AusTac wrote:What do we all reckon?
It's a constant battle with my .303 to keep them in working order, so i'm seriously considering trading them, along with all my surplus and tools for a decent 308.. a bit of safe clean out that i'll probably regreat one day..
Those are the two that appeal at the moment probably the lithgow more than the ruger especially with the price tag...
AusTac wrote:What do we all reckon?
It's a constant battle with my .303 to keep them in working order, so i'm seriously considering trading them, along with all my surplus and tools for a decent 308.. a bit of safe clean out that i'll probably regreat one day..
Those are the two that appeal at the moment probably the lithgow more than the ruger especially with the price tag...
MR. WINCHESTER wrote:Fark you blokes ....
Just buy a Winchester, then RELAX !
MR. WINCHESTER wrote:To Super ...
F**k You !
Supaduke wrote:MR. WINCHESTER wrote:To Super ...
F**k You !
No thanks, you're just like your bike, fat and slow.
bigfellascott wrote:Supaduke wrote:MR. WINCHESTER wrote:To Super ...
F**k You !
No thanks, you're just like your bike, fat and slow.
bloody brilliant comeback,
MR. WINCHESTER wrote:But .... Way cooler than any wog bike kickin about !
MR. WINCHESTER wrote:New Harleys are like new Winchesters .....
Way better than the old s**t !
gunnnie wrote:As to the comment "don't know why it needs to have a folding stock" - look at the design & you'll understand why.
bladeracer wrote:I still don't see any advantage for a folding stock on a long-range precision rifle.
Rakk wrote:bladeracer wrote:I still don't see any advantage for a folding stock on a long-range precision rifle.
For the Tacticool crowd to feel like "snipers".