in2anity wrote:If you keep your shots under 200m, IMO the pros of a 16” carbine outweigh the cons of a 24”, or even 20” rifle.
Give me a plastic carbine any day out in the sticks. And 762x39 region is just about ideal for the majority of Ozzie game. A pocket full of bullets goes a fair bit further also - I noticed that switching from the bigger 30/30 rounds.
horses for coarses i guess . the original light weight deer rifle , the model 94 30-30 , is quite light . makes for something that can be carried a long way . lighter than my syn 223 sauer, wish i still had a mates 223 t3 on hand to check it's weight . but 100 yards is about the limit i can shoot my 30-30 with any accuracy on account of the sights . a mate has a zastava in 7.62x39, that after bedding is a nice light accurate rifle . i can see why you would like one in2anity . i've hiked around the ridgeline country in northern nsw with my 8 1/2 lb model 70 6.5x55 . the sling was handy , but i never found it overly difficult . i had a mate who sung the praises of how light his tikka t3 was, in 300 win mag
. he hated shooting it but
barrel length is a funny one , depends on the round and how much velocity drop effects things i suppose. i've read the 16" special forces weapons aren't known for their stopping power in 223 , which is why the millitary is looking at increasing caliber