was thinking you guys might like this

[wrenchman]

ugb25 xcel i was thinking you guys might get it it only holds 2 rounds

[sandgroperbill]

Yeah, but it looks like a semi-auto. That means it can fire off 50 bullets in 4 seconds from those 2 shotgun shells with an effective range of 50km


and that's before you attach a magazine clip tube.

Plus, it's new deadly dangerous technology designed to get around our legislation

[AusTac]

Would be legal for those with shoulder/hand injuries for clays

[<<Genesis93>>]

Does it come with a 300 round drum magazine clip weapon bullet?

[Chronos]

Looks good. I'd be interested to know if as it only holds two rounds it's essentially the same as a SXS or O/U if it could be worked into out system

Chronos

[<<Genesis93>>]

I recall Beretta tried to get a 2 round semi approved some time ago under cat A?? but got knocked on the head.... so under cat C it could be supplied, but you'd just go a full mag version...

[adam]

I recall Beretta tried to get a 2 round semi approved some time ago under cat A?? but got knocked on the head....

.... because......?

Yeah, but it looks like a semi-auto. That means it can fire off 50 bullets in 4 seconds from those 2 shotgun shells with an effective range of 50km


and that's before you attach a magazine clip tube.

Plus, it's new deadly dangerous technology designed to get around our legislation

Aahhh - of course... that level of reasoning.

Once again just goes to emphasize that those making the decisions really are clueless when it comes to firearms - or bow down to the lefty emotional cries more than basic logic.

Far better to give someone with injuries access to CAT C and automatic firearms that hold more rounds than to give an option for a CAT-A license with something that's limited to 2 rounds...

[wrenchman]

video i seen it will only hold 2 it does not feed like a normal pump or semi auto and can not be made to hold more

[<<Genesis93>>]

I recall Beretta tried to get a 2 round semi approved some time ago under cat A?? but got knocked on the head....

.... because......?

Pretty much , just 'because'...it would still be a semi-auto, 2 rounds or not.

[MR. WINCHESTER]

Yeah, stupid beyond words.

A semi-auto, manufactured to ONLY hold 2 shells - 2 pulls of the trigger ... 2 bursts of pellets sent down range.

A SxS or U/O - 2 pulls of the trigger ... 2 bursts of pellets sent downrange.

The licencing for each, is totally different !

[adam]

Because a 2 shell semi-auto is so much faster and more powerful than a double barrel shotgun....

[MR. WINCHESTER]

Does anyone have Samantha or David's number ?

( Would be an fascinating conversation )

[<<Genesis93>>]

Yeah, stupid beyond words.

A semi-auto, manufactured to ONLY hold 2 shells - 2 pulls of the trigger ... 2 bursts of pellets sent down range.

A SxS or U/O - 2 pulls of the trigger ... 2 bursts of pellets sent downrange.

The licencing for each, is totally different !

Nothing is faster than 2 trigger 2 barrel.... ejectors... reload . Just dont let on else they'll recategorise doubles to cat c...

[Chickenhawk]

I'd be interested to know if as it only holds two rounds it's essentially the same as a SXS or O/U if it could be worked into out system

Yeah but saying it's the same is using logic.

What're the chances of FAR adopting that when it comes times to classify it?