M92 32/20

Bolt action rifles, lever action, pump action, self loading rifles and other miscellaneous longarms.

M92 32/20

Post by Stoney » 03 Jun 2021, 4:55 pm

G'day Fellas,
I just recently picked up this nice condition M92 in 32/20. It has been re-blued, re-barreled and had other interesting things done to it. Upon inspection of the barrel it looks like a Lee Enfield .303 barrel was used with the HVSC stamp behind the rear sight, would this be correct? Also the stamp 310 + 32, does that mean it can use .310 Cadet + 32/20? I know they are very similar, but the Cadet runs a larger projectile in most cases. It also has cork bedding on the front end which is starting to degrade if anyone has a solution to it's replacement. I only want it for a fun, cheap, plinker so I will plonk a rear tang peep on it and see how I go. Cheers.
Attachments
92-4.jpg
92-4.jpg (27.36 KiB) Viewed 1244 times
92-3.jpg
92-3.jpg (30.7 KiB) Viewed 1244 times
92-2.jpg
92-2.jpg (34.09 KiB) Viewed 1244 times
92-1.jpg
92-1.jpg (37.28 KiB) Viewed 1244 times
User avatar
Stoney
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 395
Queensland

Re: M92 32/20

Post by LawrenceA » 03 Jun 2021, 6:17 pm

First question first
Yep a 310 barrel will go and as well as using a potentially larger bore the 310 has a thinner rim.
Basically dont use 310 ammo in it and as you will be reloading suggest to hammer one through to check bore size and use a bullet a coupla thou bigger.
Thing is it will be fun anyway but a small projectile is far more likely to leave leading and will be less accurate.

For the cork consider using card.
Loaded with TB the cost of a round is like 10 cents if you cast as well.
Real cheap to run and a ton of fun.
One well placed shot is all it takes.
LawrenceA
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 455
New South Wales

Re: M92 32/20

Post by No1Mk3 » 03 Jun 2021, 10:03 pm

G'day Stoney,
Yes, it is a former 303 barrel cut down and re-chambered to take 310 Cadet and 32-20. This is normally managed by making the base diameter a little larger than 310 and the rim thickness step deep enough (.065") for the 32-20. The 310 Cadet is nominally only .002" larger than the 32-20, although most reloaders prefer a 0.316" bullet and some Cadets like the 0.323. All of these will fire in a 303 barrel, but the 0.323 may foul fairly quick if you have a tight barrel. As for the front end, I would re-cork it with some gasket cork for a cheap quick fix, but a proper bedding compound would be best, Cheers.
No1Mk3
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2100
Victoria

Re: M92 32/20

Post by Gamerancher » 04 Jun 2021, 10:39 am

I don't know about "nice" condition, been "bubba'd" pretty well, but if it works and you didn't pay a lot for it, good luck to you.
As Lawrence suggested, slug the bore, .312 - .314 is usual for .32-20
If you let us know the serial number or at least the first three and number of digits, I could tell you what year it is. :drinks:
User avatar
Gamerancher
Sergeant Major
Sergeant Major
 
Posts: 1596
New South Wales

Re: M92 32/20

Post by bigrich » 04 Jun 2021, 12:50 pm

at least you found a good use for enfeild's stoney old mate , convert them to 32-20 :lol:
User avatar
bigrich
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 4505
Queensland

Re: M92 32/20

Post by Stoney » 04 Jun 2021, 4:23 pm

bigrich wrote:at least you found a good use for enfeild's stoney old mate , convert them to 32-20 :lol:


I'm going to make you buy one, one day :lol: :lol: :lol:

Gamerancher wrote:I don't know about "nice" condition, been "bubba'd" pretty well, but if it works and you didn't pay a lot for it, good luck to you.
As Lawrence suggested, slug the bore, .312 - .314 is usual for .32-20
If you let us know the serial number or at least the first three and number of digits, I could tell you what year it is. :drinks:


I bought it because it was cheap and non original Gamerancher, that way I can use it a lot and not worry about knocking it around and losing value. I don't think it's " bubba'd ". The work on it is neat and tidy, it's just a little bit more " utilitarian " and less beautiful. :lol: :lol: :lol: I always preferred function over form anyway :thumbsup: Oh and it's a 1909 rifle I believe.
User avatar
Stoney
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 395
Queensland


Back to top
 
Return to Centerfire rifles