Tikka T3 CTR vs Lithgow LA102 Crossover

Bolt action rifles, lever action, pump action, self loading rifles and other miscellaneous longarms.

Re: Tikka T3 CTR vs Lithgow LA102 Crossover

Post by bigfellascott » 20 Sep 2017, 8:49 pm

Gwion wrote:
bigfellascott wrote:
Gwion wrote:
southwest shooter wrote:Just buy a howa ffs !
Cheap , well made and accurate .


You can get a nice timber stock for it too.

Still, given the cash and a choice between Lithgow & Howa, I'd go the Lithy. Howa is a good basic rifle but 2v3 locking lugs and the Howa's flimsy bolt stop lose the argument for me, also the fit & finish on the Lithgow is definitely a cut above the Howa.

If I was on a budget is buy another Howa, as I have before but funds permitting I'd get a Lithgow.


So what's the advantage over a 2 lug v 3 lug? can't say I've even looked at the bolt stop on any of my Howas - I assume they are all still working as expected since the bolts haven't come out of any of em without me pressing the bolt release. :D


The bolt stop on Howas are pinned on with the tiniest of screws and is known to break, as it has on mine.

Three locking lugs allow for a shorter bolt throw angle and a more definite lock. It also allows for setting up a more concentric bolt face under battery when you action is trued. In other words a higher mechanical accuracy potential.


Thanks for that G, will any of that make any real meaningful difference in a hunting rifle or is it just another one of those sales gimmicks that is often portrayed as something special and a must have to be able to hunt better?
User avatar
bigfellascott
Lieutenant General
Lieutenant General
 
Posts: 5289
-

Re: Tikka T3 CTR vs Lithgow LA102 Crossover

Post by Gamerancher » 21 Sep 2017, 6:57 am

RoginaJack wrote:Hey Gamerancher - Weight limit for "hunter" class is 10.2kg or 9.25lb. But 10.2kg = 22.48lbs (1kg=2.204lbs) ?

Is that right?


Sorry, typo. Correct weight is 4.2kg, my bad. :oops:
User avatar
Gamerancher
Sergeant Major
Sergeant Major
 
Posts: 1596
New South Wales

Re: Tikka T3 CTR vs Lithgow LA102 Crossover

Post by simmo » 22 Sep 2017, 9:18 am

This is a timely and helpful thread so thanks for posting it.

I'm a long range target shooter predominantly and I'm thinking about a .223 for shorter range target stuff but interested in getting into whacking ferals. I see there isn't much difference in the Tikka varmints and Super varmints compared to a LA102?
The Tikka comes with a 1:8twist off the shelf and that is a major draw, does anyone know what the Lithgow comes with in terms of barrel contour and twist?
simmo
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 107
New South Wales

Re: Tikka T3 CTR vs Lithgow LA102 Crossover

Post by Hangfire » 22 Sep 2017, 12:44 pm

Hangfire
Private
Private
 
Posts: 52
New South Wales

Re: Tikka T3 CTR vs Lithgow LA102 Crossover

Post by Gwion » 22 Sep 2017, 3:23 pm

bigfellascott wrote:
Thanks for that G, will any of that make any real meaningful difference in a hunting rifle or is it just another one of those sales gimmicks that is often portrayed as something special and a must have to be able to hunt better?
[/quote][/quote]

If the screw on your bolt stop fails I can assure you it will make a big dint in your hunting trip.

As for the rest: the way I see it is if you have the budget for up to date engineering on your rifle, why not take advantage of it. The thread is, after all, about Tikka v Lithgow, not "best value for money gun".

Hell, if I had the cash I'd pay a lot more for a rifle than what a Tikka or Lithgow cost because I like the feel of well made, well designed and aesthetically pleasing equipment. Same reason I have rather pricey fishing gear.

I have cash flow issues with a large mortgage and limited income and developing business so I have a Howa. Yes, to works and is very accurate, especially since I got it trued up and rebarrelled, but it is a bit clunky and I am always wondering when that bolt release will fail again.

I have a number of fly rods in the same weight. One is a cheapy but decent rod with an $80 reel on it. One is a Sage with a nice reel on it that would cost well over $1000 to replace. They both do effectively the same thing and neither makes me a better fisherman but which do you think is nicer to use and which do you think gets used the most and which is just a back up for when z rodless friend wants to come for a fish?
User avatar
Gwion
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3978
-

Re: Tikka T3 CTR vs Lithgow LA102 Crossover

Post by bigfellascott » 22 Sep 2017, 4:09 pm

Gwion wrote:
bigfellascott wrote:
Thanks for that G, will any of that make any real meaningful difference in a hunting rifle or is it just another one of those sales gimmicks that is often portrayed as something special and a must have to be able to hunt better?
[/quote]

If the screw on your bolt stop fails I can assure you it will make a big dint in your hunting trip.

As for the rest: the way I see it is if you have the budget for up to date engineering on your rifle, why not take advantage of it. The thread is, after all, about Tikka v Lithgow, not "best value for money gun".

Hell, if I had the cash I'd pay a lot more for a rifle than what a Tikka or Lithgow cost because I like the feel of well made, well designed and aesthetically pleasing equipment. Same reason I have rather pricey fishing gear.

I have cash flow issues with a large mortgage and limited income and developing business so I have a Howa. Yes, to works and is very accurate, especially since I got it trued up and rebarrelled, but it is a bit clunky and I am always wondering when that bolt release will fail again.

I have a number of fly rods in the same weight. One is a cheapy but decent rod with an $80 reel on it. One is a Sage with a nice reel on it that would cost well over $1000 to replace. They both do effectively the same thing and neither makes me a better fisherman but which do you think is nicer to use and which do you think gets used the most and which is just a back up for when z rodless friend wants to come for a fish?
[/quote]

Yeah I had a Sako and sold it and bought a Tikka, the Sako was ok in some ways but didn't live up to the hype and for me it was just dead money sitting in the safe as I preferred to use my Howas to be honest (I know I'm weird) but it's the truth, I had absolutely no faith in the Sako what so ever, every time I used it I couldn't hit s**t with it and in the end that just wasn't going to cut the mustard with me so I flicked it and traded up to the Tikka, it too isn't anything special at this stage (not real flash accuracy wise) but I think that is down to the barrel touching in the channel so I've decided to remove the wood stock and I've got a Lam Tikka Stock sitting there to try out (the wood was too nice IMO to be bashing around the bush with anyway and it would Piss me off if I'd damaged it so the Lam Stock was the go for my needs, I also have one of the Plastikka stocks here to test out on it which is new but will try the Lam Stock first as I prefer those.

One thing I can say is I've never been worried about my Howa's not working, some are over 30yrs old and still function like the day I bought them, mind you I don't treat my gear roughly and look after it all well for the most part (not saying you treat your gear roughly by the way) for me fancy isn't something I worry about, it has to function and be reliable and able to get the job done, I don't fine any fascination or desire to own over priced gear especially when it comes to firearms as I've found the basic stuff does the job just fine and hasn't as yet ever let me down, unlike the expensive stuff which as left me feeling cold when it comes to it's performance in comparison to the cheaper stuff - one would rightly think that paying 2 or 3 times the prices for something would see that particular product superior in performance to the cheaper stuff but sadly that hasn't been the case at all, quite the opposite in fact and I know of a few people with Fancy Sakos and the like who have had to send them back as the barrels were stuffed straight from the factory, to me they are way over priced for what you really get and i think people are being charged a premium for the name these days, in days gone by yes they were superior in their performance and craftsmanship over the stuff back then but that gap has significantly closed now to the point where spending heaps doesn't see any real improvements in performance it just gets you a prettier bit of wood or shinier barrel type thing and trust me when I say there are plenty of unhappy Sako owners out there when it comes to that ejection problem they are know for, can't say I've ever had any such probs with the good ol reliable Howas of mine, they may not be as "refined" but they sure do shoot well and get the job done for peanuts which is right up my alley as I hate wasting good money on something only to find it doesn't live up to the advertising hype. :unknown:

I've got two mates who work in gun shops and even they say the same thing that the Sakos are way over priced when you compare the performance etc of the Tikkas - they just buy Tikkas as the extra $$ for a Sako doesn't really see any real tangible benefits performance wise compared to the Tikkas - each to their own of course and buy whatever floats ya boat :unknown:

Anyway G thanks again for the reply and happy shooting. :drinks:
User avatar
bigfellascott
Lieutenant General
Lieutenant General
 
Posts: 5289
-

Previous

Back to top
 
Return to Centerfire rifles