Ruger American centrefire and rimfire

Bolt action rifles, lever action, pump action, self loading rifles and other miscellaneous longarms.

Ruger American centrefire and rimfire

Post by Goshawk » 20 Apr 2014, 1:41 pm

Hi all,

Any got any experience with the Ruger American rifles? Either the centrefire or rimfire versions?

Both seem to have great reviews for a pretty cheap setup.

Is it hype?
Goshawk
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 117
Australian Capital Territory

Re: Ruger American centrefire and rimfire

Post by tiki » 21 Apr 2014, 9:24 am

Price is really the only selling point.

They were basically made to be cheap 'Hawkeyes' as far as I know.
CZ 452 .22 WMR
Savage Weather Warrior 16/116 FCSS .260 Rem
Winchester Model 1895 .30-40 Krag

Weaver K-Series 4x38
Zeiss Victory HT 2.5–10x50
User avatar
tiki
Private
Private
 
Posts: 69
Northern Territory

Re: Ruger American centrefire and rimfire

Post by Lorgar » 21 Apr 2014, 9:26 am

I haven't shot the American, but one thing I liked about the Hawkeye's was the Mauser action, which the American doesn't have.
User avatar
Lorgar
Second Lieutenant
Second Lieutenant
 
Posts: 2156
Victoria

Re: Ruger American centrefire and rimfire

Post by Sender » 21 Apr 2014, 9:29 am

It's cheaper so obviously something's had to be taken out.

In the case of the American it's using a lot of plastic instead of metal and wood.

Plastic stock, no metal floor plate, two stage safety instead of 3, plastic mag...
User avatar
Sender
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 216
South Australia

Re: Ruger American centrefire and rimfire

Post by Berper » 21 Apr 2014, 9:32 am

It has this "power bedding" too which I can't say I'm entirely convinced with.

It sits on two blocks (front and back) instead of being fully flush with the stock inletting. Ruger pitch this as a feature to free float the barrel for accuracy...

Personally I'd rather have a snug action all round and just float the front of the stock if needed. Raising the action instead of working the front seems ass backwards to me...

My 2c.
Berper
Private
Private
 
Posts: 98
Tasmania

Re: Ruger American centrefire and rimfire

Post by Combat_Wombat » 21 Apr 2014, 9:43 am

The stock manages to be the only thing that feels worse to handle then a Savage Axis but at the end of the day it doesn't make the deer any more dead
Remington 700 CDL .270
Rossi M92 44mag
CZ 452 deluxe .22LR
Howa 1500 .204
Savage FVSR 22
User avatar
Combat_Wombat
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 379
Queensland

Re: Ruger American centrefire and rimfire

Post by wrenchman » 21 Apr 2014, 10:43 am

My father in law has one I don't know why he bought it he has a few rifles and don't think he will ever hunt with it.

When I sighted it in, it shot good, no problems. His is a 30-06 and groups about what any rifle would get so for the money I can't complain.

I have been looking at the ..22 I like the fact that you can adjust the stock to fit.
wrenchman
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1347
United States of America

Re: Ruger American centrefire and rimfire

Post by Goshawk » 22 Apr 2014, 7:38 am

Mmm maybe not such a good option. The latest version of the Savage Axis will have the accu trigger. May be a better option. Plus you can get boyds stocks for them.

Then again, by the time you pay all that I'd be better of just getting a savage 10 fpck, 111 or a 116 that all have decent triggers and stocks on them.
Goshawk
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 117
Australian Capital Territory

Re: Ruger American centrefire and rimfire

Post by wrenchman » 22 Apr 2014, 9:59 am

Savage is well built I think the ruger American was built to try to compeat with savage and Remingtons 710 I like Remington but I am not a big fan of the 710 or 770
wrenchman
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1347
United States of America

Re: Ruger American centrefire and rimfire

Post by Sender » 22 Apr 2014, 11:04 am

Goshawk wrote:Mmm maybe not such a good option.


It's just their offering for that price point in the market.

Some people only want to spend $600 on a rifle, so Ruger built a rifle for $600.

Same as always, you get what you pay for.
User avatar
Sender
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 216
South Australia

Re: Ruger American centrefire and rimfire

Post by Seconds » 22 Apr 2014, 11:06 am

tiki wrote:They were basically made to be cheap 'Hawkeyes' as far as I know.


You couldn't even call them that.

Different action, different materials... Different rifle.
Sako 85 Hunter
.308 Winchester
User avatar
Seconds
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 357
New South Wales

Re: Ruger American centrefire and rimfire

Post by Walt68 » 31 May 2014, 3:40 pm

Got a Ruger American Compact .22 Magnum, tack driver at 100 metres.
Walt68
Private
Private
 
Posts: 77
Northern Territory

Re: Ruger American centrefire and rimfire

Post by tripletwo » 02 Jun 2014, 9:17 pm

They seem to be ok, shooting good for people.

No fancy walnut or hands on work, but they're cheap as chips so you'd expect it.

If it shoots good, that'll do?
User avatar
tripletwo
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 39
Northern Territory


Back to top
 
Return to Centerfire rifles