.222 v .223

[in2anity]

All I have is a 22 and a highly tuned 30/30. I shoot lead through them both, and both are extremely accurate. With good shot placement I can tick every (Aussie) box with these two, and they are both very cheap to run (and practice with). Totally agree with sticking to a couple of rifles and learn their trajectories like the back of your hand.

[deye243]

just remember that pill weight don't mean squat it's pill construction that counts especially if you are going for the boiler room .

[bigfellascott]

just remember that pill weight don't mean squat it's pill construction that counts especially if you are going for the boiler room .

Bloody oath D, it can certainly make the difference between success and failure at times.

[Oldbloke]

just remember that pill weight don't mean squat it's pill construction that counts especially if you are going for the boiler room .

Bloody oath D, it can certainly make the difference between success and failure at times.

And how it reacts is effected by the speed of the projectile on impact and what it hits, bone or soft flesh. The reality is that there are a lot of variabilities.

[Gwion]

Yep. I made up a trail boss load for a friend who wanted something with more whack than a 22lr but quieter than a full load 223rem so it didn't spook game or his stock as much. We did full load development and got his rifle zeroed at 100m for the round. I told him it is 120m max because it will really drop like a stone after that. It's a funny round when leaving the muzzle at around 1800fps if gives you a point and shoot MPBR into 2" from about 40m to 100 and loses about an inch out to 110m. After that it is losing velocity very quickly, making hold over for range a stupid guessing game. He shot something at 150-180m (his guesstimating). He showed me the Nosler Ballitic Tip 55gn bullet that he recovered. It was a bit bent but had entirely failed to expand or fragment. He said that closer shots had performed exactly as intended.

I reminded him that the load is only designed to shoot out to 120m MAX and that after 110ish it is starting to shed speed at an alarming rate.

If you don't understand the design parameters of your ammo and use it outside these boundries, you are asking for some nasty surprises! Just because you can hit something at a given range, doesn't mean you should!

[happyhunter]

.

[Garth]

I've always loved 222 but was burned out cost more to fix it was a Schultz 1530.so brought steyr 223 now I love 223. I used to bag this cal but am converted dam good cal is the 223 I shoot 70gn projectiles out of it now Iam a 223 man all the way

[bigfellascott]

I've got both cals and don't really use either of them since I got the 204 - I find it better than both for what I use it for (shooting foxes and rabbits) just flatter shooting and tends to find the target more often than not without any real stuffing around (point and shoot) which is perfect for my needs.

The 222 was my first CF and it was a reliable cal for it's day and age and still is, the 223's just the magnum version if you will with a little more range and better choice of heaver projectiles (which most seem more target orientated than for hunting purposes as far as I can tell) not that that matter so much if you put the projectile in the right spot.

They are all good cals, pick one and use it well and it will do the job fine.

[happyhunter]

.

[bigfellascott]

I use the 222 when I know shots are going to be under 200 yards. Further than that I'll take the 204. The 222 has a very short barrel and it's a light rifle compared to my 204 which is heavy and has a 24" barrel. When the scrub is thick or I'm climbing the rocks the 222 makes life easier, but a Howa mini in 204 with a 20" barrel might change that

Irony is a lot of people think the 223 is better than 222 cos fast twist versions can shoot heavy bullets, but the 204 shoots lighter bullets and for up to fox size game is a better choice than either and it makes a great roo gun too.

Yeah can't say I really ever bother with the 223, much prefer the 222 or 204 or my 250 if I'm expecting to shoot something half decent sized - now I have the 308 it probably won't see much action for that sort of thing either

I reckon I could get away with a 22, 12g, 204 and the 308 for all my shooting needs - the rest is just cos I want em really (not that that's a bad thing) I just find I stick to what works for me and those are doing the job fine for now but I must say I do like the boooom of the 250 and the noise it makes when that projectile hits home (she hits things hard and never any doubt as to whether you hit something or not)

[Blackened]

Moderator time.

I've deleted all the argumentative posts.

Clearly there are some opinions here which aren't going to be changed.

People have said their piece, consider it finished.

Any who wish to continue the discussion calmly are welcome to do so.

Others would do well to move on to other topics.