favorite 243 loads

Reloading equipment, methods, load data, powder and projectile information.

Re: favorite 243 loads

Post by Bugman » 26 Oct 2019, 4:08 pm

Confirming 41grns of AR2209 with a Hornady 87grn V-max................my choice in a Weatherby Vanguard.
User avatar
Bugman
Warrant Officer C2
Warrant Officer C2
 
Posts: 1087
New South Wales

Re: favorite 243 loads

Post by bigpete » 26 Oct 2019, 4:43 pm

What recoil with the whelen ?
bigpete
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3629
South Australia

Re: favorite 243 loads

Post by GQshayne » 26 Oct 2019, 7:19 pm

Bugman wrote:Confirming 41grns of AR2209 with a Hornady 87grn V-max................my choice in a Weatherby Vanguard.


That is a very light load you have there, so I expect will be well below max in your rifle. Is it particularly accurate???
GQshayne
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
 
Posts: 844
Queensland

Re: favorite 243 loads

Post by bigrich » 26 Oct 2019, 7:29 pm

GQshayne wrote:
Bugman wrote:Confirming 41grns of AR2209 with a Hornady 87grn V-max................my choice in a Weatherby Vanguard.


That is a very light load you have there, so I expect will be well below max in your rifle. Is it particularly accurate???


that is a light load
User avatar
bigrich
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 4505
Queensland

Re: favorite 243 loads

Post by Daz243 » 27 Oct 2019, 8:27 pm

I use 43.5gr of ar2209 for the 87 v-max and 42gr of ar2209 for the 85 Sierra hpbt.
Daz243
Recruit
Recruit
 
Posts: 14
New South Wales

Re: favorite 243 loads

Post by bigrich » 27 Oct 2019, 9:26 pm

Daz243 wrote:I use 43.5gr of ar2209 for the 87 v-max and 42gr of ar2209 for the 85 Sierra hpbt.


thanks for the info daz, and the rest of youse ;) i went through some handloads on the weekend. it was a bit windy , not great conditions for load comparisons. ar2208 had okay results, suprisingly RE22 turned out some great groups . i'll post the details and pics in a day or two. hopefully i'll lay my hands on some ar2209 to try soon to

:drinks: :drinks: :thumbsup:
User avatar
bigrich
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 4505
Queensland

Re: favorite 243 loads

Post by Bugman » 28 Oct 2019, 2:32 pm

GQshayne wrote:
Bugman wrote:Confirming 41grns of AR2209 with a Hornady 87grn V-max................my choice in a Weatherby Vanguard.


That is a very light load you have there, so I expect will be well below max in your rifle. Is it particularly accurate???

Yes it is a light load however I found that it maintains excellent accuracy. Have a look at "me three...goats nil" post.
I found that this load is perfect for my rifle. I have tried a number of combinations at my local range up to 200m and this one proved to be the better.
Me thinks I will stick to it.
User avatar
Bugman
Warrant Officer C2
Warrant Officer C2
 
Posts: 1087
New South Wales

Re: favorite 243 loads

Post by GQshayne » 28 Oct 2019, 8:59 pm

I have never gone that low, only 42gn. But if it works then that is what counts.

My rifles did not show much variation in accuracy when load testing, so I try to stay at a point where velocity does not go too low.
GQshayne
Staff Sergeant
Staff Sergeant
 
Posts: 844
Queensland

Re: favorite 243 loads

Post by bigrich » 30 Oct 2019, 4:36 pm

Well fellas, here’s some results from some 243 load testing I did last Saturday. It was a bit windy, not optimum conditions. The 2208 was so-so, I was surprised at the RE22 results. 87 gn vmax was used in all loads, COL was 2.650”
Attachments
image.jpg
Not a bad result. 100 yards. Could improve after a few more rounds down the barrel as it’s only had about 40 rounds down it so far
image.jpg (1.41 MiB) Viewed 3053 times
User avatar
bigrich
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 4505
Queensland

Re: favorite 243 loads

Post by Stix » 30 Oct 2019, 5:25 pm

Bugman wrote:
GQshayne wrote:
Bugman wrote:Confirming 41grns of AR2209 with a Hornady 87grn V-max................my choice in a Weatherby Vanguard.


That is a very light load you have there, so I expect will be well below max in your rifle. Is it particularly accurate???

Yes it is a light load however I found that it maintains excellent accuracy. Have a look at "me three...goats nil" post.
I found that this load is perfect for my rifle. I have tried a number of combinations at my local range up to 200m and this one proved to be the better.
Me thinks I will stick to it.

Id once heard a bloke claim his load is 36 of 08 shoot'n cheap 70's...

It does ground creatures that once walked...cant say ther is anything emphatic about the results, but then some people are in it for the notoriety of 'tale telling within the click' rather than animal welfare & marksmanship...

:|
The man who knows everything, doesnt really know everything...he's just stopped learning...
Stix
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3675
South Australia

Re: favorite 243 loads

Post by Stix » 30 Oct 2019, 5:31 pm

bigrich wrote:Well fellas, here’s some results from some 243 load testing I did last Saturday. It was a bit windy, not optimum conditions. The 2208 was so-so, I was surprised at the RE22 results. 87 gn vmax was used in all loads, COL was 2.650”


BR..."some results"...
Mate thats one target...(a good target mind you... :thumbsup: )

Im really keen to see what you produced in the order it was produced--not just the best--there is nothing wrong with real life results if they're not great...

Ill be loading & shooting for a 243 one day & keen to see how you progress from a brand new barrel mate... :thumbsup:

And im sure there are a lot of guys looking that would get value out of a write up for the entire saga of finding the sweet spot... :thumbsup:

:drinks:
The man who knows everything, doesnt really know everything...he's just stopped learning...
Stix
Colonel
Colonel
 
Posts: 3675
South Australia

Re: favorite 243 loads

Post by bigrich » 30 Oct 2019, 9:10 pm

Stix wrote:
bigrich wrote:Well fellas, here’s some results from some 243 load testing I did last Saturday. It was a bit windy, not optimum conditions. The 2208 was so-so, I was surprised at the RE22 results. 87 gn vmax was used in all loads, COL was 2.650”


BR..."some results"...
Mate thats one target...(a good target mind you... :thumbsup: )

Im really keen to see what you produced in the order it was produced--not just the best--there is nothing wrong with real life results if they're not great...

Ill be loading & shooting for a 243 one day & keen to see how you progress from a brand new barrel mate... :thumbsup:

And im sure there are a lot of guys looking that would get value out of a write up for the entire saga of finding the sweet spot... :thumbsup:

:drinks:


that was the best load so far stix, i didn't want to bore anyone with a blow by blow account. just the highlights ...... :lol:
i don't seem to be having much luck with the sierra hpbt 85 gn projectiles yet the COL measures 2.625 in my barrel . i've tried 2.602 loads and they sprayed a bit . on the old barrel with the same measured COL these were more accurate than the hornady . i'm not expecting target rifle results, but i want to set this up as a portable rifle that can shoot out to 300 with a degree of accuracy . i'm not intending to use this rifle for deer or pigs ,more roos, goats on down in terms of game weight . bit more reach than my 222 :D . the 87 vmax will do the job,( i know someone who's taken deer with them ) but the sierra is a more flexable projectile reportedly. i'll try 10 thou off the lands and 30 thou as well and see how i go . i've a sneaking suspicion the accuracy may improve with another hundred or so rounds on the barrel as well. :thumbsup:
User avatar
bigrich
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 4505
Queensland

Re: favorite 243 loads

Post by bigrich » 02 Nov 2019, 6:55 pm

Well, I tested another batch of loads, using ar2209 and RE22 . The RE22 put the second bullet just about through the first hole, the third going slightly out to the right. Those first two shots are the most important in a hunting rifle for me . The 2209 group is using 43.5 gn, I’m going to creep up to 44gn and see if there’s more in it. Aside from playing with COL , I’ve just about got my 87vmax load sorted. Sierra 85 HPBT would be my preferred all round projectile, but they seem fussy to get to shoot well. Has anyone tried 90gb Nosler BT’s in 243 at all ? Thanks to all who offered advice, that’s why I like being a part of this forum :thumbsup:
Attachments
image.jpg
43.5 gn of ar2209 I’ll creep up a little more on this
image.jpg (1.56 MiB) Viewed 3012 times
image.jpg
RE22, 47 gn .reckon I might have pulled the third shot. I’m going to try this load again
image.jpg (1.33 MiB) Viewed 3012 times
User avatar
bigrich
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 4505
Queensland

Re: favorite 243 loads

Post by bigrich » 02 Nov 2019, 6:58 pm

bloody phones :x ! no i wasn't standing on my head when i shot them :lol: you guys get the general idea ;)

:drinks: :drinks: :thumbsup:
User avatar
bigrich
Major General
Major General
 
Posts: 4505
Queensland

Re: favorite 243 loads

Post by Flyer » 09 Dec 2019, 2:52 am

44.5gr of 2209 with the 87gr V-max. Here are two 4-shot groups. Chronoed at 3277fps (average) out of a 22.5" barrel. This was my favourite load for the Sako.

Vmax.jpg
Vmax.jpg (785.42 KiB) Viewed 2953 times


Vmax2.jpg
Vmax2.jpg (793.18 KiB) Viewed 2953 times
The laws of physics do not apply to politics.
Flyer
Corporal
Corporal
 
Posts: 392
-

Re: favorite 243 loads

Post by GojiraSteve » 09 Dec 2019, 4:02 pm

bigrich wrote: thanks for the reply daz , i thought the sierra COL issue might be a isolated case related to my rifle , obviously not . great projectile though :thumbsup:


Got the same issue with a brand new Franchi Horizon. Never seen it before. Maybe its a .243 thing? Maybe manufacturers leaving some meat in the throat to extend barrel life?
GojiraSteve
Lance Corporal
Lance Corporal
 
Posts: 110
New South Wales

Previous

Back to top
 
Return to Reloading ammunition