The 222

Bolt action rifles, lever action, pump action, self loading rifles and other miscellaneous longarms.

Re: The 222

Post by bigpete » 28 Dec 2024, 9:18 pm

Unless you're using bore rider slugs in your shotgun they're likely .690.

I'm talking about .40+ calibre 500gn at 2100fps
bigpete
Brigadier
Brigadier
 
Posts: 4083
South Australia

Re: The 222

Post by Oldbloke » 28 Dec 2024, 9:20 pm

Awww chucks
The greatest invention in the history of man is beer.
https://youtu.be/2v3QrUvYj-Y
SSAA, the powerful gun lobby. :lol: :lol: :lol: Now I'm a member. :unknown:
Hunt safe. A bit more bang is better.
User avatar
Oldbloke
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 12771
Victoria

Re: The 222

Post by bigrich » 29 Dec 2024, 6:53 am

bigpete wrote:Unless you're using bore rider slugs in your shotgun they're likely .690.

I'm talking about .40+ calibre 500gn at 2100fps


unfortunately , that equals lots of $$$$ . gotta win the lotto and employ that personal gun smith :lol:
User avatar
bigrich
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 4994
Queensland

Re: The 222

Post by bigpete » 29 Dec 2024, 8:12 am

bigrich wrote:
bigpete wrote:Unless you're using bore rider slugs in your shotgun they're likely .690.

I'm talking about .40+ calibre 500gn at 2100fps


unfortunately , that equals lots of $$$$ . gotta win the lotto and employ that personal gun smith :lol:


No it doesn't. At one stage I owned a 458wm model 70 for which I paid 1200 for including loaded ammo and dies and a leupold scope.
Yes,I made money off it when I sold it lol
bigpete
Brigadier
Brigadier
 
Posts: 4083
South Australia

Re: The 222

Post by bigrich » 29 Dec 2024, 8:19 am

bigpete wrote:
bigrich wrote:
bigpete wrote:Unless you're using bore rider slugs in your shotgun they're likely .690.

I'm talking about .40+ calibre 500gn at 2100fps


unfortunately , that equals lots of $$$$ . gotta win the lotto and employ that personal gun smith :lol:


No it doesn't. At one stage I owned a 458wm model 70 for which I paid 1200 for including loaded ammo and dies and a leupold scope.
Yes,I made money off it when I sold it lol


i think you got lucky with good buying in the first place mate . it's rare to buy a second hand gun and make money when you sell it . well done :thumbsup:
User avatar
bigrich
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 4994
Queensland

Re: The 222

Post by AZZA'S HJ47 » 29 Dec 2024, 9:13 pm

I built my self a bsa cf2 222 that I picked up years ago at my local the barrel was cooked so it had seen plenty of work. I had Swan put another 222 barrel on the rifle and rather go for the 1-14 twist i went for a 1-12 set up.

Absolutely brilliant with either a hornady 50g soft point or 55g super roo projectiles to tell you the truth probably shoots these a little better than my 223 rifles. Took my first red deer with the rifle foxes, cats, rabits, and pigs its honestly taken them all.

It is my go to rifle when ever I go out I have 2 tikka 223 rifles in the safe and neither are what I call my go to hunting rifle. Dirty old Bsa Cf2 with a cerakote job on it ill never sell this rifle and I have plenty of brass to see me well into my older years.

I have a plan to build a 222 remington Magnum at some point but thats a story for another day.
Sako Varmint 243,Marlin 917, Lithgow La101 .22 , 1917 BSA 303 (ted), Finnish Vkt 1944 M39,T3X Super Varmint 223, Marlin 1895 SBL 45-70 Howa 1500 308, BSA CF2 222, 1911 9mm, Adler 12G, Sako 7mm rem Mag,Ruger m77 mk1 22-250AI, Rem 700 17 Rem, BSA No 5 303
User avatar
AZZA'S HJ47
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 695
Queensland

Re: The 222

Post by bigrich » 30 Dec 2024, 4:42 am

AZZA'S HJ47 wrote:I built my self a bsa cf2 222 that I picked up years ago at my local the barrel was cooked so it had seen plenty of work. I had Swan put another 222 barrel on the rifle and rather go for the 1-14 twist i went for a 1-12 set up.

Absolutely brilliant with either a hornady 50g soft point or 55g super roo projectiles to tell you the truth probably shoots these a little better than my 223 rifles. Took my first red deer with the rifle foxes, cats, rabits, and pigs its honestly taken them all.

It is my go to rifle when ever I go out I have 2 tikka 223 rifles in the safe and neither are what I call my go to hunting rifle. Dirty old Bsa Cf2 with a cerakote job on it ill never sell this rifle and I have plenty of brass to see me well into my older years.

I have a plan to build a 222 remington Magnum at some point but thats a story for another day.


i remember when you posted on getting your CF2 rebarreled years ago , glad to hear it's a real gem of a rifle . my old 222 xtr model 70 with a 12 twist used to make one hole at 100 with 55 vmax and BM2 . i had a lot of faith in swan barrels back then . kiwi cullers used the 222 to great effect on everything including reds , which get bigger over in NZ i'm told . how is the trigger on the CF2 ? :thumbsup:
User avatar
bigrich
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 4994
Queensland

Re: The 222

Post by AZZA'S HJ47 » 30 Dec 2024, 10:33 am

I played with the original trigger and I ultimately ended up stuffing it. I was lucky enough for me at least that at the time the barn had a second hand one on the shelf. I polished the engagement points on the trigger and honestly the triggers good. Not quite a tikka trigger but good enough for my needs.

Ill probably build my 222 rm on a rem 700 I have sitting in the safe although converting my tikka to a 222 rm also appeals to me.
Sako Varmint 243,Marlin 917, Lithgow La101 .22 , 1917 BSA 303 (ted), Finnish Vkt 1944 M39,T3X Super Varmint 223, Marlin 1895 SBL 45-70 Howa 1500 308, BSA CF2 222, 1911 9mm, Adler 12G, Sako 7mm rem Mag,Ruger m77 mk1 22-250AI, Rem 700 17 Rem, BSA No 5 303
User avatar
AZZA'S HJ47
Sergeant
Sergeant
 
Posts: 695
Queensland

Re: The 222

Post by Cape_Yorkee » 30 Dec 2024, 11:05 am

The used BSA's I have been looking at seem very reasonable and look the goods. Have read a few things about the triggers being a bit of an issue - but same thing for the 788's - though from all reports the BSA's are just as accurate.

Anyone ever had a Sportco model 33? My old man had a 22LR Sportco which I unfortunately had to move on years ago (still have quite a few spare magazines if anyone's keen) and it was a great shooter
Rossi Rio Bravo 22LR
BSA CF2 222
Tikka T3X 243
BRNO ZKK601 308
Cape_Yorkee
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 28
Queensland

Re: The 222

Post by bigrich » 30 Dec 2024, 12:54 pm

Cape_Yorkee wrote:The used BSA's I have been looking at seem very reasonable and look the goods. Have read a few things about the triggers being a bit of an issue - but same thing for the 788's - though from all reports the BSA's are just as accurate.

Anyone ever had a Sportco model 33? My old man had a 22LR Sportco which I unfortunately had to move on years ago (still have quite a few spare magazines if anyone's keen) and it was a great shooter


a fella at my local range has a sportco 33 in 222 . apparently spare mags are impossible to find . his however is a constant source of feed jams . well made rifle though, i like it . just be aware fellas if building on rem 700's ,if it needs a new early style riveted extractor their unobtainable . both my recent rem 700 builds, 222 and 250 savage both needed a sako extractor conversion. the 222 took some tweaking with the ejector plunger spring to get right :thumbsup:
User avatar
bigrich
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 4994
Queensland

Re: The 222

Post by bigrich » 30 Dec 2024, 1:03 pm

AZZA'S HJ47 wrote:I played with the original trigger and I ultimately ended up stuffing it. I was lucky enough for me at least that at the time the barn had a second hand one on the shelf. I polished the engagement points on the trigger and honestly the triggers good. Not quite a tikka trigger but good enough for my needs.

Ill probably build my 222 rm on a rem 700 I have sitting in the safe although converting my tikka to a 222 rm also appeals to me.


mag length could be the issue for 222 mag . rem 700 internal mags can be modified for more col , but i think tikka mags are a little longer in standard form compared to the rem 700. the waterman mags can be had for tikkas and come in all different col variations . however i'm just not keen on having a big chunky 10 round mag hanging off the bottom of my rifles .

i was always interested in the 6mm version of the 222 rem mag myself . especially long throated for heavier projectiles and case powder capacity :thumbsup:
User avatar
bigrich
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 4994
Queensland

Re: The 222

Post by mickb » 30 Dec 2024, 1:49 pm

bigrich wrote:
bigpete wrote:
bigrich wrote:
bigpete wrote:Unless you're using bore rider slugs in your shotgun they're likely .690.

I'm talking about .40+ calibre 500gn at 2100fps


unfortunately , that equals lots of $$$$ . gotta win the lotto and employ that personal gun smith :lol:


No it doesn't. At one stage I owned a 458wm model 70 for which I paid 1200 for including loaded ammo and dies and a leupold scope.
Yes,I made money off it when I sold it lol


i think you got lucky with good buying in the first place mate . it's rare to buy a second hand gun and make money when you sell it . well done :thumbsup:


You could still get by by rebarreling an old old 300win I'm pretty sure. Zastavas in 458winmmag are still around $1800 new if you can find one in stock.

Less options than there used to be though. There were half a dozen brands just a few years ago you could pick up a 458 under $1500. Cz550, Rem 783, whitworth etc. even old brno 602's went cheap
mickb
Warrant Officer C1
Warrant Officer C1
 
Posts: 1393
Other

Re: The 222

Post by Cape_Yorkee » 30 Dec 2024, 2:51 pm

bigrich wrote:
Cape_Yorkee wrote:The used BSA's I have been looking at seem very reasonable and look the goods. Have read a few things about the triggers being a bit of an issue - but same thing for the 788's - though from all reports the BSA's are just as accurate.

Anyone ever had a Sportco model 33? My old man had a 22LR Sportco which I unfortunately had to move on years ago (still have quite a few spare magazines if anyone's keen) and it was a great shooter


a fella at my local range has a sportco 33 in 222 . apparently spare mags are impossible to find . his however is a constant source of feed jams . well made rifle though, i like it . just be aware fellas if building on rem 700's ,if it needs a new early style riveted extractor their unobtainable . both my recent rem 700 builds, 222 and 250 savage both needed a sako extractor conversion. the 222 took some tweaking with the ejector plunger spring to get right :thumbsup:


What would your advice be bigrich for the trigger on a well used 788? Good solid clean and away you go, or time for a new Timney?
Rossi Rio Bravo 22LR
BSA CF2 222
Tikka T3X 243
BRNO ZKK601 308
Cape_Yorkee
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 28
Queensland

Re: The 222

Post by bigrich » 30 Dec 2024, 3:38 pm

Cape_Yorkee wrote:
bigrich wrote:
Cape_Yorkee wrote:The used BSA's I have been looking at seem very reasonable and look the goods. Have read a few things about the triggers being a bit of an issue - but same thing for the 788's - though from all reports the BSA's are just as accurate.

Anyone ever had a Sportco model 33? My old man had a 22LR Sportco which I unfortunately had to move on years ago (still have quite a few spare magazines if anyone's keen) and it was a great shooter


a fella at my local range has a sportco 33 in 222 . apparently spare mags are impossible to find . his however is a constant source of feed jams . well made rifle though, i like it . just be aware fellas if building on rem 700's ,if it needs a new early style riveted extractor their unobtainable . both my recent rem 700 builds, 222 and 250 savage both needed a sako extractor conversion. the 222 took some tweaking with the ejector plunger spring to get right :thumbsup:


What would your advice be bigrich for the trigger on a well used 788? Good solid clean and away you go, or time for a new Timney?


rem 788 triggers are different from the 700 series , they have a bolt stop incorporated into the trigger . to the best of my knowledge timney do make a aftermarket trigger for the 788 , according to their website it's a drop in and adjust like their other triggers . in the pic it's looks like it's got a better bolt stop than a factory one . that is a 788 weakness , they can break with rigorous use . modifying factory rem triggers is a funny thing . the 700 series are known for going off if adjusted improperly . having a smith tweak the factory trigger for you might be a lot cheaper , but timneys are great . i did a quick net search and brownells oz can get them for around $400 posted . not cheap . i have timney's in all my rifles . except my tikka t3's . there's no need as a adjusted tikka trigger is the equal of a timney IMHO
User avatar
bigrich
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 4994
Queensland

Re: The 222

Post by bigpete » 30 Dec 2024, 3:49 pm

Just put a biro spring in it like the old man did lol
bigpete
Brigadier
Brigadier
 
Posts: 4083
South Australia

Re: The 222

Post by bigrich » 30 Dec 2024, 4:13 pm

bigpete wrote:Just put a biro spring in it like the old man did lol


what brand of biro pete ? ;)
User avatar
bigrich
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 4994
Queensland

Re: The 222

Post by bladeracer » 30 Dec 2024, 4:14 pm

bigrich wrote:
bigpete wrote:Just put a biro spring in it like the old man did lol


what brand of biro pete ? ;)


Biro is a brand :-)
Practice Strict Gun Control - Precision Counts!
User avatar
bladeracer
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 13470
Victoria

Re: The 222

Post by bigrich » 30 Dec 2024, 4:25 pm

bladeracer wrote:
bigrich wrote:
bigpete wrote:Just put a biro spring in it like the old man did lol


what brand of biro pete ? ;)


Biro is a brand :-)


really :shock: oh aren't i silly .

i suppose if you want a really good trigger you could pinch the spring out of a "paper mate" or some other upmarket ball point pen :D
User avatar
bigrich
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 4994
Queensland

Re: The 222

Post by bigpete » 31 Dec 2024, 5:15 am

bigrich wrote:
bigpete wrote:Just put a biro spring in it like the old man did lol


what brand of biro pete ? ;)


Dad used a Bic spring from memory. Nearly all the old fox shooters he was friends with used to do similar. Some of their triggers were quite scarily light lol
bigpete
Brigadier
Brigadier
 
Posts: 4083
South Australia

Re: The 222

Post by on_one_wheel » 31 Dec 2024, 7:12 am

At one point I had an improperly adjusted rem 700 trigger, the trigger job was performed by a smith. :shock:
I had it go off when I stood up from watching over a warren, all I did was apply the safety and BANG!... I wasn't 100% sure if I messed up or the rifle faulted ?

The second time it happened, a visitor was at the bench, he settled in on the target, took the shot, looked at me and said "I didn't even touch the trigger"
At that point I decided it was time to learn how to properly adjust the rem 700 triggers.
Both my 700s are set to 2.5 lb, zero creep, and feel precisely the same as each other, breaks like glass :thumbsup:
Last edited by on_one_wheel on 31 Dec 2024, 7:16 am, edited 1 time in total.
Gun control requires concentration and a steady hand
User avatar
on_one_wheel
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3801
South Australia

Re: The 222

Post by bigrich » 31 Dec 2024, 7:16 am

bigpete wrote:
bigrich wrote:
bigpete wrote:Just put a biro spring in it like the old man did lol


what brand of biro pete ? ;)


Dad used a Bic spring from memory. Nearly all the old fox shooters he was friends with used to do similar. Some of their triggers were quite scarily light lol


i like a 2lb trigger on my mauser 98 and rem 700's , set up with timney's . my tikkas are set up with 2 1/4lb factory triggers . i'm very wary of having super light triggers . rem 700's were known for being dangerous with very light triggers . the most scary light trigger i ever encountered was on a early brno hornet with the set trigger . sneeze and it'd go off . could've adjusted it somewhat but set triggers are too much stuffing around for me . like AO scopes . point and shoot without having to think about anything except maybe lead and holdover . young fellas at the range with tacticool rifles with big mag scopes telling their going pig hunting make me giggle :D

anyway , back on topic , triple deuce is accuracy king , anyone who doesn't own one is a lefty bohemian and not one of the cool kids . end of story :lol:
Last edited by bigrich on 31 Dec 2024, 7:25 am, edited 2 times in total.
User avatar
bigrich
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 4994
Queensland

Re: The 222

Post by bladeracer » 31 Dec 2024, 7:19 am

on_one_wheel wrote:At one point I had an improperly adjusted rem 700 trigger, the trigger job was performed by a smith.
I had it go off when I stood up from watching over a warren, all I did was apply the safety and BANG!... I wasn't 100% sure if I messed up or the rifle faulted ?

The second time it happened, a visitor was at the bench, he settled in on the target, took the shot, looked at me and said "I didn't even touch the trigger"
At that point I decided it was time to learn how to properly adjust the rem 700 triggers.
Both my 700s are set to 2.5 lb, zero creep, and feel precisely the same as each other, breaks like glass :thumbsup:


Wasn't this a recall issue at Remington?
https://www.ssaa.org.au/?ss_news=voluntary-recall-on-remington-model-7-and-700-rifles
Practice Strict Gun Control - Precision Counts!
User avatar
bladeracer
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 13470
Victoria

Re: The 222

Post by bigrich » 31 Dec 2024, 7:22 am

bladeracer wrote:
on_one_wheel wrote:At one point I had an improperly adjusted rem 700 trigger, the trigger job was performed by a smith.
I had it go off when I stood up from watching over a warren, all I did was apply the safety and BANG!... I wasn't 100% sure if I messed up or the rifle faulted ?

The second time it happened, a visitor was at the bench, he settled in on the target, took the shot, looked at me and said "I didn't even touch the trigger"
At that point I decided it was time to learn how to properly adjust the rem 700 triggers.
Both my 700s are set to 2.5 lb, zero creep, and feel precisely the same as each other, breaks like glass :thumbsup:


Wasn't this a recall issue at Remington?
https://www.ssaa.org.au/?ss_news=voluntary-recall-on-remington-model-7-and-700-rifles


yes mate , and the 222 and rem 700 creator mike walker helped people suing remington because they cost cut his original trigger design which created the dangerous situation and loss of life .
User avatar
bigrich
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 4994
Queensland

Re: The 222

Post by on_one_wheel » 31 Dec 2024, 7:23 am

I don't think so, I'll check out I'm pretty sure mine are too old for that.
Gun control requires concentration and a steady hand
User avatar
on_one_wheel
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3801
South Australia

Re: The 222

Post by on_one_wheel » 31 Dec 2024, 7:25 am

Just looked, my 700s were built waaaay before that date :thumbsup:
Gun control requires concentration and a steady hand
User avatar
on_one_wheel
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3801
South Australia

Re: The 222

Post by Cape_Yorkee » 31 Dec 2024, 8:54 am

on_one_wheel wrote:Just looked, my 700s were built waaaay before that date :thumbsup:


Safe to say the 788's were well before this time, too. But like the idea of a good smith checking things out.

Gotta say... a nice looking BSA... could be a winner!
Rossi Rio Bravo 22LR
BSA CF2 222
Tikka T3X 243
BRNO ZKK601 308
Cape_Yorkee
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 28
Queensland

Re: The 222

Post by bigrich » 31 Dec 2024, 9:36 am

Cape_Yorkee wrote:
on_one_wheel wrote:Just looked, my 700s were built waaaay before that date :thumbsup:


Safe to say the 788's were well before this time, too. But like the idea of a good smith checking things out.

Gotta say... a nice looking BSA... could be a winner!


not a bad idea to get a smith to check out a second hand rifle anyway . check head space , tickle the trigger . a recrown can bring new life into a old gun sometimes too . i had a old turk mauser 8x57 that had no rifling for the first couple of inches from the throat . but it'd been cut down to 20" and could hold 1 MOA @ 100 with the old field instrument peep sight that was on it and handloads . amazed the hell out of me :thumbsup:
User avatar
bigrich
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 4994
Queensland

Re: The 222

Post by Cape_Yorkee » 04 Jan 2025, 1:01 pm

Well... I bit the bullet and purchased a 2nd hand BSA .222 earlier today. Believe it's a CF2 model, so by no means as rare or as sought after as the Hunter or Majestic models. Its marked as good condition and the GS owner said the bore and barrel 'seem very decent'. Plenty of life left in. I know I could be buying a roughie but don't mind too much. If it turns out to be a project - so be it. I'll enjoy learning all about it while doing it. The rifle has sat in the back of a GS in Deniliquin for many years and before that was owned by a local farmer who kept it behind his back seat for many years. That in itself is pretty cool... it has character straight up.

Did read some interesting facts on a few UK rifle sites that although the BSA's weren't a very fancied brand over there the CF2's were more popular than their other models in NZ and Aus. They are known to be a heavy gun for their size but with very little faults (apart from a heavy trigger, which can be easily tinkered with). They are marked as very accurate rifles also. Perhaps agricultural or industrial are the best words to describe it.
Rossi Rio Bravo 22LR
BSA CF2 222
Tikka T3X 243
BRNO ZKK601 308
Cape_Yorkee
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 28
Queensland

Re: The 222

Post by bigrich » 04 Jan 2025, 1:37 pm

Cape_Yorkee wrote:Well... I bit the bullet and purchased a 2nd hand BSA .222 earlier today. Believe it's a CF2 model, so by no means as rare or as sought after as the Hunter or Majestic models. Its marked as good condition and the GS owner said the bore and barrel 'seem very decent'. Plenty of life left in. I know I could be buying a roughie but don't mind too much. If it turns out to be a project - so be it. I'll enjoy learning all about it while doing it. The rifle has sat in the back of a GS in Deniliquin for many years and before that was owned by a local farmer who kept it behind his back seat for many years. That in itself is pretty cool... it has character straight up.

Did read some interesting facts on a few UK rifle sites that although the BSA's weren't a very fancied brand over there the CF2's were more popular than their other models in NZ and Aus. They are known to be a heavy gun for their size but with very little faults (apart from a heavy trigger, which can be easily tinkered with). They are marked as very accurate rifles also. Perhaps agricultural or industrial are the best words to describe it.


i think you'll find it'll be a good rifle . did you buy the one off usedguns for around $500 ? i saw that and thought it worth mentioning . cheers
User avatar
bigrich
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 4994
Queensland

Re: The 222

Post by Cape_Yorkee » 04 Jan 2025, 7:07 pm

Yes that one does look good but that's the Monarch model - nothing against it. The one I nabbed was off ozgun (not sure if im allowed to post the link or not) - similar price though included free transfer to Cairns. Winning! Just going off photos I have a better gut feel about mine compared to the Monarch at Safari firearms. I've dealt with Safari before... they are very good to deal with though
Rossi Rio Bravo 22LR
BSA CF2 222
Tikka T3X 243
BRNO ZKK601 308
Cape_Yorkee
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 28
Queensland

PreviousNext

Back to top
 
Return to Centerfire rifles