Westy wrote:bigfellascott wrote:Lorgar wrote:Internal box mag for sure.
Love the Ruger magazine. Hate the Tikka magazine.
It takes the same time (faster even) to top load directly into the rifle as it does to load a magazine (comparing same number of bullets). A magazine only adds the need to remove it and reinsert it.
For target shooting and hunting where there is no rush to reload there is no purpose to having a detachable mag IMO. The only exception would be high-capacity mags for culls where more than 3-4 shots would be done in quick succession, but that's fraction of shooters out there.
The Scout has a 10 shot detachable mag for example. How many hunters rattle through 10 shots with a bolt action and need to instantly change out for another 10? That'd be one big herd of really fat, really slow pigs...
One of the reasons I really like the Internal Mags is the easy of which to just drop a round in and close the bolt, I quite often use them like that when spotlighting and it works well from a safety point of view and even if I do fully load the mag and then forget to reload I can just quickly drop one in the port, close the bolt and take the shot, with the DBM setups you usually have to drop the mag out, load then reinsert and cycle the bolt and well the bastards gone by then You know what I mean. and I don't even have to lift my head of the stock to do it either,
You keep talking about having to load the mag all the time Scott not true with the tikka !!!Just let the plastic tongue on the mag hang out and you can top load just as quick as any floor plate rifle!!!
For some reason I though they had issues with being able to do that? I'm sure that was a bug bear with some who used them at the range, I think they even made a single load ramp for em? (confused look on face)