kransky93 wrote:The loads is
Ar2206h 25.2gr
55gr vmax
C.O.L 2.250
deye243 wrote:Hornady and imr4895 is not the same as 06H ...... H4895 is
deanp100 wrote:I’ve just loaded 25.1 and 25.3 gr of 2206h. 3030 and 3060 FPS respectively. Heaps of room to go.
kransky93 wrote:deanp100 wrote:I’ve just loaded 25.1 and 25.3 gr of 2206h. 3030 and 3060 FPS respectively. Heaps of room to go.
Stupid question but how far up the brass does that come up to?
deye243 wrote:Hornady and imr4895 is not the same as 06H ...... H4895 is
stihl88 wrote:deye243 wrote:Hornady and imr4895 is not the same as 06H ...... H4895 is
Correct but it is interchangeable and I only have Hornady load data on hand, refer to ADI chart > http://www.adiworldclass.com.au/powder-equivalents/
deye243 wrote:Not my experience in 40 years of using this powder and it's predecessor 2206 gets down to to -3 at times and the hottest I have used this powder is 37 nowhere near how hot it gets in summer but no problems.
Now I understand the caution thing but stop telling this bloke to load his 223 to less than 222r velocity.
This is the reason I like US forums they know how to hand load not reload .
Every rifle is different .
in2anity wrote:Can confirm, it's not. I bet it's just a howa.
kransky93 wrote:Lithgow la102
bladeracer wrote:stihl88 wrote:deye243 wrote:Hornady and imr4895 is not the same as 06H ...... H4895 is
Correct but it is interchangeable and I only have Hornady load data on hand, refer to ADI chart > http://www.adiworldclass.com.au/powder-equivalents/
Equivalent does _not_ mean the load data is interchangeable, it means the powders are designed to operate within similar parameters.
But, for all practical purposes I don't think there is much if any difference between H4895 and IMR4895 load data.