by cadet » 03 Jan 2025, 9:49 am
I can't help you with the really big stuff, but I just went out to the shed and took some approximate measurements:
.303 - roughly 1.875" across the breech; .260" in the chambers' walls; .100" in the walls at the muzzle; weight about 10lbs (correction; that seemed to heavy - 8lbs 10oz is the correct number).
.360 #2NE - 2" across the breech; .270" in the chamber walls; .100" in the walls at the muzzle; also 10lbs roughly
.577/.500#2 BPE - 2.075 across the breech, .210" in the chambers, .100" in the muzzle walls
For comparison, the chunkiest British 12b I own is 2.35" across the breech, .200" in the walls, and about .40" in the barrel walls back behind the choke (this is fairly thick by vintage British standards; and those guns are usually near that thinness by the time you're 12" from the breech; weight-saving is important); my 28b hammer gun is 1.8" across the breech.
So no, for all but the biggest rifle cartridges and then the bore rifles, I couldn't imagine they would dwarf a 12b double; but they will be considerably heavier.
Some observations: shotguns are, of course, generally lighter and livelier for fast-moving game, with very thin tubes out past the chambers; double rifles tend to have thinner barrels than singles to try to reduce weight, and being soldered to another barrel lends the stiffness needed for accuracy. Double rifles tend to be muzzle heavy: where shotguns tend to balance a few inches forward of the trigger, at or near the hinge, between the hands, rifles tend to balance a couple of inches forward - nearer the front hand, which lends momentum for a sure swing and less muzzle jump to make use of that second immediately available shot. Even my 12b ball-and-shot gun - which mostly looks like a shotgun, but for the sights - still balances forward, with slightly thicker and shorter barrels.
Last edited by
cadet on 05 Jan 2025, 5:30 pm, edited 1 time in total.