sungazer wrote:I don't even know what you mean by that. It sure isn't constructive to the conversation so why bother.
sungazer wrote:Well this is Australian forum
Title_II wrote:sungazer wrote:Well this is Australian forum
No, it's not. That's specifically why the name was changed.
Of course, it is Australian-centric from a practical standpoint.
Cryptic wrote:Title_II wrote:sungazer wrote:Well this is Australian forum
No, it's not. That's specifically why the name was changed.
Of course, it is Australian-centric from a practical standpoint.
Lol. I know theres variety here but the top header does say Australian shooting community so I assumed it was Australian only when I first came here too. I dont mind as gives more perspectives.
Jakethefake wrote:I wonder if it would be possible for someone to produce the Troy AR under licence in Australia. Small volumes just for the Australian market. Would get around the customs issue. Would be expensive, but surely cheaper than developing a rifle from scratch.
MeccaOz wrote:Unfortunatley mate, the powers that be put a clause in our states firearms agreement that says something to the tune of "No you cant have ANYTHING that MAY resemble a military appearance".
Antie wrote:It's black!
I'm scared!
MeccaOz wrote: "No you cant have ANYTHING that MAY resemble a military I". A few startups here have tried straight pull AR's but couldnt get them legal. l:
Bushie wrote:MeccaOz wrote: "No you cant have ANYTHING that MAY resemble a military I". A few startups here have tried straight pull AR's but couldnt get them legal. l:
Isn't the WFA1 Legal by Warrick Firearms??
bladeracer wrote:Bushie wrote:MeccaOz wrote: "No you cant have ANYTHING that MAY resemble a military I". A few startups here have tried straight pull AR's but couldnt get them legal. l:
Isn't the WFA1 Legal by Warrick Firearms??
Not in WA, NSW or ACT.
http://www.warwickfirearms.com.au/products/recreation-and-hunting/wfa1-bolt-action-rifle/