Schadenfreude wrote:Can anyone suggest a Sporting Rifle that will load from the magazine and chamber 80gr .223 projectiles as I have a few.I have been shooting them for years in my Omark and my No4 conversion will only handle 69grs.I have been looking at the Henry Long Ranger.It does not have to be minute of angle,just minute of animal.
Schadenfreude wrote:Can anyone suggest a Sporting Rifle that will load from the magazine and chamber 80gr .223 projectiles as I have a few.I have been shooting them for years in my Omark and my No4 conversion will only handle 69grs.I have been looking at the Henry Long Ranger.It does not have to be minute of angle,just minute of animal.
Schadenfreude wrote:Can anyone suggest a Sporting Rifle that will load from the magazine and chamber 80gr .223 projectiles as I have a few.I have been shooting them for years in my Omark and my No4 conversion will only handle 69grs.I have been looking at the Henry Long Ranger.It does not have to be minute of angle,just minute of animal.
Schadenfreude wrote:Thanks for your suggestions, a few things to think about.
Schadenfreude wrote:Thanks for your input,I have plenty of larger calibre rifles,I'm just enquiring if anyone can tell me what off the shelf rifles can chamber and fire 80gr projectile from the magazine.Anyone with a Long Ranger 223?
bladeracer wrote:Schadenfreude wrote:Thanks for your input,I have plenty of larger calibre rifles,I'm just enquiring if anyone can tell me what off the shelf rifles can chamber and fire 80gr projectile from the magazine.Anyone with a Long Ranger 223?
All .223Rem rifles can chamber and feed 80gn bullets from the magazine, you just have to seat the bullet short enough to work. If you load them at the standard 2.260" it will feed through all .223 rifles. But you lose some potential velocity due to the reduced case volume.
The Long Ranger has a 9"-twist so will struggle with most of the 80gn bullets available, most are VLD or ELD designs which are too long. But some designs have long polymer tips that can be removed to shorten the bullet significantly. The rifle appears to be a short-action in all chamberings so should be able to feed cartridges up to 2.800" in length, but the .223 mags may be blocked for the 2.260" .223 cartridge, as may the bolt stop - these may not be insurmountable though. I would have to actually handle one to see for sure.
Oldbloke wrote:You may have considered it, but might just to be easier to buy a 243?
Jorlcrin wrote:
I'm finding the .243 doesnt get a lot of work these days, since we started using the 69gn and 75gn pills in both our .223's.