No1Mk3 wrote:frederick1942 wrote:I have posted information re my Plezier Mauser on this forum. I have not seen any reponses
G'day mate,
Sounds like a nice rifle, there is not much that can be told from what you have posted, a rifle belonging to a Burgher of the Orange Free State. The name does not come up in Boer Medals lists, so i would start a search for more info on Mr. Steyn by contacting Dave C. George, author of the book series "Carving from the Veldt" who has a deal of records and where to find more, You can contact him via his website boerwarriflecarvings.net. As to the history of the rifle on it's own, one of many Plezier that made it's way here either as the possession of a Boer Family migrating here at some time or a War Trophy bought back by an Allied soldier, it can't be known without original family provenance. Mr George may be able to start you down the path to finding who Vt. Steyn served with, his origins and then other history of his family, best of luck.
PS: Some pics of your rifle would be appreciated if you can, Cheers.
No1Mk3, Many thanks for this info; helped me out researching my own Boer War Rifle...
I have here a Boer War Rifle with a name of 'RJP Botha' carved into the buttstock.
[NOT a Plezier rifle; one that I believe to be part of a batch of rifles shipped to the Boers.
Directly above the left side of the receiver, the rifle is stamped as follows:
Model Mauser 1896 (Suspect this is date of issue, and NOT design year - Likely a 1893 or 1895 Mauser)
Ludwig Loewe & Co Berlin
In the left side of the breech, the following serial number is stamped: A 5139
This same number (A5139) is also stamped into the wooden stock; on the left hand side, and below the breech.
Same number is also stamped on the bottom front of the magazine floorplate(non-removable magazine), when you turn the rifle upside down.
The right-hand side of the wooden stock has carved in large letters: RJP BOTHA
It seems to be modified from the standard 1893, as it has a turned-down lip in the magazine follower-plate, which allows the bolt to be closed on an empty magazine; a design that (I'm led to believe) the standard 1893 model didn’t have.
Other reason I believe it to be 1893 rather than the later 1895, is the bottom of the bolt face is square, wheras the 1895 had a round lower bolt face.
There is apparently a further safety design that was added to the 1895, which this rifle likely doesn’t have, but I'll need to do a more detailed inspection of it to be absolutely certain.
However, with the square lower bolt-face, I think we are 99% certain of a Model 1893 Mauser.
[Or are they known as an 1893/95??]
From the serial Number [A 5139], this rifle was shipped to the South African Republic (Zuid Afrikaansche Republiek, more commonly known as the "Transvaal"), and NOT the Orange Free State.
Rifles shipped to the Orange Free State had 'OVS' stamped above the serial number, and on the stock, whereas the rifles shipped to the Transvaal, had either an 'A', 'B', or 'C' prefacing the serial number.
Ours has the 'A' prefix on the serial number.
From a search of the Boer War service rolls a few years back, I tracked down about a dozen 'R Botha's', but I'm not even sure they present their initials the same way as we do, so not sure if the names I got included the gent who owned this rifle.
Anyway, I have put a query in to Dave C. George, to see if he can suggest how I might find any more info of this rifle.
Thanks again.