haa' but there's a distinction to be made between "better" and "beneficial" which I think the majority of people overlook.
Yeah I'm with you. That's a good point.
FWIW I am privileged to regularly shoot one of the early sportco variants, submitted for testing, capable of taking a modified 10 shot or standard SLR mag. Despite the hole in the bottom of the action there is no appreciable difference in accuracy between it and a standard Omark using issue 144 grain 7.62.
Would that statement stand up to testing if a 30" barrel and target ammo used? I don't know?
In some eyes a magazine fed Omark is a better thing, to others the potential loss in accuracy is worse. (and the magazine is a pain in the arse prone)
If all you are ever going to do is shoot off the mound then the addition of a magazine is pointless and you are better off with a solid action in single shot.