Realistically you need two rifles.
One show pony and one workhorse.
You already mentioned the stainless Rossi 357 octagonal barrel you previously owned in your original post. And that probably would be the one. It’s gorgeous and feels right. Yes it’s heavy but they all are unless you go with a synthetic and that feels wrong.
There is something to be said for buying back a gun you owned in your youth or years ago. It just fills a hole. I don’t know what it is. Past regrets.
I think you go full cowboy or go home. Yeah I want the 92 . Delete the safety. And I have to have octagonal barrel. A nice long one.
357 or maybe 44 40.
I think the Rossi is the compromise on price so you can use it on the field. Out of the box who knows what you’re getting. It might need some work. It’s never going to be perfect. It probably won’t shoot everything you feed it. Is what it is.
Let’s take a different tangent for your consideration. There’s also the mag fed henry supreme which I’d be very keen on in 223. Takes Pmags.
That’s going in another direction but makes a lot of sense head over heart.
https://www.henryusa.com/rifles/lever-a ... eme-rifle/Now does that thing look ugly. Does it look wrong. I don’t think it does. I think they’ve nailed it. I think somebody has finally got it right bringing the lever action into modern contemporary . I think John Browning would be impressed.
And some of the modern tactical lever constructions or late have been not so nice on the eye.
If we had sensible gun laws they’d ban synthetic stocks on lever actions. But we don’t.
I dream of a world where chickens can cross the road without having their motives questioned