AusTac wrote:
My .22 is plastic but lithgow do a good stock
AusTac wrote:Oh god its started.. :p
AusTac wrote:Oh god its started.. :p
oldmateadz wrote:I'll be buying my first rifle soon. And I'm looking at the Ruger American in the .22LR.
It's the polymer one, and I was just wondering if anyone had any opinions (advantages/disadvantages) between wood and plastic framed rifles?
oldmateadz wrote:AusTac wrote:Oh god its started.. :p
I was waiting for it haha
bladeracer wrote:
I have the American Rimfire Compact.
I like the rifle but I've fired maybe thirty different types of ammo through it and it really struggles to shoot under about 2MoA even with match ammo. I don't know if that's just mine or indicative of them all but I wasn't expecting a tack driver.
Supaduke wrote:Realistically, the only advantage of timber over modern polymers is looks, that's it, period. From a technical standpoint wood is not better than polymer. Yes some cheaper plastic stocks can be a bit floppy, but a good quality polymer/composite stock is better than timber. Timber is however, warm and feels nice, and some nice figure in the wood is beautiful. Can't say I've ever seen a beautiful plastic stock.
bigfellascott wrote:Supaduke wrote:
If you think you are going to be bashing through the scrub or are hard on equipment then the plastic would be better suited, if you are like me and look after your kit and don't treat it like crap then timber is fine, never had an issue with any of my timber stocks in the 40yrs of shooting and owning them so can't see that changing all of a sudden, mind you I don't go hunting in pissing down rain conditions or other weather extremes for that matter, occasionally get out when it's snowing but not often as I'd rather stay warm and wait for the weather to clear before I venture out
oldmateadz wrote:bladeracer wrote:
I have the American Rimfire Compact.
I like the rifle but I've fired maybe thirty different types of ammo through it and it really struggles to shoot under about 2MoA even with match ammo. I don't know if that's just mine or indicative of them all but I wasn't expecting a tack driver.
The shorter barrel might have something to do with perhaps?
Also, what made you go with the compact over the standard model mate?
oldmateadz wrote:I'm actually quite anal about all of my belongings, I like everything to be pristine... so the rifle I choose, be it plastic or wood, will get treated like a queen
I guess I'm steering more towards a plastic one is because have more of a "modern" look and feel. Opposed to wood being more classic. But thats just my opinion.
I have seen some extremely nice laminate ones too.
bladeracer wrote:I can certainly appreciate a beautiful firearm, but it's no good to me if I'm afraid to take it out in the rain, or fall into a creek with it, or bash it against a rock hidden in the grass
oldmateadz wrote:bladeracer wrote:I can certainly appreciate a beautiful firearm, but it's no good to me if I'm afraid to take it out in the rain, or fall into a creek with it, or bash it against a rock hidden in the grass
I definitely won't be afraid to take it out, but it will be my first rifle... so like anything new and exciting, I'll be cleaning it and treating it like a princess until I get over it and buy another one haha. Then the second one will become the princess
oldmateadz wrote:bigfellascott wrote:Supaduke wrote:
If you think you are going to be bashing through the scrub or are hard on equipment then the plastic would be better suited, if you are like me and look after your kit and don't treat it like crap then timber is fine, never had an issue with any of my timber stocks in the 40yrs of shooting and owning them so can't see that changing all of a sudden, mind you I don't go hunting in pissing down rain conditions or other weather extremes for that matter, occasionally get out when it's snowing but not often as I'd rather stay warm and wait for the weather to clear before I venture out
I'm actually quite anal about all of my belongings, I like everything to be pristine... so the rifle I choose, be it plastic or wood, will get treated like a queen
I guess I'm steering more towards a plastic one is because have more of a "modern" look and feel. Opposed to wood being more classic. But thats just my opinion.
I have seen some extremely nice laminate ones too.
on_one_wheel wrote:I'm a big fan of wooden rifle stocks.
Wood will scratch and dent but I like the feel, weight, rigidity and ballance of it.
I have one rifle in synthetic, a Remington 700 which is not exactly a cheap rifle and that stock is quite flimsy.
As mentioned earlier, plastic has it's advantages , it won't swell and change shape when wet or during times of high humidity which is good for maintaining accuracy.
It won't dent or scratch easily.
The lack of rigidity in a plastic stock is not a concern with .22 hunting rifles.
on_one_wheel wrote:I'm a big fan of wooden rifle stocks.
Gwion wrote:I personally feel that any time a stock is flexible enough that the fore-end can possibly contact the barrel when using a rest or bi-pod, it is going to effect accuracy; no matter what chambering the rifle is in.
The key word to me, here, is quality. Quality doesn't always equal expense but often the two correlate, particularly with synthetic stocks. A rifle in a cheap, flexy stock is going to prove more difficult to get shooting well than a rifle in a cheap timber stock. As mentioned earlier, the timber stocks are easier to bed, easier to sand/scrape/cut away material where needed than a synthetic stock. I would buy a good quality synthetic stock of quality polymer or composite construction but i would never again buy a rifle with a cheap synthetic stock.
What ever their other possible faults may be, i thing the Lithgow CO101 stocks are good quality from what i have seen. Also the Browning t-bolt stocks are good and sturdy; if we are just talking rimfires to begin with.
GLS_1956 wrote:who does not appreciate the look of a piece of well figured walnut?
I'm thinking that in the future I would like to check out a laminated stock. The heft and feel of wood but with the stability associated with synthetics.