Something a bit smaller for a change...

Bolt action rifles, lever action, pump action, self loading rifles and other miscellaneous longarms.

Something a bit smaller for a change...

Post by Homer » 18 Dec 2016, 7:13 pm

G'Day Fella's,

FYI, here is a post I placed on the Nosler forum, about the new Howa model 1500 Mini action, in 7.62x39.
https://forum.nosler.com/viewtopic.php? ... 16#p374316

I hope this may be of some assistance

Merry Christmas
Homer
Homer
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 340
Australian Capital Territory

Re: Something a bit smaller for a change...

Post by Homer » 09 Jan 2017, 9:15 am

G'Day Fella's,

Finally got a scope on this little rifle.
DSCN1784.JPG
DSCN1784.JPG (521.14 KiB) Viewed 6359 times


and shot some (50 meter) groups.
DSCN1786.JPG
DSCN1786.JPG (428.24 KiB) Viewed 6359 times

DSCN1788.JPG
DSCN1788.JPG (385.97 KiB) Viewed 6359 times


I think the Howa Mini is a keeper and Homer is a Happy Lad!

Doh!
Homer
Homer
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 340
Australian Capital Territory

Re: Something a bit smaller for a change...

Post by in2anity » 09 Jan 2017, 10:25 am

This calibre in this exact rifle really interests me - you have an insane amount of options considering its a 30 cal and the smaller case size means it's ideal for reduced loads. Whats the twist rate on this exact rifle?
At what point does lack of maintenance become patina?
User avatar
in2anity
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 3057
New South Wales

Re: Something a bit smaller for a change...

Post by bladeracer » 09 Jan 2017, 6:04 pm

in2anity wrote:This calibre in this exact rifle really interests me - you have an insane amount of options considering its a 30 cal and the smaller case size means it's ideal for reduced loads. Whats the twist rate on this exact rifle?



Actually, 7.62x39 doesn't use .308 bullets so options are fairly limited, at least that's my understanding of it.
In my opinion, 300BLK is a better choice if you aren't willing to simply load down .308.
Practice Strict Gun Control - Precision Counts!
User avatar
bladeracer
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 12691
Victoria

Re: Something a bit smaller for a change...

Post by in2anity » 09 Jan 2017, 8:08 pm

bladeracer wrote:
in2anity wrote:This calibre in this exact rifle really interests me - you have an insane amount of options considering its a 30 cal and the smaller case size means it's ideal for reduced loads. Whats the twist rate on this exact rifle?



Actually, 7.62x39 doesn't use .308 bullets so options are fairly limited, at least that's my understanding of it.
In my opinion, 300BLK is a better choice if you aren't willing to simply load down .308.


<EDIT> ; tight twist :huh: - the bullet diameter could be close depends on the actual bore size of the howa. It's just like a 30/30 can shoot spitzers (so long as you don't load more than one in the mag :thumbsup: ). I mean I can't claim that I've done it - but google it dude. I'd try lead through your rifle tbh - gas checked slightly oversized RN 308 lead over Trail Boss should work well with a 1:10, and very economical and fun for plinking, if not a mid burn like 2207 or 2206. Maybe I'm wrong though :unknown: that's why I asked
Last edited by in2anity on 10 Jan 2017, 6:27 am, edited 3 times in total.
At what point does lack of maintenance become patina?
User avatar
in2anity
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 3057
New South Wales

Re: Something a bit smaller for a change...

Post by bladeracer » 09 Jan 2017, 8:18 pm

in2anity wrote:Umm the cartridge can use any 308 projectile from 110 to 220 man; tight twist :huh: - the bullet diameter is the same. It's just like a 30/30 can shoot spitzers (so long as you don't load more than one in the mag :thumbsup: ). I mean I can't claim that I've done it - but google it dude. I'd try lead through your rifle tbh - gas checked RN 308 lead over Trail Boss should work well with a 1:10, and very economical and fun for plinking, if not a mid burn like 2207 or 2206. Maybe I'm wrong though :unknown: that's why I asked



I'm sure you can load .308 bullets into it but do they work as well as the correct diameter bullets?
Practice Strict Gun Control - Precision Counts!
User avatar
bladeracer
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 12691
Victoria

Re: Something a bit smaller for a change...

Post by brett1868 » 09 Jan 2017, 8:19 pm

in2anity wrote:
bladeracer wrote:
in2anity wrote:This calibre in this exact rifle really interests me - you have an insane amount of options considering its a 30 cal and the smaller case size means it's ideal for reduced loads. Whats the twist rate on this exact rifle?



Actually, 7.62x39 doesn't use .308 bullets so options are fairly limited, at least that's my understanding of it.
In my opinion, 300BLK is a better choice if you aren't willing to simply load down .308.


Umm the cartridge can use any 308 projectile from 110 to 200 man :huh: - the bullet diameter is the same. It's just like a 30/30 can shoot spitzers (so long as you don't load more than one in the mag :thumbsup: ). I mean I can't claim that I've done it - but google it dude. I'd try lead through your rifle tbh - gas checked RN 308 lead over Trail Boss should work well with a 1:10 and very economical for plinking, if not a mid burn like 2207 or 2206. Maybe I'm wrong though :unknown:


According to the ADI site it'll take a .310", .311" & .312" projectile like the good old 303whereas the usual 30Cal is .308". Plenty guys running .308" projectiles through the .303" so it should be similar with the 7.62x39. Pity about the timing though as I used to buy spam cans of Russian ammo to feed my SKS & SKK.
How's my posting?
Complaints, Concerns - 13 11 14
User avatar
brett1868
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 3017
New South Wales

Re: Something a bit smaller for a change...

Post by bladeracer » 09 Jan 2017, 8:19 pm

Actually, I just had a bit of a Google, and it seems some modern manufacturers when chambering for 7.62x39mm are using a .309" bore. That would probably work okay with .308" bullets.
Practice Strict Gun Control - Precision Counts!
User avatar
bladeracer
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 12691
Victoria

Re: Something a bit smaller for a change...

Post by in2anity » 09 Jan 2017, 8:20 pm

bladeracer wrote:
in2anity wrote:Umm the cartridge can use any 308 projectile from 110 to 220 man; tight twist :huh: - the bullet diameter is the same. It's just like a 30/30 can shoot spitzers (so long as you don't load more than one in the mag :thumbsup: ). I mean I can't claim that I've done it - but google it dude. I'd try lead through your rifle tbh - gas checked RN 308 lead over Trail Boss should work well with a 1:10, and very economical and fun for plinking, if not a mid burn like 2207 or 2206. Maybe I'm wrong though :unknown: that's why I asked



I'm sure you can load .308 bullets into it but do they work as well as the correct diameter bullets?


<EDIT> - misread OP as 7.62 x 35; 308 may fail to stabilise in 7.62 x 39; one needs to test the concerned projectile.
Last edited by in2anity on 10 Jan 2017, 6:18 am, edited 1 time in total.
At what point does lack of maintenance become patina?
User avatar
in2anity
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 3057
New South Wales

Re: Something a bit smaller for a change...

Post by in2anity » 09 Jan 2017, 8:25 pm

bladeracer wrote:Actually, I just had a bit of a Google, and it seems some modern manufacturers when chambering for 7.62x39mm are using a .309" bore. That would probably work okay with .308" bullets.


I think it would vary from manufacturer to manufacturer - the official spec for 30/30 is .308, but for example marlins are .309" - they will shoot .308" bullets though
Last edited by in2anity on 10 Jan 2017, 6:19 am, edited 1 time in total.
At what point does lack of maintenance become patina?
User avatar
in2anity
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 3057
New South Wales

Re: Something a bit smaller for a change...

Post by bladeracer » 09 Jan 2017, 8:28 pm

brett1868 wrote:According to the ADI site it'll take a .310", .311" & .312" projectile like the good old 303whereas the usual 30Cal is .308". Plenty guys running .308" projectiles through the .303" so it should be similar with the 7.62x39. Pity about the timing though as I used to buy spam cans of Russian ammo to feed my SKS & SKK.



I haven't had success with .308 bullets in my .303.
Maybe a long, blunt bullet might work though.

.264" spitzer bullets don't work in my .268" Carcano at all, but the .264" Hornady 160gn RN does fatten up enough to build pressure.
Last edited by bladeracer on 09 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Practice Strict Gun Control - Precision Counts!
User avatar
bladeracer
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 12691
Victoria

Re: Something a bit smaller for a change...

Post by bladeracer » 09 Jan 2017, 8:29 pm

in2anity wrote:I think it would vary from manufacturer to manufacturer - the official spec is .308, same as 308W and 30/30, but for example marlins are .309" - they always shoot .308" bullets though



The official spec for the 7.62x39mm bullet and barrel is .310" or .311", not .308".
Practice Strict Gun Control - Precision Counts!
User avatar
bladeracer
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 12691
Victoria

Re: Something a bit smaller for a change...

Post by bladeracer » 09 Jan 2017, 8:30 pm

in2anity wrote:The diameter is the same 0.308 inch (7.8mm) :thumbsup: you should get into handloading (if you're not already) it's a lot of fun


No it isn't.
.308 is 0.308" diameter.
7.62x39mm is 0.310"-ish.


I started handloading in '83 with my first centrefire rifle.
Practice Strict Gun Control - Precision Counts!
User avatar
bladeracer
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 12691
Victoria

Re: Something a bit smaller for a change...

Post by in2anity » 09 Jan 2017, 8:31 pm

bladeracer wrote:
brett1868 wrote:According to the ADI site it'll take a .310", .311" & .312" projectile like the good old 303whereas the usual 30Cal is .308". Plenty guys running .308" projectiles through the .303" so it should be similar with the 7.62x39. Pity about the timing though as I used to buy spam cans of Russian ammo to feed my SKS & SKK.



I haven't had success with .308 bullets in my .303.
Maybe a long, blunt bullet might work though.

.264" spitzer bullets don't work in my Carcano at all, but the .264" Hornady 160gn RN does fatten up enough to build pressure.


Yes because the 303 is officially 4 thou bigger than 308 - actual 303 barrels may even be 5 or 6 :? You need at least a .311 for proper obturation in a 303
Last edited by in2anity on 09 Jan 2017, 8:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
At what point does lack of maintenance become patina?
User avatar
in2anity
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 3057
New South Wales

Re: Something a bit smaller for a change...

Post by bladeracer » 09 Jan 2017, 8:32 pm

I just noticed :-)
Go back to photos in the first post and note the bullet diameters Homer is using - .309" and .310".
Practice Strict Gun Control - Precision Counts!
User avatar
bladeracer
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 12691
Victoria

Re: Something a bit smaller for a change...

Post by bladeracer » 09 Jan 2017, 8:34 pm

in2anity wrote:Yes because the 303 is officially 4 thou bigger than 308 - actual 303 barrels may even be 5 or 6 :? You need at least a .311 for obturation in a 303


That's almost correct, .303 is usually specified at .3105" - mine is .311". And it's the same situation for 7.62x54R, and almost the same for 7.62x39mm (official bore diameter for the 7.62x39mm seems to vary a bit, but not as tight as .308").
Practice Strict Gun Control - Precision Counts!
User avatar
bladeracer
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 12691
Victoria

Re: Something a bit smaller for a change...

Post by in2anity » 09 Jan 2017, 8:44 pm

bladeracer wrote:
in2anity wrote:Yes because the 303 is officially 4 thou bigger than 308 - actual 303 barrels may even be 5 or 6 :? You need at least a .311 for obturation in a 303


That's almost correct, .303 is usually specified at .3105" - mine is .311". And it's the same situation for 7.62x54R, and almost the same for 7.62x39mm (official bore diameter for the 7.62x39mm seems to vary a bit, but not as tight as .308").


Lol righto stat-man I didn't realize you were the almighty technicality judge https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/.303_British - I say it varies between rifles. Anyway I'm not here to argue about 303s; we're side tracked - point is the 300 BO will shoot most 308 projectiles fine. I really want a nice 1:10 HB BO to plink lead with!!
At what point does lack of maintenance become patina?
User avatar
in2anity
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 3057
New South Wales

Re: Something a bit smaller for a change...

Post by in2anity » 09 Jan 2017, 8:52 pm

bladeracer wrote:
in2anity wrote:I think it would vary from manufacturer to manufacturer - the official spec is .308, same as 308W and 30/30, but for example marlins are .309" - they always shoot .308" bullets though



The official spec for the 7.62x39mm bullet and barrel is .310" or .311", not .308".


Wait, are we talking Russian or 7.62 x 35 (300 BO)? If it's Russian x 39 indeed you are correct - i was thinking 300 BO. What is homers howa?
Last edited by in2anity on 10 Jan 2017, 6:21 am, edited 1 time in total.
At what point does lack of maintenance become patina?
User avatar
in2anity
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 3057
New South Wales

Re: Something a bit smaller for a change...

Post by bladeracer » 09 Jan 2017, 8:56 pm

in2anity wrote:Lol righto stat-man I didn't realize you were the almighty technicality judge https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/.303_British - I say it varies between rifles. Anyway I'm not here to argue about 303s; we're side tracked - point is the 300 BO will shoot most 308 projectiles fine. I really want a nice 1:10 HB BO to plink lead with!!


Stat-man????

How did 300BLK come into a discussion about a Howa in 7.62x39mm?

Yes, 300BLK is .308", but you stated "This calibre in this exact rifle really interests me - you have an insane amount of options considering its a 30 cal and the smaller case size means it's ideal for reduced loads. Whats the twist rate on this exact rifle?" - regarding a Howa rifle in 7.62x39mm...or the numerous times I referred specifically to 7.62x39mm...
Last edited by bladeracer on 09 Jan 2017, 8:57 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Practice Strict Gun Control - Precision Counts!
User avatar
bladeracer
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 12691
Victoria

Re: Something a bit smaller for a change...

Post by in2anity » 09 Jan 2017, 8:57 pm

bladeracer wrote:I just noticed :-)
Go back to photos in the first post and note the bullet diameters Homer is using - .309" and .310".


Well damn it can handle the 309! I wonder what the official diameter of that barrel is!
At what point does lack of maintenance become patina?
User avatar
in2anity
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 3057
New South Wales

Re: Something a bit smaller for a change...

Post by bladeracer » 09 Jan 2017, 8:58 pm

in2anity wrote:Well damn it can handle the 309! I wonder what the official diameter of that barrel is!


Also note - it is chambered in 7.62x39mm not 300BLK.
Practice Strict Gun Control - Precision Counts!
User avatar
bladeracer
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 12691
Victoria

Re: Something a bit smaller for a change...

Post by in2anity » 09 Jan 2017, 8:59 pm

bladeracer wrote:
in2anity wrote:Lol righto stat-man I didn't realize you were the almighty technicality judge https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/.303_British - I say it varies between rifles. Anyway I'm not here to argue about 303s; we're side tracked - point is the 300 BO will shoot most 308 projectiles fine. I really want a nice 1:10 HB BO to plink lead with!!


Stat-man????

How did 300BLK come into a discussion about a Howa in 7.62x39mm?

Yes, 300BLK is .308", but you stated "This calibre in this exact rifle really interests me - you have an insane amount of options considering its a 30 cal and the smaller case size means it's ideal for reduced loads. Whats the twist rate on this exact rifle?" - regarding a Howa rifle in 7.62x39mm...or the numerous times I referred specifically to 7.62x39mm...


Sorry was confused between the two - my bad. The whole time I was imagining 300 BO for some reason.
At what point does lack of maintenance become patina?
User avatar
in2anity
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 3057
New South Wales

Re: Something a bit smaller for a change...

Post by bladeracer » 09 Jan 2017, 9:03 pm

in2anity wrote:Sorry was confused between the two - my bad. The whole time I was imagining 300 BO for some reason.


No worries, at least your side of the discussion makes sense in that light :-)
Practice Strict Gun Control - Precision Counts!
User avatar
bladeracer
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 12691
Victoria

Re: Something a bit smaller for a change...

Post by in2anity » 09 Jan 2017, 9:20 pm

bladeracer wrote:
in2anity wrote:Sorry was confused between the two - my bad. The whole time I was imagining 300 BO for some reason.


No worries, at least your side of the discussion makes sense in that light :-)


Yeah I read OP as 7.62x35 (aka 300 BO) instead of x39. That changes things completely; I'm not nearly as interested in the rifle now :( I need to go back and strike through my posts as a disclaimer. Sorry Homer, ignore my rambling. Although interestingly it did stabilize a 309"... maybe strangely there is some truth to running 308s through it.
At what point does lack of maintenance become patina?
User avatar
in2anity
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 3057
New South Wales

Re: Something a bit smaller for a change...

Post by bladeracer » 09 Jan 2017, 9:26 pm

in2anity wrote:Yeah I read OP as 7.62x35 (aka 300 BO) instead of x39. That changes things completely; I'm not nearly as interested in the rifle now :( I need to go back and strike through my posts as a disclaimer. Sorry Homer, ignore my rambling. Although interestingly it did stabilize a 309"... maybe strangely there is some truth to running 308s through it.



I read that Ruger did the Mini-30 with a tighter bore to allow Americans to use .308" bullets, and that was a fair while ago.
I'd also be interested to know if the Howa is using a tighter-than-spec bore diameter for similar reasons.
Practice Strict Gun Control - Precision Counts!
User avatar
bladeracer
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 12691
Victoria

Re: Something a bit smaller for a change...

Post by in2anity » 13 Jan 2017, 7:33 am

Here you go straight from the horse's mouth:

(for Howa rifles)
7.62 x 39:
land to land = 0.300
groove to groove = 0.311"
308 win:
land to land = 0.300"
groove to groove = 0.308"

What does this mean? In short you are ok to use .30cal projectiles with the only variance you’ll get will be velocity. No guarantee when it comes accuracy however.
Last edited by in2anity on 01 Feb 2017, 12:02 pm, edited 2 times in total.
At what point does lack of maintenance become patina?
User avatar
in2anity
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 3057
New South Wales

Re: Something a bit smaller for a change...

Post by Oldbloke » 13 Jan 2017, 7:59 am

IMHO. You would be better off buying a 308, or other more common calibre and down load. Less common calibres are often problematic when it comes to availability and cost.

Popular calibres are popular for a reason.
The greatest invention in the history of man is beer.
https://youtu.be/2v3QrUvYj-Y
Member. SFFP, Shooters Union.
SSAA, the powerful gun lobby. :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Hunt safe.
User avatar
Oldbloke
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 11311
Victoria

Re: Something a bit smaller for a change...

Post by in2anity » 13 Jan 2017, 8:28 am

Oldbloke wrote:IMHO. You would be better off buying a 308, or other more common calibre and down load. Less common calibres are often problematic when it comes to availability and cost.

Popular calibres are popular for a reason.


Agreed. If only Howa offered 300blk... I just like the idea of a smaller case matching reduced loads (which I predominantly shoot); I'm not a big fan of case filler.
At what point does lack of maintenance become patina?
User avatar
in2anity
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 3057
New South Wales

Re: Something a bit smaller for a change...

Post by Gwion » 13 Jan 2017, 8:41 am

Get a Howa mini and have it rebarrelled to 300blk.
User avatar
Gwion
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3978
-

Re: Something a bit smaller for a change...

Post by in2anity » 13 Jan 2017, 8:52 am

Gwion wrote:Get a Howa mini and have it rebarrelled to 300blk.


Would you need to have the action/magazine altered to match 300blk? What would be the best calibre + Howa gun to start with if you wanted to do this?
Last edited by in2anity on 13 Jan 2017, 8:55 am, edited 2 times in total.
At what point does lack of maintenance become patina?
User avatar
in2anity
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 3057
New South Wales

Next

Back to top
 
Return to Centerfire rifles