by Rod_outbak » 11 Mar 2018, 7:41 am
Gilmc,
My 2 cents...
Having started down a path (of wanting better distance capability) roughly 6 years ago, I firstly went .308(Rem 700 VSF), then 7mm-08(Tikka T3), and then picked up another .308 (Ruger PR).
Given you are looking at small/medium game, as well as wanting to do some long-range target shooting, I'd suggest a .260Rem or 6.5 Creedmoor.
You can form the cases for either from .243 or .308, so brass is readily available (especially if you reload yourself).
I have a bunch of long-distance shooting mates who come out and shoot ferals on our sheep station; a couple of times a year.
When they started their little band of brothers in 2011, they were mostly shooting .308 at the range.
Over time, they all started to gravitate towards the 6.5mm calibre for their range competitions.
Of the 5 of them, there are now 4 with 6.5mm calibre rifles, and the distances they are head-shooting ferals, is amazing to me.
One mate has a Tikka T3 in a MacMillan stock, which is way too heavy for walking, but reaches out a LONG way and touches furry animals with extreme force. When he is pokking ferals, he mostly uses 95Gn V-max projectiles, which are pretty nasty.
Both the .308 and the 7mm-08 are fantastic calibres, and I'd never consider getting rid of either. The 7mm-08 is a bit more limited in projectile availability for the lighter end of the range, but then I found the 120gn V-Max does pretty much everything I could ever want, so that's not really been a big issue.
My 7mm-08 (Tikka T3 Hunter Stainless Fluted) is very light, and I found the 7mm-08 recoil was getting to me, so I had a TrenTech 3-port brake fitted, and recoil is now like shooting a .223. Not people-friendly for the range, but has made that rifle a fantastic choice for walking/hunting.
One other sugggestion:- When I bought my Tikka T3, I went with the Hunter Stainless fluted. The wood stock turned out to be absolute crap; it seems to get dings in it just by someone looking at it. My mate gave me his Synthetic Varmint stock from his Tikka, and it's been fantastic. At the time, we were having all sorts of problems getting the groups down below 1.5 MOA on the T3. We swapped out the stock, and upgraded the scope, and it now seems to shoot about 0.75 MOA.
While I'm sure some additional tweaking could shrink that grouping even more, it's good enough for me...
Given my Ruger has the option of swapping a barrel, I am seriously considering re-barrelling it in one of the 6.5 calibres.
I like the Tikka; probably the most over the 3 rifles. However, it has required the most tweaking to get it to shoot as consistently as the Rem 700.
Additional thought is the .243win; Big enough to nail small(ish) deer, and responsible for an awful lot of smaller game around here over the years.
About the only area where the 6.5mm might serve you better, is they have better long-range report card (and a .243 does takes some beating in that regard!).
A Tikka T3X in .243 or .260 is probably going to put a smile on your face on a regular basis...
My 2 cents...
Cheers,
Rod.
---------------------
Sharing the extreme love with cats in Outback QLD