dnedative wrote:Would be like getting hit with a rock at that distance
bladeracer wrote:dnedative wrote:Would be like getting hit with a rock at that distance
From the target camera you can hear the shot fired 4.6km away about 2.5-seconds before the bullet impacts.
I couldn't find load data but he has shot the .375 Gibbs before using the Cheytac 350gn bullet. I'm guessing velocity around 3000fps but could be a bit higher. Puts the bullet about 230m above line of sight at the midway point, terminal velocity around 700fps which seems about right, time of flight about 13-seconds. Amazingly it drops to subsonic about halfway - but the BC of .988 helps it hang onto the remaining velocity very well indeed.
Boundry Rider wrote:Hope it's not filmed in WA.
WAPOL would have a fit and arrest everybody involved
northdude wrote:230m above line of sight. Thats a mortar
in2anity wrote:they need to just build the jackal gun and control from a computer. Then they'll be the best shooters in the world.
bladeracer wrote:I don't think Mark needs to remove himself from the equation though
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPxloOlzmjA
bigpete wrote:bladeracer wrote:dnedative wrote:Would be like getting hit with a rock at that distance
From the target camera you can hear the shot fired 4.6km away about 2.5-seconds before the bullet impacts.
I couldn't find load data but he has shot the .375 Gibbs before using the Cheytac 350gn bullet. I'm guessing velocity around 3000fps but could be a bit higher. Puts the bullet about 230m above line of sight at the midway point, terminal velocity around 700fps which seems about right, time of flight about 13-seconds. Amazingly it drops to subsonic about halfway - but the BC of .988 helps it hang onto the remaining velocity very well indeed.
350gn at 700fps would definitely not be like being hit by a rock.....
in2anity wrote:bladeracer wrote:I don't think Mark needs to remove himself from the equation though
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPxloOlzmjA
Yeah with his offhand, I guess he goes about average for a shooting enthusiast. I’m sure you could do that too Blade, given enough ammo. I’ve seen your offhand vids - you can shoot offhand! Granted he seems like a good F class shooter - although I think he literally does do F class?
His offhand “shotgun” stance isn’t conducive to accuracy though, considering he’s shooting slowly and carefully. Needs to pop the hip out and tuck that arm in.
dnedative wrote:bigpete wrote:350gn at 700fps would definitely not be like being hit by a rock.....
I dont know, I can throw em pretty hard
in2anity wrote:bladeracer wrote:I don't think Mark needs to remove himself from the equation though
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pPxloOlzmjA
Yeah with his offhand, I guess he goes about average for a shooting enthusiast. I’m sure you could do that too Blade, given enough ammo. I’ve seen your offhand vids - you can shoot offhand! Granted he seems like a good F class shooter - although I think he literally does do F class?
His offhand “shotgun” stance isn’t conducive to accuracy though, considering he’s shooting slowly and carefully. Needs to pop the hip out and tuck that arm in.
on_one_wheel wrote:Taking offhand pot shots that far with open sights on a windy day, I doubt stance would really help greatly
I'm surprised he wasn't throwing them over his shoulder with the aid of a mirror to sight.
on_one_wheel wrote:I'll add one thing to stance, personally I find it impossible to stick my elbow into my hip like you should, perhaps that works well with narrow shoulders, average muscle & fat mass and reasonable flexibility? For me, unfortunately it just doesn't work.
on_one_wheel wrote:Taking offhand pot shots that far with open sights on a windy day, I doubt stance would really help greatly
I'm surprised he wasn't throwing them over his shoulder with the aid of a mirror to sight.
I'll add one thing to stance, personally I find it impossible to stick my elbow into my hip like you should, perhaps that works well with narrow shoulders, average muscle & fat mass and reasonable flexibility? For me, unfortunately it just doesn't work.
in2anity wrote:on_one_wheel wrote:Taking offhand pot shots that far with open sights on a windy day, I doubt stance would really help greatly
I'm surprised he wasn't throwing them over his shoulder with the aid of a mirror to sight.
Couldn't agree more. Which is why I'm not that impressed by particularly those videos. Of course he will hit it, if enough slugs get sent down - it's a statistical certainty. If yu wanna see some good offhand shooting go to a OPM Metallic Silhouette shoot - those guys are the pinnacle of offhand. Now that's impressive. But even Service Rifle shooters get very good at it too - there are some phenomenal offhand shooters in our SR club, who get particularly good at higher speed offhand. That's when the shotgun pose comes into its own.on_one_wheel wrote:I'll add one thing to stance, personally I find it impossible to stick my elbow into my hip like you should, perhaps that works well with narrow shoulders, average muscle & fat mass and reasonable flexibility? For me, unfortunately it just doesn't work.
At the end of the day you gotta do what works for you. i know plenty of amazing offhand service shooters who only shoot from the shotgun pose, As i mentioned, the shotgun pose actually suited to offhand shooting that requires quick follow up shots. It's just the slow fire applications and deliberates where you see particularly Master grade shooters doing the weird olympic pose. But then they generally switch to the shotgun pose for the stage2 which will often be a quick fire course - and they don't drop the gun from the shoulder. Quick reload/target-acquisition, slow aim - that's the ticket.
bladeracer wrote:, better with something with an extended magazine..