leafs wrote:I have watched a few you tube videos where they are getting good groups and then they say the get a flier . This seems to happen often .
Is it the shooter, the ammo, the gun, or something else? I'm having the same problem. Any help Thanks
flashman wrote:Hay ..........question :can you break in a barrel and sight the weapon at the same time.....?
deanp100 wrote:Of course the whole group could be fliers and the odd one out was thr in,y one that went where it was supposed to. If your gun is average, and you are average it can cancel each other out and produce a good 3 shot group. But thr law of averages says it can’t keep happening like that.
leafs wrote:Will make some adjustments and shoot again . Will let you know . May bee a week before I get out
leafs wrote:I have watched a few you tube videos where they are getting good groups and then they say the get a flier . This seems to happen often .
Is it the shooter, the ammo, the gun, or something else? I'm having the same problem. Any help Thanks
JohnV wrote:deanp100 wrote:Of course the whole group could be fliers and the odd one out was thr in,y one that went where it was supposed to. If your gun is average, and you are average it can cancel each other out and produce a good 3 shot group. But thr law of averages says it can’t keep happening like that.
That would only be right if the whole group was quiet large but if you have 4 shots in a neat group and one way wide then you know that's a flyer when it happens consistently . It would be mechanically unusual for a gun to have a fault or the shooter a bad technique that was consistently putting 4 shots in a tight group off zero and only one shot on zero .
JohnV wrote:If you fire a 50 round group you are bringing in more variables like barrel heating , copper fouling , shooter fatigue , so it's not that relevant . A sudden unexplained shot way out of the nice forming group signals something is not behaving consistently be it the wind, the gun , ammo or the shooter .
Larry wrote:If you want the best number statistically for a good measurements then a sample size of 21 will give you a 2*SD or 99.96% confidence level.A group is more than 3 shots even 5 not enough at least 10
in2anity wrote:Larry wrote:If you want the best number statistically for a good measurements then a sample size of 21 will give you a 2*SD or 99.96% confidence level.A group is more than 3 shots even 5 not enough at least 10
It takes me weeks of matches, at varying ranges, to form an opinion on a load. Granted sling shooting slows this process down, but I am curious how one can “load develop” in groups of 3. Ludicrously small sample sizes…
JohnV wrote:Groups of 3 just saves components and gives an idea of what's really bad grouping and what's showing some promise .
Then you can concentrate more on those promising loads .
JohnV wrote:Nothing was said by the OP about Target shooting or Competition shooting .
JohnV wrote:Nothing was said by the OP about Target shooting or Competition shooting .