flutch wrote:being in WA that looks like a licensing nightmare.
InisBineest wrote:I'd love to see a modern drilling made in more common calibers. Say 12g, .223, .308. I really enjoy firearms that are just not quite ordinary, but i can't affort to reload anything but the most common loads.
bladeracer wrote:If you're loading your own ammo it really doesn't matter if the cartridge is common. There is an argument that if you're only shooting .223 or .308 there's little to gain by reloading anyway as the ammo is cheap, especially after you sell the brass. Anything less common can be loaded for similar costs as it's really only the brass that is specific to a chambering, primers, powders and bullets are very generic and suit many different cartridges. And even if you have to pay $2 per case for something obscure, ten or twenty loads per case is still way cheaper than buying even the cheapest ammo.
InisBineest wrote:I hear that argument an awful lot, but I really can't swallow it. I can buy bulk Hornady or PPU .223 for about 50c a round, but I also could load them myself for about 38c a round, with the satisfaction and capacity to load them any which way I please. If you just want to shoot and are not fussed with penny's sure, buy what you like. But I have a teacher's salary, a mortgage and kids:) I'm not crying poor by any means, but it means I do have to budget to do what I love, and investing in the reloading gear I have when I was younger (no mortgage, no kids) was the best thing I ever did shooting wise.
I'd love to have something that is a little less common or a little more specialised, but i have to stick to what i can afford AND enjoy often. I mean i spent stupid money on a WFA1L, but only as i can afford to shoot it often:) Make sense? I couldn't do the same with say a Schmidt–Rubin straight pull, or even a 45-70 Sharps Rifle (which i would love one day!) as the ammo is just that little bit pricier for me just now. So while a drilling in 308/223/22lr might go as far as to offend some traditionalist, it could be awfully practical for some of us.
bladeracer wrote:Do the maths yourself then. You already have the reloading gear, right? So you pick yourself up something exotic, like an M1904 Portuguese Mauser in 6.5x58mm, ammo that has not been manufactured since the fifties. You can order custom dies for the specific cartridge for $2-300, or do as I do and use a Lee RGB 6.5x52mm Carcano die set for about $40. You buy a bunch of once-fired brass in .270 or .30-06 and run it through the Carcano die to neck it down to 6.5mm. Then you load it up with the same powder and primers you'd use in many other cartridges. Then you use the same 6.5mm bullets you'd use in any other 6.5mm cartridge. Get 20+ loads out of the brass and the cost of the brass is virtually nothing. You will have saved more than the cost of all your reloading equipment within just a few hundred rounds, if you could even buy 6.5x58mm ammo. You could _certainly_ afford to shoot 7.5x55mm if you load it yourself, probably cheaper than you're currently paying for your .223Rem ammo.
Buy a $50 mould and you can shoot even cheaper still.
InisBineest wrote:Don't get me wrong, i understand that reloading an exotic cartridge is far far cheaper than buying them new. And i also understand that those calibres can be doable in the long run for a reasonable price. But within the realm of reloading, 223 (or other 224 cal projectile based rounds), 308, (or other 30 cal based rounds) and 9mm/.38 all seem to be the cheapest to to run with. These loads are cheap to buy in small or bulk quantities, where as i find something such as 6.5mm rounds harder to get for the same economy. I know i'm scratching the difference between cheap and very cheap, but for me (and some others no doubt) that is a differnce. My argument is primarily against the notion that reloading for somthing as common as 223 is not worth it. 223 in any way you look at it is cheap, but reloaded 223 is simply cheaper in the long run. (And by my maths i broke even about 4 years ago for the cost of the gear:)
And hey, while a drilling in those cartridges would certainly not be traditional, i would wager there would be a small market for people who would buy it (small, but present) given that so many of us run those calibres anyway. Just a thought.
InisBineest wrote:Oh Hell no! No I wouldn't dare bastardise an old style drilling for the sake of cheaper ammo, they are works of art just as they are! I was being more wishful with the idea that somone might make something like the Savage model 24 but in the style of a drilling rather than a under over combo gun. Wishful thinking i know, but just something i would go for.
Muzzz wrote:I have a 30.06-30.06 20 gauge Merkel Bok Drilling , very nice gun