308W AR2208 BM8208

Reloading equipment, methods, load data, powder and projectile information.

308W AR2208 BM8208

Post by madang55 » 21 Oct 2018, 1:58 am

Is it just me or does AR2208 take up a lot more room than BM8208? I'm using the ADI book and for 110gn/165gn/200gn proj, the 2208 just takes up too much room in the case. How "compressed" can I go? I'm not fond of the idea of creating grenades in the chamber. There is a lot of feedback on other topics giving the 2208 the thumbs up, but 8208 gets a "also good" comment. I will probably only use 180gn proj as a max for for my purposes.
My wife knows me well.
The dog often reminds me of that
User avatar
madang55
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 368
Victoria

Re: 308W AR2208 BM8208

Post by bladeracer » 21 Oct 2018, 2:18 am

madang55 wrote:Is it just me or does AR2208 take up a lot more room than BM8208? I'm using the ADI book and for 110gn/165gn/200gn proj, the 2208 just takes up too much room in the case. How "compressed" can I go? I'm not fond of the idea of creating grenades in the chamber. There is a lot of feedback on other topics giving the 2208 the thumbs up, but 8208 gets a "also good" comment. I will probably only use 180gn proj as a max for for my purposes.


Compress it as much as it will allow - compressed is good.
Practice Strict Gun Control - Precision Counts!
User avatar
bladeracer
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 12676
Victoria

Re: 308W AR2208 BM8208

Post by bigrich » 21 Oct 2018, 11:50 am

You guys got any recipes for 150gn projectiles . I’m looking at using bench mark 2 and 2206h as I already have some . I’m going to get a sample of 2208 of a mate later on to try. Was looking at using hornady sst’s out of a 22” barrel. Cheers
User avatar
bigrich
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 4504
Queensland

Re: 308W AR2208 BM8208

Post by SCJ429 » 21 Oct 2018, 12:21 pm

You should be able to get 47 grains or even a bit more with a long drop tube and a bit of tapping with 2208. If you try 150 grain SST I have seen 47 grains of 2208 produce a SD of 9 and a ES of 17, which is not a bad hunting load.
SCJ429
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 3212
New South Wales

Re: 308W AR2208 BM8208

Post by madang55 » 21 Oct 2018, 2:49 pm

Haven't gone near 150gr Proj yet.
Have to get a long drop tube.
Are you sure compressed is good?
My wife knows me well.
The dog often reminds me of that
User avatar
madang55
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 368
Victoria

Re: 308W AR2208 BM8208

Post by bladeracer » 21 Oct 2018, 2:56 pm

madang55 wrote:Haven't gone near 150gr Proj yet.
Have to get a long drop tube.
Are you sure compressed is good?


Compressed is good with many powders, it makes a more consistent burn compared to having air in the case.
Some powders are not compressible - AR2217 is one I struggle with in .30-06, sometimes having to reduce the charges to be able to seat the bullets.
AR2206H I heap above the case mouth in the .204, and then seat the bullet on it.
Practice Strict Gun Control - Precision Counts!
User avatar
bladeracer
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 12676
Victoria

Re: 308W AR2208 BM8208

Post by madang55 » 21 Oct 2018, 3:01 pm

OK, (he says with trepidation)
My wife knows me well.
The dog often reminds me of that
User avatar
madang55
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 368
Victoria

Re: 308W AR2208 BM8208

Post by bladeracer » 21 Oct 2018, 3:07 pm

madang55 wrote:OK, (he says with trepidation)


I don't know if it's fact, but I have read that old .303 Cordite ammo was charged first as a straight-walled case, and then the neck formed around the Cordite strands - now that sounds like compression to me :-)
Practice Strict Gun Control - Precision Counts!
User avatar
bladeracer
Field Marshal
Field Marshal
 
Posts: 12676
Victoria

Re: 308W AR2208 BM8208

Post by bigrich » 21 Oct 2018, 3:56 pm

SCJ429 wrote:You should be able to get 47 grains or even a bit more with a long drop tube and a bit of tapping with 2208. If you try 150 grain SST I have seen 47 grains of 2208 produce a SD of 9 and a ES of 17, which is not a bad hunting load.


thanks for the advice, targeted game is primarily pigs and goats, with a bit of luck deer. the 165's are better ballistically, but i feel are overkill for these species. 2208 is supposed to be THE powder for 308 as well i beleive. opinions anyone :unknown: :thumbsup:
User avatar
bigrich
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 4504
Queensland

Re: 308W AR2208 BM8208

Post by SCJ429 » 21 Oct 2018, 4:27 pm

The ideal condition is where the powder sits right at the base of the projectile, you can settle the powder better with drop tubes and vibrating the case. Heavily compressed loads are not conducive to accuracy, the powder pushes the bullet back out of the case and your seating depth is all over the place. If you cannot get the velocity you are after you can try another powder.
SCJ429
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 3212
New South Wales

Re: 308W AR2208 BM8208

Post by SCJ429 » 21 Oct 2018, 4:39 pm

I think that 2208 isn't a bad choice for all weight of bullets except for the lightest bullets. Other powders do quite well but in most cases cannot eclipse the performance of 2208. Some Winchester ball powders can do quite well depending on your application.
SCJ429
Lieutenant Colonel
Lieutenant Colonel
 
Posts: 3212
New South Wales

Re: 308W AR2208 BM8208

Post by duncan61 » 21 Oct 2018, 6:14 pm

I purchased 4kg of 2208 a while back and load.222 .243 and the 100gn pills in my 7mm.none are compressed and they all burn clean some loads are compressed in the loading data so I am sure it is fine.an experienced shooter at the range when I was new said I could fill my .222 to the top and compress the load and I thought he was mad however even a compressed .222 is not as much powder as a .223
.22 winchester .22hornet .222 .243 7mm rem mag cbc 12g
User avatar
duncan61
Officer Cadet
Officer Cadet
 
Posts: 1905
Western Australia

Re: 308W AR2208 BM8208

Post by BRNO_Bigot » 30 Oct 2018, 2:43 pm

duncan61 wrote:I purchased 4kg of 2208 a while back and load.222 .243 and the 100gn pills in my 7mm.none are compressed and they all burn clean some loads are compressed in the loading data so I am sure it is fine.an experienced shooter at the range when I was new said I could fill my .222 to the top and compress the load and I thought he was mad however even a compressed .222 is not as much powder as a .223



If I was stuck with just one powder it'd probably be 2208 - acceptably good in everything I have from .223 to .458 Win.

Not perfect in all of them, but better than any other over that spread.
--
It's only when you look at an ant through a magnifying glass on a sunny
day that you realise how often they burst into flames.
User avatar
BRNO_Bigot
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 224
Australian Capital Territory

Re: 308W AR2208 BM8208

Post by Stoney » 30 Oct 2018, 4:12 pm

Try AR2206H, it is very consistent and can be safely used for reduced loads. From what I have read it's the bee's knee's for 308,303 etc. I put a mate onto it and he shot great groups.
User avatar
Stoney
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 395
Queensland


Back to top
 
Return to Reloading ammunition